Ekeke
Full Member
Then fire Jose and get a manager in who you do trust. Doing nothing was just ridiculous and is a huge mistake that Woodward must accept the blame for.
He trusted him to do better with what he has.
Then fire Jose and get a manager in who you do trust. Doing nothing was just ridiculous and is a huge mistake that Woodward must accept the blame for.
Before or after he resigns?Sacking Mourinho should be on his to-do list for tomorrow.
No. A manager obviously needs funds to buy his own players and build his own team. Mourinho got over £350m to do that and signed almost a full XI of players and has completely failed with them.So if it’s all Mourinho’s fault and no new players were needed, if Mourinho is sacked the new manager won’t need any new players, right?
Since we appointed Woodward he hasn't had a plan for us other than to make money, that's why were in this mess.
Well, extending Mourinho's contract was a sackable offense in itself.Before or after he resigns?
Watching people blame Ed Woodward for Jose Mourinho's inability to get a team with players like Lukaku, Martial, Pogba and Mata get more than two shots on target is hilarious.
I don’t think that is true at all. Looked like there was a plan with LVG to build a team then pass it over to Giggs. However fan and media hysteria and Jose being available they threw out the plan, bottled it and appointed Jose. We also seem to be making mass changes with the structuring of the club, so there must be a plan for the future.Since we appointed Woodward he hasn't had a plan for us other than to make money, that's why were in this mess.
Regardless of who you are up against when you have 2 CB's that don't have the experience or the level needed at the moment to be starters for a top club and you end up 2 down due to CB errors, not to mention another 4-5 chances created because of our inability to get the ball out of our half you are bound to be in trouble.I’m not a UTD fan, but losing to Brighton having spent half a billion since Fergie left has nothing to do with Woodward.
If we’re talking about overtaking City, then fair enough, but Brighton are Brighton, and Mourinho is Mourinho.
Money, or lack of money should not come in to today’s result in any shape or form, it’s Brghton.
Good point well made.Since we appointed Woodward he hasn't had a plan for us other than to make money, that's why were in this mess.
Regardless of who you are up against when you have 2 CB's that don't have the experience or the level needed at the moment to be starters for a top club and you end up 2 down due to CB errors, not to mention another 4-5 chances created because of our inability to get the ball out of our half you are bound to be in trouble.
Brighton are not a pub team.
It's crystal clear for everyone that our full backs can't create enough in the attacking third, or CB's can't participate well enough in the build up and neither can even do the defensive job at hand tracking his marker.
Jose begins building his teams from the back. When you don't address all those issues it's obvious you'll struggle yet again.
If the board doesn't back Jose, then he needs to resign as soon as tomorrow, no point writing off yet another season.
On what planet does it have to be one or the other? For example, you can make independtly shit posts in many threads. Bury your head in the sand all you want and keep it nice and simple so you can understand it. Meanwhile the club is being ruined off pitch. They’re separate things and both Woodward and mourinho can be to blame.
How about blaming the players?
I get what you’re saying, but a couple of weeks ago, people were saying the 30 million pounds Bailley was one of the best in the league, and along with Lindleoff (I may have spelt that wrong), who cost 31 million, should you or the neutral public expect more from them?
Jose has been backed since he has been at UTD, who spent 70 million in the window, to go on top of the 150 million last season. I do get the concerns, especially with City strengthening and Liverpool, but my point remains that people on here are getting annoyed at losing to Brighton, but that shouldn’t be about money, based on the team you had on the pitch.
I am not sure the Board trust Jose. If he wants a long term project, and be there for years on end, then he can’t spend 150 million every season.
Completely agreed. Great call, saved us from wasting more money.He was spot on not giving Jose money if this is the kind of shite he serves up. It was fecking Brighton for gods sake, you hardly need to be world class to see them off.
I’m not a UTD fan, but losing to Brighton having spent half a billion since Fergie left has nothing to do with Woodward.
If we’re talking about overtaking City, then fair enough, but Brighton are Brighton, and Mourinho is Mourinho.
Money, or lack of money should not come in to today’s result in any shape or form, it’s Brghton.
Completely agreed. Great call, saved us from wasting more money.
He was spot on not giving Jose money if this is the kind of shite he serves up. It was fecking Brighton for gods sake, you hardly need to be world class to see them off.
Also needs his arse kicked for extending the clown's contract.His only mistake now would be letting Jose stay much longer. Same old performances.
Also needs his arse kicked for extending the clown's contract.
Yup, the clown played the situation beautifully to his advantage. Should have called his bluff though.He didnt have a choice, because JM`s sperm product enjoyed watching PSG, probably not so much after he extended contract tho.