- Joined
- Feb 12, 2018
- Messages
- 20,382
Beckham will have his own club to be dealing with - we won't be hiring him.
At the contrary, hard to find someone worse than him for this position.Seems like a job made for Sir Alex.
There is so much misunderstanding for the figure of a DoF/GM in this thread going on, and it seems that a lot of people live in a bubble when the GM-coach structure is the bizarre one with the God-Emperor manager being the common one, when in truth is the exact opposite. GM-coach structure is by far the most common structure in both football and American sports and has been so for decades, while the all powerful manager has been the dominant structure in English football until recently. And despite the money on English football (as a result of wise financial/advertisement decisions, going global in TV before the others and English language), English clubs historically have lacked behind European counterparts. I guess that European clubs have been doing something right.
God-Emperor manager model works only if you have a long term manager. You cannot plan for a long-term manager, it happens organically when it happens. You can plan long term with a DoF though and short-term managers. Some long term planning (even if not perfect) is much better than give you half a billion, build your own team, get sacked, rinse and repeat which is what we have been doing.
I don't see how a DOF would improve much when the chief executive is under orders from the owners to cut the spending. End of the day it'll be Woodward telling a DOF that Alderwereld/Boateng aren't value for money and not sanction it, so unless the plan is to hand a DOF £150m every summer and say do what you want then no. Mourinho is very good in the transfer market for the most part. Some fans here have gotten it into their heads that a DOF would somehow solve all the problems without actually recognising what the main source of problems is.
1) GM stay long, coaches don't. Proven fact. There is SAF in football, Wenger too (but then he failed for the last decade), Popp in NBA and that's it when it comes to long term managers who also serve as GM. On the other side, there are countless examples of long term GMs.Why is it easier to have a long term DoF as opposed to a manager? Sounds like the manager just becomes the fall guy for when the DoF fails to get the right players.
Can we bring back David Gill? I liked him
Re #2-who wins is related directly to who spends the most on their team. How can the transfer window not be important?1) GM stay long, coaches don't. Proven fact. There is SAF in football, Wenger too (but then he failed for the last decade), Popp in NBA and that's it when it comes to long term managers who also serve as GM. On the other side, there are countless examples of long term GMs.
2) Contrary to the beliefs of modern football fans, transfer windows are not the most important part of football. Titles - for most part - are won based on how the coach manages to get the best of the team, not based on transfer windows.
3) GM-coach is the structure which works in practice and has been so for decades. All powerful coach works when you have an anomaly like SAF or Poppovich, and you just can't neither plan for it, not expect it to happen.
4) GM doesn't do training, doesn't have to work and fall out with players, doesn't have to fight with media and so on, so it makes the job far less stressful and so doesn't get spent after 3 years like coaches do.
Good postThere is so much misunderstanding for the figure of a DoF/GM in this thread going on, and it seems that a lot of people live in a bubble when the GM-coach structure is the bizarre one with the God-Emperor manager being the common one, when in truth is the exact opposite. GM-coach structure is by far the most common structure in both football and American sports and has been so for decades, while the all powerful manager has been the dominant structure in English football until recently. And despite the money on English football (as a result of wise financial/advertisement decisions, going global in TV before the others and English language), English clubs historically have lacked behind European counterparts. I guess that European clubs have been doing something right.
God-Emperor manager model works only if you have a long term manager. You cannot plan for a long-term manager, it happens organically when it happens. You can plan long term with a DoF though and short-term managers. Some long term planning (even if not perfect) is much better than give you half a billion, build your own team, get sacked, rinse and repeat which is what we have been doing.
Honestly i don't the names of the DOF at other teams, except for Monchi. I would like whoever Atletico Madrid is having though
They are important, but nowhere as important as the other part of football, getting the best of players you have. For most part in the last 15 years, there have been 3-4 teams in England with comparable quality (not necessarily equal). In Spain, Real and Barca have had comparable quality as long as I remember. Maybe one slightly better than the other in terms of players, but comparable. Who won the titles for most part is the team who got the best out of its players. Be that cause of manager, a sense of togetherness and harmony, some player having an once in lifetime season, a bit of luck, and quite often most if not all these things coming together at the same time.Re #2-who wins is related directly to who spends the most on their team. How can the transfer window not be important?
A DOF won't keep the entire business on his shoulders and won't take decisions on its own, he still needs to present stuff to the board and the board to accept it.DoF stuff in the British media is always funny, as a lot of them seem unable to fathom not resting the entire business on the shoulders and judgement of one person, as if wanting others to have a say in the decision making process is the gravest insult imaginable for a Proper Football Man. Personally, if I was an owner, I'd have grave misgivings about entrusting hundreds of millions of quid to one guy, who is probably lining the pockets of his own agent or people known to him and who has little to no regard to the business' financial security.
Also, as an example, for the people who get very riled up about the style of football and want us to play The United Way, hiring someone to ensure a long term, overarching philosophy which fosters a sustainable structure that managers/coaches have to fit into. People keep mentioning SAF and his 'most important thing in football is control' quote but it ignores a couple of things: he was, in almost every sense, the exception to the rule and even he, for a great many reasons done to death on here, had his issues with recruitment near the end.
I was referring to the fact that some of the British media believe that the sensible approach is to put everything on the manager's shoulders.A DOF won't keep the entire business on his shoulders and won't take decisions on its own, he still needs to present stuff to the board and the board to accept it.
He's more of a middle man between the manager and the board on the sporting front, planning for the future, making sure the club has a good sporting ideea etc. But he still needs to go through the board.
Andrea Berta he has been linked to United before
Good post
Took me a while to realise it but this is how we need to instill continuity. It just can't be done via manager as they get sacked too much. I always thought it would be easy to just not sack a manager and give him time but it seems to be impossible.
his transfers have hardly been brilliant here. not sure I have seen anything really about the owners wanting to cut spending. moneys there if the targets are right. if get the right DOF and we as a club decide the direction we all want to go in then it could work. but cant see a DOF working well with Jose to be fair.
https://www.independent.co.uk/sport...atici-domenico-teti-ed-woodward-a8489861.html
Well this is promising if true. Hopefully it's not like our transfer strategy where we just aim for the biggest name and settle for the lowest price.
What did the article say? Seems to have been taken down.https://www.independent.co.uk/sport...atici-domenico-teti-ed-woodward-a8489861.html
Well this is promising if true. Hopefully it's not like our transfer strategy where we just aim for the biggest name and settle for the lowest price.
What did the article say? Seems to have been taken down.
What did the article say? Seems to have been taken down.
Weird. I checked the link Delaney posted in his tweet and it was really deleted.
Okay thanks, both interesting choices, Monchi only recently moved didn't he?Mentioned Paratici at Juve and Monchi at Roma. Both would be difficult. Said that we have also contacted Teti at Novara.
Weird. I checked the link Delaney posted in his tweet and it was really deleted.