noodlehair
"It's like..."
Fair enough Noodle i just don’t share the same opinion on this one...im of the opinion hed be just what we need when we lose the great man...one of the main reasons being i think were going to need more than just a quality manager when Fergie does retire were also going to need a huge character….a man who can handle the pressure of filling the great mans shoes...an entirely different aspect than just being a good manager of a team...
Out of interest who would you like to see given the job?
I agree about the character bit. I pity whoever does step in after Fergie, to be honest. The problem is as always happens in these sitautions...we'll be looking for a replacement to Fergie, and such a thing doesn't exist. I think a lot of people back Mourinho just because of the character aspect. He'll make the job his own, but for me that's exactly the problem, that he'll make the job his own.
and I'm not sure who I'd want at the moment. There's some good managers out there who I know little about. Maybe O'Neill? He's no Fergie, but he knows what he's doing, has handled being in charge of a big club before, and seems to do well wherever he ends up. He nearly won Celtic a European trophy aswell. You only have to look at what's happened to them since to see how hard that must have been.
Not if you still allow for Porto's late goal, then it would have been 2-2 on aggregate and headed to extra time.
Yes, well now you're just arguing for the sake of it. They might never have got the goal back, or it might have ended 2-2. Who knows?
The phantom goal was tough shit, and Chelsea never did enough to deserve to win the tie.
Grant wasn't shit. He took Chelsea to the to within a couple of points of the title, and would have won the CL were it not for a Terry slip. Scolari was not shit either, his team had run into a bit of a bad patch and so he was dimissed. Abramovich is just trigger happy, face it. Hiddink would have also taken the job had he not been managing Russia aswell.
Ask Chelsea fans what they thought of Grant and Scolari. They made silly team selections, didn't get the best out of key players and in fact couldn't even keep the dressing room together. Grant's dismissal was a bit unfair on the face of it, but he was only brought in to hold things in place after Jose stormed off, and ultimately he didn't quite do the business. Scolari turned Chelsea into a side that couldn't even compete on the same pitch as United or Liverpool, and he'd lost the dressing room. He had to go.
Supposing Abramovic did make a couple of signings. So what? It's hardly ideal, but I bet someone like David Moyes wouldn't mind being "forced" to sign Michael Ballack, if he were given unlimited funds to build the rest of his team with first. It's hardly managing with no arms.