Maguire | he stays!

Just get Pavard and play Maguire in the reserves

All seems to point that United has no money left to put upfront. Maybe that's just them being conservative or not flaunting... Maybe we'll see some usual panic signings on August 31. But the line has been that additional recruits will only come in to replace outgoings 1:1.
 
Yeah, EtH fecked up big time with that one. The man needs no encouragement whatsoever. He's like the dude who misconstrues momentary momentary eye contact from a girl as genuine interest. EtH could beat him like a red-headed stepchild and Maguire would find tough love in it.

feck sake.

:lol:
 
We should not be booing ANY of our players. The best thing to do is accept that he'll be here for this season at least and use him in the odd cup game when we need to rotate.

Hopefully Southgate grows a pair and picks players that actually play every week: Colwill, Guehi and Tomori are all good options, even Shaw as CB with Chilwell lb will do.

Maguire is within his rights to dig his heels in about his contract. We're the fools who dished it out. Next season his amortization will be about 13/14m; hopefully we can sell around that figure and lower clubs may give him a bit more wages. Doubt it though.
 
Who said 80k? Even if he only gets 20k/week he will likely come out ahead vs. forgoing 50% of his salary for 2 years. He is making the smart and right decision.

Anyway looks like ETH wants him so the vitriol he is receiving for his "decision" is misplaced. The club created this scenario and need to love with the consequences of their own decisions.
Nah with 20k after 2 years the math doesn’t add up.

WHU most likely will have offered him 4 years contract. If he played well and got a one year extension then he’s ahead. 4 years contract equals his United pay. He will be 34 at the time and considering nutrition and fitness levels, preserving his value he could get 1-2 years at least at lower level probably at around 50-60k.

if he’s marginalised at United, he’d be 32, zero form, zero credentials anymore, most likely forgotten and getting pay as you play, don’t see any PL team touching him apart from recently promoted and Luton for example are paying their star players 10k per week?

if he was banking on him and keeping shape and prolonging his career then getting playing time should be his goal. If he’s unsure of his qualities but still want to get the bag - then yeah getting the promised bag sitting in a corner seems the safe option.
 
He isn’t being (and shouldn't be) forced to take a pay cut under any circumstances. That is a decision he has the right to make. If I were in his shoes, I would probably do the same thing if I’m thinking of securing the most amount of money for my and my family’s future. Assuming I’m not playing for my beloved team, of course. Of course. Sure, my wife and kids won’t starve without the 7 millions, but if I want only the best things money can buy for them and for myself, then it makes sense to not give up on that.

So what if Slabhead doesn’t mind soaking up all the vitriol from the fans and the press while his hands are superglued cupping his ears the whole time? What if he’s ready to warm the bench and miss out on not winning anything with England for at least the next two years or so? If he wants to handle it then there’s not much I could blame him for. Speaking of blame, I think the club should shoulder the burden of it on this one due to the ridiculous wages we’ve offered him.

I do feel for us fans though, because we (alright, mostly, you) are paying for this this man’s lavish lifestyle. It’s like getting a tv subscription because you want to watch the crême de la crême football has to offer, but also having to pay for channels you’ll watch only when high or drunk, or if reincarnated as house cat, or something. He’s basically the shopping channel among footballers. It’s unfair, but we can’t do much about it. Them Glazers are rich enough to inject those 7 millions into the club, but we know they don’t do that. Maybe we could have gotten West Ham to pay for the wall of a defender he is?

Anyway, I wonder if this will set the precedent of players who are reluctant to move asking to be paid a fee by the selling club. Slippery slope fallacy?
This lad was done for me when he said "I have nothing to prove at United." All footballers have something to prove, it's professional sport, proving yourself is the name of the game, competing to win and to earn respect from your team mates. He should've been stripped of the captaincy after that statement and now this over money just proves he's already retired mentally. He's a waster with a weak mentality. He's been a failure at United and England will do nothing with him too. West ham better off without players like him.
 
We should not be booing ANY of our players. The best thing to do is accept that he'll be here for this season at least and use him in the odd cup game when we need to rotate.

Hopefully Southgate grows a pair and picks players that actually play every week: Colwill, Guehi and Tomori are all good options, even Shaw as CB with Chilwell lb will do.

Maguire is within his rights to dig his heels in about his contract. We're the fools who dished it out. Next season his amortization will be about 13/14m; hopefully we can sell around that figure and lower clubs may give him a bit more wages. Doubt it though.
He's going to do the same as Hazard and say he wants to fight for his place. Knows well that no other club will pay him what United do. Hope they leave him to rot in the reserves for the remainder of his contract.
 
Nice knowing we will be stuck with Maguire and Scott until 2026. For the fans mental health, exclude them from any social media and give them no minutes to play. Least they can do is let us forget about them, Maguire in particular.
 
I really don't understand what the fuss is about for the payout. Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang, Mesut Ozil, Shkodran Mustafi and Sead Kolasinac have all been paid to leave the Emirates in the past three years. Pepe will be next.
Well, probably the financial element of the payout is the fuss.

The club has been very clear that all incomings are facilitated by outgoings at this point. Either due to FFP or the owners or both, which makes your Arsenal comparison largely irrelevant. So at some point during this Magure deal it has broken down on account of that equation. That being the modest fee we're receiving from West Ham against his book value versus having to pay Maguire off a huge chunk and then having to get someone else in. All of that was being explored concurrently, considering Pavard and Tobido were looked at.

I don't think it was a matter of moral principle or whether Harry is being a cheeky boy.
 
Amrabat has been quoted at various prices but the brief all along has been that he is the replacement for Fred and Donny once those deals are done, we will see if that is what happens. Bayern slapped a 50M tag on Pavard over the weekend and at that price we would not have had anywhere near enough money from the Maguire sale to bring him in.
I think the brief for Amrabat is 2 out of three (Donny, Fred, McT) as we might not be able to shift Donny.

still he’s cheaper than both Maguire/ McT at the quoted figures.

The Pavard quote is probably negotiation stand point. Mount was quoted at 70-80m at the beginning of the window…
 
He's not as his lowest ebb yet. If he stays and is kept on the bench he'll fall further out of favour and jeopardise his England career. He has every right to negotiate and in most cases there will be a compromise between all 3 parties (United, West Ham and Maguire) with each taking a hit. But its not like Maguire has nothing to lose by holding out, he has limited time left in the game.
Maybe the England career no longer excites him. He will be 31 by then and probably not be a starter for England whether or not he plays regular football henceforth.
People are making too much of the England role to convince themselves that Maguire should leave for West Ham.
 
Well, probably the financial element of the payout is the fuss.

The club has been very clear that all incomings are facilitated by outgoings at this point. Either due to FFP or the owners or both, which makes your Arsenal comparison largely irrelevant. So at some point during this Magure deal it has broken down on account of that equation. That being the modest fee we're receiving from West Ham against his book value versus having to pay Maguire off a huge chunk and then having to get someone else in. All of that was being explored concurrently, considering Pavard and Tobido were looked at.

I don't think it was a matter of moral principle or whether Harry is being a cheeky boy.
It is not a matter of moral principles or being cheeky. Harry is doing what is best for him.
 
If he is sold, the write off is the book value (£26m) less the sale proceeds (say £23m after his payoff). So the net write off is £3m.

If he is kept there is a £13m amortisation cost.

So the charge to our accounts this year would be £10m more if he is kept than if he is sold (before even taking his wages in to account which would be another £11m+).

Ah, with you.
 
Send him to the reserves and let him rot there. If PSG can do that with Mbappe, Neymar, Verratti etc. we should be able to do that with the feckin fridge too.
 
It is not a matter of moral principles or being cheeky. Harry is doing what is best for him.
No shit. I'm looking at it from the clubs perspective and why the decision was made not to proceed with the pay off.
 
I'm not sure it's very productive to linger too much on it now. Maybe another offer comes this summer (doubt it but heh who knows). He'll be easier to move next year -at a reduced fee-.
I'd rather he was out and replaced this year but what can you do. From the little we really know about all this, I'm not sure I understand the stance of the club.
If the entire idea is to move him on next year, then won't we be better off letting him leave this season with a severance package, thus eliminating his weekly wages from our books, getting an immediate replacement, and grooming the new incoming player? That saves money; that improves our future. Why wait till next year?
 
Send him to the reserves and let him rot there. If PSG can do that with Mbappe, Neymar, Verratti etc. we should be able to do that with the feckin fridge too.

Mbappé is back on the squad, Neymar was transferred within 10 days of being told he was no longer part of the plan, and Verratti was allegedly told the same but that he'll train with the first team and be played as necessary if he can't find a buyer.
The "dropped to reserves" has been done but it's not that common.
 
Last edited:
He doesn't care about playing week in and week out evidently.

Terrible transfer all-around though. I have no idea what we were thinking giving him this much money.
 
I really don't understand what the fuss is about for the payout. Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang, Mesut Ozil, Shkodran Mustafi and Sead Kolasinac have all been paid to leave the Emirates in the past three years. Pepe will be next.
You have better owners than we do. We probably can't afford to pay him off AND get a replacement. Personally, I would just go with Evans as 4th/5th choice and buy a new cb next summer.
 
He's like a turd the club just can't flush.

Got nothing against him as a person. He's probably an alright bloke to hang out with but his footballing abilities are not anywhere up to the standards for any top team and he needs to leave.
 
You have better owners than we do. We probably can't afford to pay him off AND get a replacement. Personally, I would just go with Evans as 4th/5th choice and by a new cb next summer.
I am not familiar with the accounting side of both Arsenal and Man Utd. I only saw 50m or 43m (30m transfer fee + 13m wage saving) vs 7m. I am not familiar with the FFP calculation either. According to Redcafe Maguire will rot to reserve and never play so cost for replacement is irrelevant.
 
He's a liability. Him staying stops us from signing someone who can can actually contribute and add quality to our squad. It'll be almost impossible selling him next summer after another year of not playing, so that's him staying for another two years. We should've made it clear that he isn't gonna play, and if ETH did actually tell him that he's happy for him to stay and fight for his place then it's a massive mistake. He needs to be out of the squad.
 
If the entire idea is to move him on next year, then won't we be better off letting him leave this season with a severance package, thus eliminating his weekly wages from our books, getting an immediate replacement, and grooming the new incoming player? That saves money; that improves our future. Why wait till next year?

I entirely agree but we're not privy to all the financial ins and outs, maybe when all factored it's too much of a bad deal to transfer him for that bid.
Next year his remaining amortization value should be 13m£ at most and only one year of wages to haggle over, even if he doesn't play a lot I could see a couple of teams possibly trying a punt at that price.
 
The thought of him being relied upon in anyway at all just disturbs me, most times you see him play he just seems capable of doing something utterly daft, this club just seems so amateurish at times!
 
Nah with 20k after 2 years the math doesn’t add up.

WHU most likely will have offered him 4 years contract. If he played well and got a one year extension then he’s ahead. 4 years contract equals his United pay. He will be 34 at the time and considering nutrition and fitness levels, preserving his value he could get 1-2 years at least at lower level probably at around 50-60k.

if he’s marginalised at United, he’d be 32, zero form, zero credentials anymore, most likely forgotten and getting pay as you play, don’t see any PL team touching him apart from recently promoted and Luton for example are paying their star players 10k per week?

if he was banking on him and keeping shape and prolonging his career then getting playing time should be his goal. If he’s unsure of his qualities but still want to get the bag - then yeah getting the promised bag sitting in a corner seems the safe option.
Your calculus doesn't make sense. You think he will earn more as a 34 year old than as a 32 year old? That is highly doubtful. Even then, he will have earned as much by 32 if he remains on his current contract as he would do on West Ham's offer by 34 years old, so under no circumstance should he walk away from his contract unless United make up the difference. That is objectively the correct financial decision.
 
I am not familiar with the accounting side of both Arsenal and Man Utd. I only saw 50m or 43m (30m transfer fee + 13m wage saving) vs 7m. I am not familiar with the FFP calculation either. According to Redcafe Maguire will rot to reserve and never play so cost for replacement is irrelevant.
I'm also not sure about the accounting side of things. To me, it seems that Josh Kronke has backed Arteta in getting rid of his unwanted players at all costs. This is not something the Glazers will do.

I don't think Maguire will (nor should) 'rot in the reserves' if he stays. It's a long season, 5th choice will get some minutes here and there.
 
No shit. I'm looking at it from the clubs perspective and why the decision was made not to proceed with the pay off.
He couldn't agree personal terms with West Ham. So the payoff doesn't even come into the picture. Unless we are talking about terminating his contract and paying him salary for next 2 years.
 
Just watched a highlight reel on YouTube of many of Slabhead's greatest blunders in a United shirt. Absolutely shocking this guy has been allowed to stay on as long as he has.

The day he stood and waited on the ball to come to him against Leicester and thus allowed them to pounce on it and score was the day I was done with Maguire.

Failing to unload him this summer will be the greatest failure we could have made in this window.