Maguire | he stays!

It's going to be very solid, set piece based football and probably highly ugly, but probably effective as well.

Our big problem is goals though imo.
He's officially yours. Ajax farewell videos are always Oscar material but with this one I had a hard time not crying together with Edson.
 
Imagine the scenes on here if Maguire decides to ditch that 5 mil pay off and stay put to 'fight for his place'
 
I have never slagged Maguire off, humans make mistakes, its not his fault he's not good enough for United on current form. But just for sake of discussion, Phil Jones > Maguire.

Phil Jones was never a bad player. Injury prone, yes. But during his younger days, his potential was immense, and he was delivering brilliant performances at the highest levels. Forget SAF, even Capello was comparing him to Frank Baresi.

The Italian said: "It is difficult to find a player like him, really difficult. He can play in different positions always at the top level. I found in my career probably two players - Franco Baresi and Fernando Hierro. They played as midfielders and after they played centre-back. I think really good players.

"Jones is a talent. So young but a big talent because when he receives the ball he plays always without fear. Good passes, good solutions. I know something about football and the solution that he chooses every time when he receives the ball always the best.
 
They are not. They're pointing out the inconsistency between what posters say they thought about players at a given time and what they actually posted at that time.

I don't know how you don't get the difference.
Come on now. The posts are like 2-3 years apart. You post something on a high note when we finished second and the perspective doesn't change over time?
You completely missed the point. Everyone posts things that later turn out to be incorrect, the difference is those who deny making those mistakes vs those who own them.
Again same as above. Maguire wasn't a world beater by any means but was solid for a season, then as soon as we employed a more progressive style than the Oleball and normally a higher line or more dynamic style means he'll bad fit for it straight away. We had a thread on that and his role in higher line and many predicted he would fail. Add to that aging and completely devoid of confidence and the result is a meme player.

And you are right, everyone posts incorrect things, but it was a second poster in a row in this thread that got chased for old posts by Leftback, which irked me a bit.
 
He had a tough time here really. Made the most expensive defender and captain straight away. That’s a lot of pressure.
He had a good first season. Played pretty much every single game. Smashed it with England. It just went down hill with the pressure to win increasing.

West Ham is a good move for him. He will do well there
 
He had a tough time here really. Made the most expensive defender and captain straight away. That’s a lot of pressure.
He had a good first season. Played pretty much every single game. Smashed it with England. It just went down hill with the pressure to win increasing.

West Ham is a good move for him. He will do well there

The standard was so low at that we were satisfied he played every single game even though he had some questionable moments his first few seasons where everyone thought he was good.
 
Just a super slo-mo of him assaulting Shaw to a soundtrack of Cavalleria Rusticana would be a fitting end to his tragic time here.
I vaguely recall a clip of him trying a bicycle kick hitting nothing except Pogba's head?
 
The standard was so low at that we were satisfied he played every single game even though he had some questionable moments his first few seasons where everyone thought he was good.

He was peps original replacement for kompany until we outbid them. he played in every single premier league game, 71 games in a row in total before getting his ankle injury before the europa final. I remember people actually being gutted he missed it and we actually felt his loss with that game. When he got man of the match during his debut, he showed much promise. He had a fairly decent season and it’s unfair to say otherwise. He has always had an error in him.. but his united career has certainly gone downhill. It feels like ever since the Greek incident he just never was the same. The retrial happens next year so even that is still hanging over him. His confidence has looked shot for a long time.

Saying that, it’s time he is sold. That’s certain. He isn’t good enough for what we need.. but he is a decent defender and will do well at WH. Much more importance to the team and less pressure will do him wonders imo.

I don’t think he deserves the shite he gets, he is practically a meme at this point. That’s going to affect anyone. He looks shot to pieces. I hope he turns it around and does well for the hammers.
 
Anyone who thinks that it would be weird to pay the difference in Maguire's wages when he takes a step down cannot know anyone who was actually involved in professional football, this is absolutely standard for players who are reducing their wage with a move. There are three potential outcomes in this situation, in the vast majority of cases the player will be fine with leaving but not the money they are leaving behind and so meet in the middle somewhere with the money they are 'giving up', like say 80% of cases. Then you'll have 10% of cases where the player says he's not leaving without being paid the full difference and then 10% where the player just wants out and will forego what they are 'due'. I'd actually say that one is probably less than 10%, probably closer to under 5% and think about it, it's understandable, they signed a contract, clubs expect players to honour contracts, the player therefore expects the clubs to honour contracts.

In Maguire's case we could easy be in the 10% where he's asking for his full contract, it's the biggest one he'll ever have, he doesn't actually want to leave and probably feels a little forced out. He's probably looking at this from the point of view of, if I'm leaving somewhere that I don't want to leave, I'm leaving with all my money.

I wonder if theres ever been a stubborn owner or manager that has been like “ok fine you can stay but you wont play”. Because im sure no player wants to train with kids and not play matches.
 
I have never slagged Maguire off, humans make mistakes, its not his fault he's not good enough for United on current form. But just for sake of discussion, Phil Jones > Maguire.

Phil Jones was never a bad player. Injury prone, yes. But during his younger days, his potential was immense, and he was delivering brilliant performances at the highest levels. Forget SAF, even Capello was comparing him to Frank Baresi.
It's sad how things turned out for Jones. Hugely promising, would have been one of those great United defenders but for his injuries.

Harry is a twat, however not his fault that Woodward and Ole sanctioned 80m on a CB that did not suit modern day football. Crazy how much money we wasted on unsuitable players!
 
His 20/21 performance thread https://www.redcafe.net/threads/harry-maguire-2020-21-performances.457020/
Your last post "he's had an outstanding season"
Clearly getting swept up in his England performances which were pretty immense ;). I did defend Maguire a lot in his first two seasons but looking back I feel Lindelof got a lot more stick than was his due (not that that exonerates him as he was sometimes poor) and I remember the consensus on here that if only Baily would partner Maguire we'd be totally set. It was pretty much acknowledged that we were often poor at the back and we conceded 44 goals that season in a counter attacking team. I still maintain his first season was his best here.
 
I really really really hope we dont feck this and McT transfer up over being greedy. Sounds like typical United though.
Hang on, I thought typical united was the complete opposite where we don't get good fees for our players and sell them for peanuts? So which one is it?
 
Come on now. The posts are like 2-3 years apart. You post something on a high note when we finished second and the perspective doesn't change over time?

Again same as above. Maguire wasn't a world beater by any means but was solid for a season, then as soon as we employed a more progressive style than the Oleball and normally a higher line or more dynamic style means he'll bad fit for it straight away. We had a thread on that and his role in higher line and many predicted he would fail. Add to that aging and completely devoid of confidence and the result is a meme player.

And you are right, everyone posts incorrect things, but it was a second poster in a row in this thread that got chased for old posts by Leftback, which irked me a bit.
You've missed the point again.
 
Clearly getting swept up in his England performances which were pretty immense ;). I did defend Maguire a lot in his first two seasons but looking back I feel Lindelof got a lot more stick than was his due (not that that exonerates him as he was sometimes poor) and I remember the consensus on here that if only Baily would partner Maguire we'd be totally set. It was pretty much acknowledged that we were often poor at the back and we conceded 44 goals that season in a counter attacking team. I still maintain his first season was his best here.
Nah, the common consensus around here was that we had a decent defence because 44 goals in a season was one of the best record in the league. We even had that dumb thread by Sammsky about hipster defenders and how Maguire and Lindelof were actually doing better than supposedly bigger names defenders.

Pointing out that we played so deep with holding midfielders and still conceded more than a goal a game was taboo because Ole was supposed to be the answer to those delusional people :lol:
 
It's more the case that people's opinions back then weren't really objective.

He was Solksjaer's marquee signing for a WR fee. People were lining themselves up to rim him at any given opportunity - and that included his transfers/signings.
:lol:
Thanks for that imagery...
 
I have never slagged Maguire off, humans make mistakes, its not his fault he's not good enough for United on current form. But just for sake of discussion, Phil Jones > Maguire.

Phil Jones was never a bad player. Injury prone, yes. But during his younger days, his potential was immense, and he was delivering brilliant performances at the highest levels. Forget SAF, even Capello was comparing him to Frank Baresi.
I still remember young Phil Jones was being hailed as new Duncan Edwards. He was exiting to watch at times, would throw his body up against any challenge, and his “progressive run” as CB was also breathtaking.
 
For a season when he was doing pretty fine. As soon as he started underperforming, his relationship with player and board were poisonous I too wanted him out and you can check my post history.

It's no surprise you jumped on the topic though considering you were in the same boat as Leftback for 3 years.. :)


So you still think Ole did well or you changed your tune? Cause Maguire was good for a brief while and turned to turd after that initial phase and it's normal that in hindsight some posts might sound stupid now.
The fact that people don't think ole did well at times is exactly the revisionism some posters are talking about.
 
Good grief. The Maguire: West Ham player thread. Will be the same kind of car crash as the Lukaku, Pogba and Ronaldo threads are. At least it will all be self contained then.
 
Good grief. The Maguire: West Ham player thread. Will be the same kind of car crash as the Lukaku, Pogba and Ronaldo threads are. At least it will all be self contained then.

I think most people expect him to do very well at a defensive mid-table club with no expectations for him to do much other than stand in his own box, head crosses away, and maybe knock a long ball for Antonio to scrap for now and then.
 
He was peps original replacement for kompany until we outbid them. he played in every single premier league game, 71 games in a row in total before getting his ankle injury before the europa final. I remember people actually being gutted he missed it and we actually felt his loss with that game. When he got man of the match during his debut, he showed much promise. He had a fairly decent season and it’s unfair to say otherwise. He has always had an error in him.. but his united career has certainly gone downhill. It feels like ever since the Greek incident he just never was the same. The retrial happens next year so even that is still hanging over him. His confidence has looked shot for a long time.

Saying that, it’s time he is sold. That’s certain. He isn’t good enough for what we need.. but he is a decent defender and will do well at WH. Much more importance to the team and less pressure will do him wonders imo.

I don’t think he deserves the shite he gets, he is practically a meme at this point. That’s going to affect anyone. He looks shot to pieces. I hope he turns it around and does well for the hammers.
Nice to read a balanced post.
 
What if West Ham do a Leicester this season and win the PL with Maguire as Captain?

Would be grand for long standing Caf favourite Moyesie (assuming he won't be sacked, that is).

Firmly in the "not bloody likely" category, though.
 
Why? I replied to a post saying he had a great second season by saying i don't think that was the case and i think he was better in his first season. A poster points out that i said he had an outstanding season-which is true, i wrote that- but am i not allowed to think that i went overboard in saying that, especially during a tournament where he was genuinely outstanding? Am I not allowed to consider that we had problems defensively that season and that Maguire might just have been as culpable as the much maligned Lindelof (and as i said he was guilty too).
 
They are not. They're pointing out the inconsistency between what posters say they thought about players at a given time and what they actually posted at that time.

I don't know how you don't get the difference.

There's no inconsistency. As we pointed before, in 2021 the competitors for our best defenders were Bailly, Lindelof, Jones, Rojo and Blackett vs Maguire and Smalling.

Of course Maguire and Smalling are better than these lot.

It doesn't mean they're good by any means. They're just better than these crap players that's all.

There's no contradiction. You and that other poster are just trying to look cool by bringing old posts while giving feck all about the context.
 
Clearly getting swept up in his England performances which were pretty immense ;). I did defend Maguire a lot in his first two seasons but looking back I feel Lindelof got a lot more stick than was his due (not that that exonerates him as he was sometimes poor) and I remember the consensus on here that if only Baily would partner Maguire we'd be totally set. It was pretty much acknowledged that we were often poor at the back and we conceded 44 goals that season in a counter attacking team. I still maintain his first season was his best here.
He was good that season, particularly in the second half of it. It was a widely held opinion. No need to revise it now and say he wasn't.