SqueakyWeasel
Full Member
Well seeing as the target was always 3rd I guess you're rightI think its very possible to finish 4th, but FWIW I argue that even if we do then its still a failed season.
Well seeing as the target was always 3rd I guess you're rightI think its very possible to finish 4th, but FWIW I argue that even if we do then its still a failed season.
My sentiments exactly. I don't mind Utd losing occasionally if they have given the game a good go; but I have to force myself to watch this team under LVG. The players look miserable and the collective performances have been atrocious. This doesn't feel like a Utd team.I honestly cannot take another year of LVG at utd. Something about his tenure here has drained me of almost all my love for the prem league and football in general. When Utd would be out of competitions under Fergie it wasnt sooo bad because somehow I knew there'd be an exciting silver lining (even if it was only the assurance of an assertive bounce back the next season). Now even when we have the chance to win the fa cup after so long, all I can feel is numbness because of our generally shambolic/ clueless football season. his smugness makes things much worse as well
Well seeing as the target was always 3rd I guess you're right
I'll take another Martial or Blind too. Even Fergie took more than his fair share of gambles in the transfer market, Bebe and Zaha come to mind recently while gambles like Hernandez worked out pretty well. Memphis is at least better than either of the former two.
I'll take another Martial or Blind too. Even Fergie took more than his fair share of gambles in the transfer market, Bebe and Zaha come to mind recently while gambles like Hernandez worked out pretty well. Memphis is at least better than either of the former two.
I'm not sure what it would take for people to realize that Leicester City is the outlier, not the rule. If you continue to use the outlier as the standard, you can blast every manager in the league including your butt daddy Mourinho.
There is nothing wrong with buying low key, squad players. As long as we get results, nobody will complain.
The problem with LVG is that even with high profile, Galactico class players, he can't get the best out of them.
Youth players are the only players who will listen to him because he is giving them their "chance", which of course, they will grab with both hands and be grateful for.
But when you have Galactico class players, man management is very important...a skill which LVG lacks.
If you hire Ibrahimovic, Di Maria, Neymar, Ronaldo - these guys will have huge egos to satisfy and you can't treat them like kids or put them on the bench. It won't work out well for LVG or those players.
I'm not sure what it would take for people to realize that Leicester City is the outlier, not the rule. If you continue to use the outlier as the standard, you can blast every manager in the league including your butt daddy Mourinho.
I can see where he's coming from in some instances. There seems to be a "title or sack" mentality among some people.
Why would I think that?Do you think that's the reason we sacked Moyes??
There is nothing wrong with buying low key, squad players. As long as we get results, nobody will complain.
The problem with LVG is that even with high profile, Galactico class players, he can't get the best out of them.
Youth players are the only players who will listen to him because he is giving them their "chance", which of course, they will grab with both hands and be grateful for.
But when you have Galactico class players, man management is very important...a skill which LVG lacks.
If you hire Ibrahimovic, Di Maria, Neymar, Ronaldo - these guys will have huge egos to satisfy and you can't treat them like kids or put them on the bench. It won't work out well for LVG or those players.
No doubt, but to a degree you can blast every manager in the league - at least those in charge of supposed top clubs. Leicester winning the league is an indication said league is highly winnable.
The state of the competition means LVG's "it's not so easy" mantra rings all the more hollow. There's no way in hell that any Fergie vintage would've been sat 17 points behind Leicester City come May - injuries or no bloody injuries.
Martial is probably the only good player LVG had signed AND used correctly. The rest are either crap or philosophy had sucked the life of these players. Some of his own players had left after few months because they couldn't stand him
Why would I think that?
I can see where he's coming from in some instances. There seems to be a "title or sack" mentality among some people.
Blind has done quite well for himself, whether as a midfielder, left back or center back. Shaw was coming along tremendously until he was cut down by injury and Martial has exceeded expectations. I'd think with a year to establish themselves, Schneiderlin and Darmain will both come good.
I'm not justifying it in any way. Understanding something isn't justifying it. You can understand the reason for something without necessarily agreeing with it.cause you seem to be justifying his statement by saying you can understand the sentiments behind his statements.
Not really. Most of the fans would actually be happy to watch United player without ending up falling into sleep. A top 4 place is also a must.
Let me ask one question. Out of our squad which players/manager would play/manage week in week out in a team like Bayern, Real or Barca. Cause that's the standard we should be aiming for.
I would love to know what you class as a successful season. We had a poll earlier in the season on fans expectations, only 35% (me included) expected us to be champions. So most did not think we would be champions. We were certainly not going to win the CL. Therefore, what was success going to look like from your eye's, if winning a trophy is not classed as successful?
I am not defending LVG, I expected the title, so he has not met my expectations, so I am disappointed. I just was surprised to see success defined as a set of attributes that were based more on acceptable performances. I don't find qualifying for CL as success, bit Arsenal'ish. Success to me is winning something.Mate I think that's a little bit unfair. Your argument is with respect a bit of an oversimplification of what is a successful year as far as United is concerned. Yes, not many of us expected to lift the trophy this year, but we (LVG himself also said at the start of the season) a romp for top 3 with a serious challenge for the title was the minimum. Further, being bounced out of a relatively harmless CL group in the horrendous fashion we did killed a lot of people's trust in LVG (remember the Nick Powell sub amongst many tactical gaffs). Then you get totally outplayed by Liverpool in the Europa (after struggling against the likes of Midgetland) when many said (again even LVG did himself) that Europa was the best way into the CL next year. Not to mention the insanely anti-United way we played football over months and months which simply sapped the joy of what used to be a weekly occasion which one looked forward to instead of now gritty your teeth through. Oh how about the December/January implosion in which he clearly was out of ideas and was waiting for the sack (but for insane reasons at least to me) which did not happen. All of these things add up and takes a toll on the collective fanbase. We are not watching United of old which LVG now has the revisionist arrogance to say we should not expect too much because we are now in a period of transition.
So, to be fair, LVG has been far from defensible. He has been consistently arrogant without any empirical arrogance that we have turned the corner. So yes, it would be nice to win the FA cup but we all know winning that does not mean we have made progress at all. Deep down we all know that this has been a vastly disappointing season.
I am not defending LVG, I expected the title, so he has not met my expectations, so I am disappointed. I just was surprised to see success defined as a set of attributes that were based more on acceptable performances. I don't find qualifying for CL as success, bit Arsenal'ish. Success to me is winning something.
I am not defending LVG, I expected the title, so he has not met my expectations, so I am disappointed. I just was surprised to see success defined as a set of attributes that were based more on acceptable performances. I don't find qualifying for CL as success, bit Arsenal'ish. Success to me is winning something.
Yes pretty much this.But here is the dilemma. Winning something is succeeding at something. But is winning the FA the cup the same as having had a successful season? LVG is implying this. Which I find hard to stomach.
Someone should point out to him that Wigan won it and got relegated. Would he count that as a success because they won a cup?But here is the dilemma. Winning something is succeeding at something. But is winning the FA the cup the same as having had a successful season? LVG is implying this. Which I find hard to stomach.
Yep. Wigan won it and got relegated. Winning trophies is always great but they're knockout competitions. Literally anything can happen in a game and you're gone, so no it definitely isn't the same as having a good season. You obviously want to win them but the league is the most important aspect and we've clearly regressed.But here is the dilemma. Winning something is succeeding at something. But is winning the FA the cup the same as having had a successful season? LVG is implying this. Which I find hard to stomach.
Yep. Wigan won it and got relegated. Winning trophies is always great but they're knockout competitions. Literally anything can happen in a game and you're gone, so no it definitely isn't the same as having a good season. You obviously want to win them but the league is the most important aspect and we've clearly regressed.
Mate if he doesn't know that his own captain and vice-captain won the league 5 times (and says his players lack title experience), you expect him to know about Wigan? Whatever facts are put in front of him he "shall" always have a defence. Because he is a world class manager, because of injuries, because the media treated him as a nobody, because we expect too much, because we don't have Neymar or Muller or Bale...
Mate if he doesn't know that his own captain and vice-captain won the league 5 times (and says his players lack title experience), you expect him to know about Wigan? Whatever facts are put in front of him he "shall" always have a defence. Because he is a world class manager, because of injuries, because the media treated him as a nobody, because we expect too much, because we don't have Neymar or Muller or Bale...
I'm not sure what it would take for people to realize that Leicester City is the outlier, not the rule. If you continue to use the outlier as the standard, you can blast every manager in the league including your butt daddy Mourinho.
I think he's right in that it's a general problem that some players will underperform or 'work to rule' in a footballing sense in order to edge under pressure managers out of the club if they don't agree with their methods. One of the things he says occasionally is that some players ignore his tactical instructions, which is serious.Louis van Gaal feels his position as Manchester United manager has been undermined by some underhand tactics employed by the media.
Van Gaal, who was speaking at the club’s end of season awards, suggested reports he could be sacked this season have seriously undermined credibility with his United players.
He said: “I’m a coach, a manager who would rather have some authority but every day the players can read it, what do you think about my authority as well? What do you think about the way they want to follow my advice when the coach is shown like a nobody?
“And I am not what the media is writing because I am very arrogant, because I am one of the best managers in the world.”
Van Gaal, who will lead his side out for this month’s FA Cup final at Wembley, also insisted expectations at the club are too high with the club in a ‘period of transition’.
“I am happy to give the fans a final. The expectations are too high. We are in a period of transition. The players feel that. It’s not so easy.”
I think he's right in that it's a general problem that some players will underperform or 'work to rule' in a footballing sense in order to edge under pressure managers out of the club if they don't agree with their methods. One of the things he says occasionally is that some players ignore his tactical instructions, which is serious.
But I don't see how anyone could've thought these comments were a good idea to make on his part.
Still if Leicester can do it then why not everyone else? are leicester a better squad than everyone else or is everyone else just not managed properly?
Why do English teams blow in europe?
I decided to stay well away from what the press might make of those comments. Instead just sat there smiling all day telling myself he said it all because he knows he's off!Just reading comments on various newspaper sites re LVG saying our expectations are too high etc - and they are absolutely brutal. Far worse than us on the Caf
Seriously, unless our board are living in Disneyland - I cannot see how he'll survive. It will be so so toxic.
They really should have kept him from the booze last night. He's just alienating us more and more, even me! He's a decent man, but honestly, his time is done with us. I'm getting embarrassed the more he opens his mouth nowadays. Our board really need to sort their shit out.