Adebesi
Full Member
"LvG is an idiot, useless, hasn't got a clue, sucks the life out of players, etc. etc." It's all bollocks!!!
The fact is that the players aren't good enough (it's not LvG who, for example, marks a player on the wrong side or fails to complete an easy clearance) and the squad still lacks balance, no matter who the manager is. Should LvG go? It's probably in the best interest of the club. LvG has spent 300M without much progress and the football is too often boring as feck. It's difficult to defend that.
On the other hand, LvG is willing to give youngsters a chance and is putting in foundations for his successors to build on (rather than just providing short term fixes). The positives aspects of LvG's work won't become apparent until several seasons from now. Further to that, none of us can really judge on the work being done behind the scenes.
So if you really do care for the long term success of our football club, Paul Scholes included, then I think it is wise to keep an open mind and consider things from a more broad & long term perspective.
You have to assume if he had any short term fixes he would use them, or he must be the most altruistic manager in the world, happy to fail for the good of his successors.
I agree it is simplistic to lay this all at the manager's door, but most of it has to go there, even if your diagnosis is correct. It is the manager's job to buy the right players, to balance his squad, to motivate his players, to ensure they make the right decisions on the pitch. If they arent doing that, the buck stops with the manager. These players are perfectly capable of marking players on the right side and competing easy clearances, to use your examples: the fact that they arent is what people are referring to when they say Van Gaal has "sucked the life out of the players."