MAME DIOUF 32
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2013
- Messages
- 3,577
I still think we might get a late Christmas present in the morning. I have to believe.
Chelsea were there for the taking, failing to do so is close to unacceptable
Millions of pounds and the blood of our firstborns, the fiendish monster must be stopped.
If this actually happened, I think it would be the dumbest thing I've seen in my years of following sports in general.
We are going to have to pay an absolute fortune to sign anyone in January.
The worst thing is that im sure this idiot will bench Schneirdeline and Herrera soon and we will revert to crap football as soon as Van Gaal feel safe again.
We played well, not Van Gaal's fault that we hit the woodwork twice.
Pretty sure it's the only explanation for now. The board and owners only care about top 4 (Champions League money) to keep sponsors and premium partners happy, the football is secondary. This is the hard truth I'm starting to accept.
I don't even think the players are fighting for him, they didn't against Stoke.
2 shots on target is not playing wellWe played well, not Van Gaal's fault that we hit the woodwork twice.
We are passive, reactive and lack ambition. We also have some leaches running our club, and they'll eventually decide the brand can still be profitable without needing to compete at the top. Think the cowboys in the NFL.
We played well, not Van Gaal's fault that we hit the woodwork twice.
His tactics to keep passing the ball sidewards. It is clearly his tactics that we created 2 shots on target, and keep on creating feck all. He is clueless.We played well, not Van Gaal's fault that we hit the woodwork twice.
It also wasn't Moyes' own squad. And for anyone who says it was a team which won the league by 11 points, LVG took over that same squad with the additions of Mata and Fellaini and spent 250m bringing in who he wanted whilst getting rid of players he deemed not good enough.No I'm not. I'm a United fan. Neither LvG nor Moyes are good enough. Moyes was slightly better. A higher win ratio, more points per game, more goals, more 'success' in cup competitions (including the CL). It's irrefutable.
Tough run of fixtures coming up, Samm.
His tactics to keep passing the ball sidewards. It is clearly his tactics that we created 2 shots on target, and keep on creating feck all. He is clueless.
It makes no sense though. If they care so much for the top 4, then it makes sense to get rid of Van Gaal and so actually have a chance on finishing in top 4. Because with LVG in charge, we surely aren't.Pretty sure it's the only explanation for now. The board and owners only care about top 4 (Champions League money) to keep sponsors and premium partners happy, the football is secondary. This is the hard truth I'm starting to accept.
If your memory isn't too clouded, which I doubt. We got hammered at home by Liverpool,City, lost to Newcastle,Everton(home and away).Lost tamely to swansea. Virtually had no game plan that I saw.
Yup, it was entertaining..... if you're an ABU
I watched the game. The first 20 minutes were very good and a serious improvement. The second half there was 0 penetration, despite possession domination. United had 2 shots on half in the entire game. Let's also remember that we were playing a team who were dross, kept giving the ball away to us and were second to every ball.Did you watch the game? Serious question.
I think that the only way this madness makes sense is if Ed's job is somehow related to LVG's job. Maybe if LVG fails, then it be viewed as Ed's failure too and he will go in the previous position with footballing decisions getting made by someone else. But that is going too far from me.
LVG: "Manchester United has a lot of confidence in its manager and I've not received that in every club. That is my feeling...."
That would explain how far behind we are from Bayern and Barca. They acted swiftly while we are messing around and keeping you.