Grande
Full Member
Well, we really have to agree to disagree on his anticipation as I feel it is just fine.
I see you have replied @Andersons Dietician on the weaknesses you see in his game and overall I feel we are on the same page
Every player has areas of the game that's needs improvement and my saying his defensive game can't be criticized is pointing out that it's very solid and it's more his attacking game that needs tweaking
Honestly, if his defensive game is bad then he's a dud as he doesn't offer much in attack and I just don't see that.
Ok, then we’re not so far of. I think you confuse me and perhaps the poster you earlier answered to with your use of ‘criticizing’ as viewing something as on the whole bad or negative. It’s normally a more neutral word, originally close to ‘analyzing’ - in a neutral way evaluating all the good and the bad on down to the details. It’s normal use I’d say is more about pointing out ‘the bad’ or weaknesses or ‘areas for improvement’ as it’s often referred to today. Shaw, ie, can very well be world class defensively on the whole and still have features or traits worthy of critique.
Likewise, I find some people overlook quite a few strengths he has attacking wise, just because he on the whole isn’t one of the best attacking FBs at the moment.