You're the first person to bring up the word 'English' in this entire thread. Perhaps you're the one with the bias.
Don't really see where you're coming from, it's a pretty widely observable fact that we in this country go way overboard with our youngsters after a couple of games, let alone one season.
I was more making the point that a lot of fans on this forum would readily slate players like Chamberlain, Sterling, Ibe, Wilshere, Stones, Delph, Sinclair, Rodwell, Sturridge, Holding, Chambers.
All who have been or are currently in a similar position to Shaw, regarding football ability and/or time spent on the treatment table.
Come on be realistic, he has been largely underwhelming since his arrival.
I think saying "he's produced nothing" is overly harsh. In the 28 appearances he made during 2014-2016, he got MOTM ratings 5x from the Caf. Obviously it's not the end all measure, but it at least suggests he was capable of making standout contributions up until his leg break. Last season he had 18 appearances at age 21 in his first year after the injury, with no MOTM performances. This is a defining year for his career with us, as it should be, but I think it's silly to say we should have simply moved on already because he didn't light up the stage last season.
Yes it is harsh, but the net sum of his total game time has yielded very little optimism in his ability to become the top LB all (including myself) had predicted.
Starts are all very well and good but I'd be more interested in who they came against, and how well his performance was. That's not to say he has to be MOTM every game, but from what I saw, it wasn't just the poor/average performances but the general lack of improvement which is concerning.