Decotron
Full Member
The respect opposition players are showing him tells its own story. Alot of the improvements im seeing are very much on the bread and butter side of the game but thats been the most frustrating aspect with Nani thus far imo.
I don't know Ekeke, the majority of our good attacking play in the first half came from those two and the inter-play between them, they were running Chelsea ragged. Evra just needs to either cut it back when he gets to the byline or give it to Nani to deliver in.
Their partnership reminded me of how awesome Ronaldo and Evra were. Chelsea were at a complete loss on how to deal with them.
I was kinda disappointed we switched him back to the right in the end. I thought he was doing a number on Ivanovic.
Oh I know, they played well as I said. But could we not have someone else playing one twos and putting Evra through, only to hit the first man or put it nowhere near a player?
Could we perhaps have Nani on the other side, putting in the delivery Evra cant and to some extent, making up for Evra's delivery?
I mean, thats what I like about having Giggs on the left. He can no doubt do any of the passing Nani managed and he can put a good ball into the box.
And we can have Nani on the right where he can play his more direct game thats harder to defend against
However, I do feel that moving him to the left recently is to pave the way for Valencia's return on the right
That's what I was saying, Evra is fantastic at getting behind defences and gets a bit flustered when putting his cross in. He should either cut it back to the edge of the box as we usually have players covering there, or play it back into Nani for the cross, who will have more space after his run.
If we have Nani on the right, the same thing will happen anyway, Evra will still take it down the left, to the byline and put his crosses in. I think you're right though, we will be seeing Valencia back soon in his natural position, so it might be a sense of getting Nani back to how he was on the left.
I see what you mean with Giggs, but even he still plays Evra though, because he always makes the runs in behind. I don't think it matters too much who you put on the left, Evra will still be crossing in as he's often our most advanced player after the one-two's on that side. He just needs to either learn how to cross better, or play it back to someone.
Yeah, he was 'effective' on the left, but why settle for effective on the left when he can be world class on the right? Rooney is effective on the left, but there is always uproar when he is played there. Nani's game just seems blunted on the left, he's still very good but it's not instinctual. His off the ball movement and running wasn't nearly as troublesome for the Chelsea defence as it would have been if he played on the right- I remember a period around the 25th minute when Fletch had made a very good run through the centre of the park and Ivanovic had gone missing. If Nani had burst forward he had the entire left side of the pitch to himself, but he was static. I don't really remember him trying to take on the fullback very often- only when he had been pushed up against the touchline and had to link up with Evra, but taking on a fullback at pace and skinning them is an entirely different thing to jinking past them with a bit of skill from a stand still. Also did he even have a shot all night?
He's good on the left, but I would rather have him be brilliant on the right to be honest.
One blocked shot only, according to the stats. Most unusual for Nani that.Also did he even have a shot all night?
He's good on the left, but I would rather have him be brilliant on the right to be honest.
One blocked shot only, according to the stats. Most unusual for Nani that.
I was kinda disappointed we switched him back to the right in the end. I thought he was doing a number on Ivanovic.
Thats a very clever statement there; the only person that can stop him is himself. He still has a slight tendency to do that extra step over when he could just cross the ball.
He is actually impossible to defend. The only player that can stop him is himself and his selfishness and poor decision making. Luckily his decision making has improved a great deal.
We need a player like this though. Rooney and Berbatov are guilty of not shoooting enough. Carrick doesn't shoot enough too. Anderson can't shoot. Scholes plays too deep.
Imagine having to defend a player who is fast as hell, tricky as feck, and can use both feet to shoot;pass;and dribble with. feck me.
And I'm not concerned about Nani's form on the left when Valencia get's back. If you think Nani can cut in and shoot well from the right side, he is even better at doing it on the left side. See his goals against Spurs and M'boro in his first season.
Really stepped up his game after the Evans red. That's good temperament.
Does he get the assist for the goal today?
I think sometimes him being impossible to defend can explain why, from the perspective of a team mate of his, he is impossible sometimes to play with. Trying to anticipate what he's going to do with the ball or where it's going to come from is sometimes a bit like picking a card out of a well-shuffled deck and hoping it to be the ace of spades every time.
Complete unpredictability isn't always necessarily a positive thing, especially if it's you're primary objective to deliver.
As always with assists, that depends on who you ask. If you ask Premierleague.com then yes. If you ask ESPN then no.
That analogy falls flat on it's arse when you tot up his assists this season
Either that or his team-mates should get down the casinos, pronto.
Premierleague.com seems to be more official than ESPN so ..
So which team mate of his has this perspective then?I think sometimes him being impossible to defend can explain why, from the perspective of a team mate of his, he is impossible sometimes to play with. Trying to anticipate what he's going to do with the ball or where it's going to come from is sometimes a bit like picking a card out of a well-shuffled deck and hoping it to be the ace of spades every time.
Complete unpredictability isn't always necessarily a positive thing, especially if it's you're primary objective to deliver.