My biggest concern is that the players feel stifled by the way he demands they play, it's one thing to have a drilled defensive core but usually the attack has more room for instinct and risk taking, too often our attacking today looked like the players were moving on rails, only allowed to occupy certain areas within their instructions.
His choice today to play two #9's in midfield and Fellaini up top was utterly bizarre though, I can't find any explanation for what he thought that would achieve.
The logic is simple. Fellaini is fairly reliable with winning the ball in the air. If he can win the first ball and lay the ball off to RvP on his left or Rooney on his right, you would hope they could do some damage.
Yep, it is shocking, can't believe we have Di Maria and Falaco at the club, World class attacking players and they are not being utilised properly, they are being told to fit into the "the philosophy" or feck off, why sign them then, if we had those players under SAF we would be destroying teams, tired now of cautious tactics, 3 defeats in a row with no goals scored is alarming.
The manager always takes precedence over the players. Surely you understand that?
All transfers are a gamble and sometimes it doesn't pay off in the first season and sometimes it doesn't pay off at all even. We'll just have to hope for the best that the players we've bought pay off in the long run.
As it is, it is my opinion that ADM hasn't shown himself to be great in tight spaces. From what I've seen of him thus far, he seems more suitable to counter attacking football rather than possession football. Falcao, I have no idea what to make of him.
Either way, I hope at least ADM turns things around (since we already have a sunk cost of 60 million on him). People change and evolve and he may yet have an Indian summer with us. I hope that to be true. And I believe it's achievable as ADM has not been that bad. He actually still has a decent assist and goal rate.
I'd argue that's not true. We were just bad at keeping the ball and passing more especially. I couldn't count how many times we'd feck up a simple pass under Ferguson, it's not by design, it's a limitation in his management and on the quality of players he signed, and it's the reason he has only 2 CL in about 30 yrs of management. Having said that, every style has it's flaws, but when you win more often that not, those flaws are masked.
Actually, in certain games, it has been mentioned by SAF and players that the team deliberately passes backwards to the centerbacks and keeps the ball there in order to draw the opposition players out and create more space to attack again. Not giving away the ball as mentioned earlier, though.
LVG alluded to that himself, that the Everton defeat was down to motivation.
Well sorry but isn't that his job? United should never ever be beaten because of motivation.
The last 2 defeats are on him
For better or for worse, the whole season is on him. He targeted a CL spot and I sincerely believe he will achieve his target.
West Brom playing against ANY top team would definitely have the less possession, why is it a problem when it happens to us? We did't lose because we had more of the ball, we lost because we didn't score with the chances we had. We created chances and had a penalty, on another day we could easily have put it away, like we did against Sunderland, Aston Villa and 90% of the smaller teams that came to OT this season. You could make this stupid argument against Chelsea and Everton, not on yesterdays' game. The lot of you lose your sense of rationality once the team is losing. We created chances, not sure what equates as clear, seeing as the opposition had 2 banks of 4 and 5.
I totally agree. We created some chances, but we didn't score them. As a team, we should be scoring more but we aren't. I'm sure the management is analysing the reasons for this and coming up with ways to fix it.
I'd say we've had 3, maybe 4 clear cut chances yesterday, one was penalty, one would be Paddy's header and there probably was something I've missed, that's just not good enough. Other than that it was shitty shooting at the keeper (with maybe 1-2 very good saves from him), blocked shots and hopeless crossing against 1,9x m centrebacks. That does not equal domination.
Let's put things in perspective here.
Shots on goal - 26
Shots on target - 9
That's creating chances no matter how you look at it.
West Brom only had 6 shots with 3 shots on target. Two were really good chances which went straight to De Gea and 1 took a horrible deflection into goal.
That's football, I guess.
I see this as karma for our lucky games earlier in the season where it was "miraculous" we didn't lose the game but won it instead. Now that lady luck has evened itself out against us, nobody can say we lucked it to 4th place.
From now on, I'd hope we can move on with the rest of the season. Two more wins to seal that last CL spot. Of course, the problems with cracking tight defences open still needs to be addressed.
It was an embarrassment.
Tactics that Big Sam would have been proud of.
First people were complaining we had no plan B. Now they're complaining we have a plan B.