KiD MoYeS
Good Craig got his c'nuppins
I'm not sure they do. He did real damage to the club.People seem to over exaggerate the impact Moyes had on the club.
I'm not sure they do. He did real damage to the club.People seem to over exaggerate the impact Moyes had on the club.
Moyes turned us into a laughing stock. Other teams still have the fear that LvG will all of a sudden get this team on a long winning run. They knew Moyes wouldn't. It will be interesting to see if they can keep the back 4 playing well and in one piece or if he will sign someone in January.I'm not sure they do. He did real damage to the club.
I'm nearly sure we'll sign someone in January. Probably Vlaar.Moyes turned us into a laughing stock. Other teams still have the fear that LvG will all of a sudden get this team on a long winning run. They knew Moyes wouldn't. It will be interesting to see if they can keep the back 4 playing well and in one piece or if he will sign someone in January.
It is, there's this myth that Ferguson always played eye-catching football all the time - not really the case. Our football this season is an improvement on what we have served up for the past 3 seasons atleast. We are playing well, and controlling games.
I actually agree with this. Id probably give him the next four games, ish, just because of the nature of the games, without gettign on his back too much about the results. That takes us to nearly the start of December. At around that point, some time in December or going into the New Year, we need to start seeing quite significant improvements.At some point very soon, we need to stop continuing to blame Moyes and start to hold LvG responsible for results. Yes, Moyes destroyed the team last season, but LvG has a new team to work with and plenty of time on the training ground to sort out his footballing philosophy. It's all good talking to the press, but what we need to see is results on the pitch.
Agree with you here.I know that under SAF in the latter years it wasnt always great but I think he had a perfect mix of winning and good football. I think with the new players some of you are exaggerating things a little. Yes it is a lot better than last season, but I still think United arent that dangerous, even with the supposedly dangerous players all on. Ironically this United kind of reminds me of us 2012/2013 under RDM and Benitez.
People seem to over exaggerate the impact Moyes had on the club.
I'd argue the underinvestment for a good few years caught up with us and did that more than anything or anyone, but that's for another thread.If anything it has been underplayed. He's set us back years.
I'd argue the underinvestment for a good few years caught up with us and did that more than anything or anyone, but that's for another thread.
I'd argue the underinvestment for a good few years caught up with us and did that more than anything or anyone, but that's for another thread.
Perhaps I am among those who would be willing to sacrifice some (not all, but some) of that attacking strength for any better applied concept of defending as a team. I wouldn't mind us winning 1-0 or 2-0 if we can see that improvement in how we suck the life out of the opposition, regardless of their level.
I read Balu's previous post. It's almost hard to conceive how LVG and Mourinho can be such polar opposites, and yet worked together. Building from front to the back is also contrary to what the old cliche in team sports would say about how to build a winning team.
Agree with that. We should have had Benatia wrapped up long before Bayern got involved. Benatia was available at the start of the transfer window because City had agreed on a price for him as a back up to Mangala.I actually agree with this. Id probably give him the next four games, ish, just because of the nature of the games, without gettign on his back too much about the results. That takes us to nearly the start of December. At around that point, some time in December or going into the New Year, we need to start seeing quite significant improvements.
FWIW I dont really hold Moyes particularly to blame for our poor form at the moment. Our confidence is still pretty shot but I dont really blame Moyes for that, a quick fix manager could have got us winning by now. But Van Gaal was never about the quick fix, he has tried to deconstruct us and then put us back together again with a different mentality, he talked about changing the way we think about the game and the way we make decisions on the football pitch. He said it would take time. So I put the fact we are still looking a bit disjointed down to that.
Plus I think we should have signed another, more experienced defender. Even if we had done that instead of signing Falcao, I think we'd have been better of investing the money there.
If anything it has been underplayed. He's set us back years.
I know that under SAF in the latter years it wasnt always great but I think he had a perfect mix of winning and good football. I think with the new players some of you are exaggerating things a little. Yes it is a lot better than last season, but I still think United arent that dangerous, even with the supposedly dangerous players all on. Ironically this United kind of reminds me of us 2012/2013 under RDM and Benitez.
Nice ad hoc hypothesis in order to now blame Moyes for LVs failings.
Its crazy that we are conceding less shots per game under Van Gaal than last season but conceding more goals. Have our opponents just become sharp shooters all of a sudden? Even against West Brom...Sessegnon will try and score as he did against us on Monday again, and 9 times out of 10 he'll shank it. Has De Gea's net got magnets in it?
Its crazy that we are conceding less shots per game under Van Gaal than last season but conceding more goals. Have our opponents just become sharp shooters all of a sudden? Even against West Brom...Sessegnon will try and score as he did against us on Monday again, and 9 times out of 10 he'll shank it. Has De Gea's net got magnets in it?
That stat is badly skewed thanks to that freak game against Leicester. 8 games is a way too small sample size anyway. Would be very interested in a similar comparison around Christmas
Yup it's the shots/goals stat that I was referring to. Over a season (or even half a season), that stat would smooth out but a freak results can widely skew it in an 8 game sample size.That will skew the total goals conceded stat but not the shots/goals stat. Unless we were conceding in really atypical types of goal in that game (which didn't seem to be the case)
Excited for him to play Fellaini as an attacking mid against Chelsea. It is funny that lately we seem to be reverting to the Moyes' tactic of just repeatedly sending crosses in.
Someone needs to stick a pin in his chair so that he finally gets up during games instead if sitting on his arse all game writing notes.
Is this still being discussed?
It's got nothing to do with our results.
Has it got anything to do with decisions, though?
I agree with your sentiment, but you do wonder if at times having an elite footballing royal (Van Gaal) on the touchline might make a difference in decisions going for/against us.
I noticed a trend, and it's worrying - the majority who are criticizing LVG now after 8 games were the very ones making excuses for Moyes and willing to go a few seasons of finishing outside the top four while he "grew into the job". I find that strange.
John Nicholson and Alan Tyers look at the Premier League's gaffers and how they come across on the telly. This week, it's Dutch coaching legend Louis van Gaal.
Philosophy
Likes his players to be thinkers. Who can spot the problem with this and English footballers? The intellectual football manager is not a creature native to Britain, and so the media have welcomed Louis van Gaal as if he were the brainiac love spawn of Stephen Hawking, Solomon and Leonardo da Vinci rather than just a clever, driven Dutch football bloke. Journos and fans alike have bought 100% into LVG's 'smartest man in the room' shtick - although nobody believes it quite so much as van Gaal himself.
Interview style
Exudes intellectual superiority, and indeed just superiority in general. Often seems to be talking interviewers through things as if tutoring a not-very-loved, rather slow child. Has a full range of ways of presenting himself to the world, including: haughty arrogance, weary arrogance, haughty weariness and laughing at his own jokes. All of this is splendid entertainment and positively encouraged by a media desperate for personalities - so long as the side is winning...
Suit, tracksuit or other
As befitting a manager steeped in the traditions of total football and interdisciplinary excellence, Van Gaal appears to feel equally at home in a sportswear or in his rather unimpressive collection of suits. Tailoring suggests a sack of potatoes tied with a rope around the middle. Sportswear invests him with the unselfconsciously downmarket, style-free look of an old man who would be happy going drinking in the estate pub wearing full tracky and trainers. Easy to imagine him in an early 90s garish shellsuit. For some reason, he puts half of this column in mind of a cheap Elvis impersonator who is attempting to do a lip curl. Has the compressed, squashed nose of a prize-fighter.
Can he talk the English?
Of course, though interestingly, and perhaps disappointingly, does not speak it with the cheery, endearing Dutchness which we all enjoy so much on the telly.
Cliché counter
No. Almost has the opposite problem, in that he is trying to communicate fresh ideas and concepts. As alluded to before, this is no small undertaking when your audience is English footballers (and indeed journos). Comical early-season experiments with a 3-5-2 made United fans cry out for 'a big man at the back' or 'a good engine' or, frankly, an 'if in doubt - boot it out'.
Proper football man?
Too brainy, too aloof, too much of an adult. Has surely never snipped off a neck-tie or crimped off a loaf into a team-mate's shoe. Mixture of arrogance, cleverness and foreign-ness will see him utterly friendless in the media when the time comes: he has no cheerleading squad of Top Tops or Martin Samuels upon which to fall back, and the fawning will turn to viciousness if the results don't improve. Indeed, quills are already being sharpened to paint him as typical of the sort of over-rated foreigner who is keeping plucky Brits out of a job, even despite recent history. Soon, you'd be forgiven for thinking Steve Bruce had won more trophies than LVG and the Human Rights Act should be invoked in order to give the United job to the equally squash-nosed Geordie.
Sacking ahoy?
By no means impossible that he could be out by the end of the season if they keep on needing late screamers to earn a point against the likes of WBA. The Van Gaal way requires time and patience, both on the pitch and on the training ground. Does the MUFC corporate machine have that luxury? Chance of him seeing our three-year contract seems odds against at the moment.
“Van Gaal is the kind of guy who can really make individual players better. It was the most important step of my career to go from Real Madrid to Bayern. It was the best move of my career, coming here and working under him. It really gave me a lot of confidence and a new way of working.
“You know his style – maybe it helped me because of the Dutch language – but the way he trains players means you have to adapt initially. Maybe that is why people are adapting in Manchester now, because the intensity is very high and you have to get used to it. But it was good for me because I got stronger, I got fit, and that was very important for my game.”
Van Gaal’s methods are taking time to work at United, with Chelsea arriving at Old Trafford as strong favourites to win the game but Robben says that Van Gaal’s doubters will be silenced sooner rather than later.
“He is the right man for United, definitely,” Robben said. “That is what I will always say. In the beginning, when it wasn’t going so well for him at United, people were asking me about it, but I will always tell them to have confidence in him. It will come, it just needs time. He has brought a lot of new players in, so he needs time to build, but he can really build a team.
“We have seen the perfect example of that here at Bayern, with what he did at this club. It is also shown with the national team, the steps he made to take us to third place in the World Cup and that wasn’t normal. It was a unique performance for Holland, but with United, he needs time. I like him, I am a fan of him and I know what he can do.”
Philosophy Likes his players to be thinkers. Who can spot the problem with this and English footballers? The intellectual football manager is not a creature native to Britain, and so the media have welcomed Louis van Gaal as if he were the brainiac love spawn of Stephen Hawking, Solomon and Leonardo da Vinci rather than just a clever, driven Dutch football bloke. Journos and fans alike have bought 100% into LVG's 'smartest man in the room' shtick - although nobody believes it quite so much as van Gaal himself.
This surprised me to, at the world cup he seemed very animated on the touch line but here he has looked reserved.One thing that has surprised me is the absence of the ironman persona with which I oafishly assumed he would strut around. There's a softness to him so far, compounded by that stillness on the bench. For me, too, the disappointing perception that he is either cavalier or complacent about dropping points as we transition in a way I didn't expect.
I noticed a trend, and it's worrying - the majority who are criticizing LVG now after 8 games were the very ones making excuses for Moyes and willing to go a few seasons of finishing outside the top four while he "grew into the job". I find that strange.