Liverpool - 2017/18

I think AOC was a bit of a reach, given he had only one year on his contract. I also think he was the only quick decision buy of Klopp, while everything else is planned more strategically and far in advance. Coutinho (and the Lallana injury, timeline?) forced their hand a bit. Klopp needed an insurance for Coutinho, not just in case of an early winter departure, but at that stage there were no guarantees what Coutinho would show up. If he had continued sulking with his bad back, Klopp needed some sort of short term solution with some upside and long-term squad/starting potential. That imho explains the fee. Otherwise they might have waited till the next summer to get him for free.

yes sure, tough to disagree with that, for me

fee looks a little bit high then, if my wiki figure is right
 
I can see how you might have that opinion as an oppo’ fan and that’s fair enough, but both those players have been very good for us, and well worth the money so far.

Liverpool fans trying to push this myth that Ox is this all new improved player. Like feck has he been worth the £40 million so far.
 
Klopp does seem to possess that innate ability to get the best out of his players, he has proven himself highly capable in this department with practically every purchase he has made during his time with Liverpool. But then it was never his man-management skills that were the issue, rather it's his tactical approach that has come under question. That's an entirely seperate issue though.

Liverpool find themselves in a similar situation to that of spurs, unable to compete financially with the behemoths of the PL such as those previously mentioned, so their transfer strategy requires more finesse (for lack of a better word), more time and significantly more effort. Furthermore it is eminently more risky when compared to the more conventional tried and tested "buying a ready-made superstar" approach.



It is very much true I'm afraid. For example, If United and Liverpool both take interest in the same player, his chosen destination is extremely likely to be United for obvious reason. If either Chelsea or City really wanted VVD, then they would have beaten Liverpool to his signature with little to no effort. That's a fact.

You're using hindsight to further your point I see. Look it's all well and good lauding the purchases of Salah, Mane and Firmino at this stage the season, after they have proven themselves to be capable signings, but how many Liverpool fans or associates could say with any degree of certainty that this would be the case prior the seasons start? Not a one if you are being honest. That's the problem with the "hidden gem" approach, it's success rate is, what, 50-50?

For what it's worth I utterly despise United's "scattergun" approach to tranfers post Fergies retirement, it wreaks of desperation it makes us no better than City or Chelsea when it comes to the destruction of the football worlds economy, but truth be told it is the safest approach - throw enough mud at the wall and some is bound to stick, so to speak. Shameful but effective.

United aren't finished yet either, Woody and Jose will continue to spend recklessly until the team is finally comlpete - in much the same way as Chelsea and City did. This is the modern game apparently and unless you have the financial power to buy yourselves the very best players money can buy, you will, eventually, be left behind.

Good post and I agree with it all. As for the bolded part, I believe Klopps stature and reputation for playing exciting football and making the most out of players abilites make us more competetive when it comes to transfers. I can’t imagine us being able to get a guy like Keita 3 years ago, for instance.
 
Liverpool fans trying to push this myth that Ox is this all new improved player. Like feck has he been worth the £40 million so far.

Love a cerebral argument. I’ll leave it there, as I said in my original post ‘that’s your opinion which is fair enough’.
 
I think AOC was a bit of a reach, given he had only one year on his contract. I also think he was the only quick decision buy of Klopp, while everything else is planned more strategically and far in advance. Coutinho (and the Lallana injury, timeline?) forced their hand a bit. Klopp needed an insurance for Coutinho, not just in case of an early winter departure, but at that stage there were no guarantees what Coutinho would show up. If he had continued sulking with his bad back, Klopp needed some sort of short term solution with some upside and long-term squad/starting potential. That imho explains the fee. Otherwise they might have waited till the next summer to get him for free.

What you are saying sounds very plausible but I remember the interest from Klopp in AOC goes all the way back to early 2016, if not even before, as was mentioned in some papers at the time. I had a quick google search and found this ESPN article from March 2016 http://global.espn.com/football/soc...ool-monitoring-alex-oxlade-chamberlain-source

So it seems that Klopp has been genuinely convinced that AOC will strengthen the squad rather than looking for a quick fix.
 
Of course it’s about opinions. But on what basis has Ox lived up to his £35 million price tag? He scored against City?

He had a year left on his contract, £35 million was a hefty sum. He has had some terrible games as well.
 
Of course it’s about opinions. But on what basis has Ox lived up to his £35 million price tag? He scored against City?

He had a year left on his contract, £35 million was a hefty sum. He has had some terrible games as well.
He was 23. Had 7 years PL experience. Came from a top4 rival. English international. He is versatile. And we needed him.

Look at the prices paid recently, and you will notice, that £35m gives you a squadplayer these days, unless you can reveal a gem. And that's exactly, what Ox is, a squadplayer. A pretty good versatile squadplayer imo.
 
He was 23. Had 7 years PL experience. Came from a top4 rival. English international. He is versatile. And we needed him.

Look at the prices paid recently, and you will notice, that £35m gives you a squadplayer these days, unless you can reveal a gem. And that's exactly, what Ox is, a squadplayer. A pretty good versatile squadplayer imo.

He had a year (or 6 months actually?) left on his contract, you overpaid. He hasn't proven anything.
 
He had a year (or 6 months actually?) left on his contract, you overpaid. He hasn't proven anything.
We don't really know if they've overpaid yet. I don't think one can judge a player after such a short amount of time. Regardless I'm sure Ox is happy to have left Arsenal. He is likelier to improve and shine in the Liverpool set up as it stands.
 
Just to get it straight I do think some of the Coutinho money will be available to spend however given the massive amounts Klopp has thrown around lately to believe there is a vault inside Anfield containing 140m ready for Klopp to use in the summer is naive and downright laughable.

It would be totally against the way the club has operated under this regime and fails to take into account the limited profit generated in comparison to other big club's. In addition the new stand, increased wages and arrival of another mega money signing in Keita.

A portion will be available but some has been spent and some will be lining the owners pockets.

Any search of Liverpool’s Balance Sheets since the FSG tenure will show that no Dividends have been paid to any Directors of the Company so the owners haven’t taken a bob. In fact Balance Sheet 1 shows outstanding debt upon acquisition being paid off by those said same owners.
Its impossible to know what money is available but Klopp does not seem to have the funds of Mourinho. At least he has not spent that much anyway so the “massive amounts Klopp has thrown around lately” is less than all others in top 6. Since he arrived, Klopp’s net spend is 5£m while United’s is 50 times that in the same period. Only City exceeds United’s spend.
 
He had a year (or 6 months actually?) left on his contract, you overpaid. He hasn't proven anything.

Hate to agree with you but when you talk both football and some sense, I will. In my opinion, we grossly overpaid; 1. For a player that had shown little at Arsenal & 2. Who had only a year left on contract.
He hasn’t done an awful lot to date to justify half that fee though has shown a little since Christmas.
Still not consistant and needs to show a hell of a lot more to consider himself to have a future at LFC.
 
If we keep signing tier 2 players like Mane, Firmino, Salah and Keita whilst our rivals settle on tier 1 players like Lukaku, Morata and Sandro, then I'll be quite happy.

We have a very good side now that looks like it's going somewhere. The players that are at Anfield want to be there and whilst we continue to play the football that we are currently playing, better players will want to join. We might only be able to sign "tier 2" players right now but that's not necessarily a bad thing when you have a manager like Klopp that can get the best out of them

Andy Roberston is the best level three player in the league la.
 
United aren't finished yet either, Woody and Jose will continue to spend recklessly until the team is finally comlpete - in much the same way as Chelsea and City did. This is the modern game apparently and unless you have the financial power to buy yourselves the very best players money can buy, you will, eventually, be left behind.

There's plenty of evidence to the contrary. Dortmund, Athletico, Spurs, Juve are teams who do not have great spending power yet are some of the best European sides in recent years. We have more money than any of those clubs and are now attracting players like VVD and Keita whom have top class potential.

Even many of Manchester City's current bunch of stars (Sterling, Sane, Jesus, Ederson) were not considered the finished article before they signed. There's plenty to be said for shrewd recruitment and top class coaching.
 
There's plenty of evidence to the contrary. Dortmund, Athletico, Spurs, Juve are teams who do not have great spending power yet are some of the best European sides in recent years. We have more money than any of those clubs and are now attracting players like VVD and Keita whom have top class potential.

Even many of Manchester City's current bunch of stars (Sterling, Sane, Jesus, Ederson) were not considered the finished article before they signed. There's plenty to be said for shrewd recruitment and top class coaching.

Sides like Dortmund and Atletico had their moments but they did not become consistent winners.
 
There's plenty of evidence to the contrary. Dortmund, Athletico, Spurs, Juve are teams who do not have great spending power yet are some of the best European sides in recent years. We have more money than any of those clubs and are now attracting players like VVD and Keita whom have top class potential.

Even many of Manchester City's current bunch of stars (Sterling, Sane, Jesus, Ederson) were not considered the finished article before they signed. There's plenty to be said for shrewd recruitment and top class coaching.

Very well put, there’s far too much economic reductionism in football these days. It’s as if that is the only consideration and completely ignores all the subtleties, and ‘human factors’ that go in to assembling and managing a competitive squad.

If it really was just all down to cash flow and economic might, then every club other than the big five or six might as well give up. Also, football isn’t about linear progression always, there’s no guarantee that spending a huge amount will actually make your side better, sometimes it can make you less competitive.

It’s very easy to fall into this trap of reductive reasoning, but life (and football) are never that simple.
 
Last edited:
Sides like Dortmund and Atletico had their moments but they did not become consistent winners.

They've both reached a higher level than any English club over the past 5 years (until City this year).
 
Yeah and City wont ever end up like the current Dormund.

Says who? They finished third last year and fourth the season before that, and until May have the same amount of league titles as them this decade.
 
What you are saying sounds very plausible but I remember the interest from Klopp in AOC goes all the way back to early 2016, if not even before, as was mentioned in some papers at the time. I had a quick google search and found this ESPN article from March 2016 http://global.espn.com/football/soc...ool-monitoring-alex-oxlade-chamberlain-source

So it seems that Klopp has been genuinely convinced that AOC will strengthen the squad rather than looking for a quick fix.

Oh I´m not saying he was not on Klopp´s radar, just that Klopp would have waited another year and gotten him for free. Coutinho throwing a tantrum forced Liverpool into a deadline day buy, where you always pay a premium. They have mostly avoided this since Klopp is in charge, if I´m not mistaken.
 
There's plenty of evidence to the contrary. Dortmund, Athletico, Spurs, Juve are teams who do not have great spending power yet are some of the best European sides in recent years. We have more money than any of those clubs and are now attracting players like VVD and Keita whom have top class potential.

Even many of Manchester City's current bunch of stars (Sterling, Sane, Jesus, Ederson) were not considered the finished article before they signed. There's plenty to be said for shrewd recruitment and top class coaching.

Of those clubs you mention only Juventus really stand out as a viable example. They are the most successful club in the history of Italian football regardless of their spending power (which is hardly poor by any stretch of the imagination). Dortmund won the title a couple of times before Bayern took control once again, Atheltico have won 1 title in 30 years and Spurs haven't won a league title in 50 odd years.

Point being there will always be the odd exception to the rule (Leicester winning the league against insurmountable odds, the Czech Republic winning the Euros or Porto winning the CL for example) but the reality is, at least in the modern game, the club that generates the highest turnover tends to be the most successful. Of course by that logic, these richer clubs will rightly have their success measured against their wealth, so the demand to procure silverware is that much more prevalent.

You need only take a glance at the current top 10 richest football clubs (I cannot give you a link from this phone unfortunately) and their relative success for evidence to the fact.
 
Last edited:
Good post and I agree with it all. As for the bolded part, I believe Klopps stature and reputation for playing exciting football and making the most out of players abilites make us more competetive when it comes to transfers. I can’t imagine us being able to get a guy like Keita 3 years ago, for instance.

Perhaps for that extremely rare breed of footballer whom does not covet a large salary above all else, the brand of football on offer may play a part, but they are rare. Great finds when discovered though.
 
How does Liverpool's points total compare with this stage last season?

This is a genuine question by the way, not a prelude to a Liverpool are shit post.
 
How does Liverpool's points total compare with this stage last season?

This is a genuine question by the way, not a prelude to a Liverpool are shit post.

This time last season (after 28 games) we had 55 pts., so we’re 2 points better off this season, having scored 5 more goals and conceded 3 less.
 
I think AOC was a bit of a reach, given he had only one year on his contract. I also think he was the only quick decision buy of Klopp, while everything else is planned more strategically and far in advance. .
Lots of people were saying it was a done deal as far back as may.
 
Lots of people were saying it was a done deal as far back as may.
I’m not so sure really. Klopp likes to have business done early so if it was almost done deal, he’d have been in the door on July 1st. The fact that it was Aug. 31st suggest to me that it was a slightly quick fix/panic buy. With Coutinho’s departure very much in the balance and every possibility that if he did stay, the circus would start again in January, Klopp decided to move for Ox. And please dont start me on the farcical price!!:confused:
 
I’m not so sure really. Klopp likes to have business done early so if it was almost done deal, he’d have been in the door on July 1st. The fact that it was Aug. 31st suggest to me that it was a slightly quick fix/panic buy. With Coutinho’s departure very much in the balance and every possibility that if he did stay, the circus would start again in January, Klopp decided to move for Ox. And please dont start me on the farcical price!!:confused:

I think you’re both right. He was a target for us for a while but we might well have waited for him but for the Lallana injury and the Coutinho unrest. Also, Chelsea came in for him at the same time. The price was fairly steep for a player entering his final year but, Arsenal wanted to keep him and would probably have let him run down his contract, as they seem to have with half their side.

Personally, I was happy we were in for him at the time, and happy now he’s a Red. Always thought he was a player with huge potential who was stagnating a little.

On the price, I find it difficult to get wound up about £35m. It’s an average fee these days for a good player.
 
I think you’re both right. He was a target for us for a while but we might well have waited for him but for the Lallana injury and the Coutinho unrest. Also, Chelsea came in for him at the same time. The price was fairly steep for a player entering his final year but, Arsenal wanted to keep him and would probably have let him run down his contract, as they seem to have with half their side.

Personally, I was happy we were in for him at the time, and happy now he’s a Red. Always thought he was a player with huge potential who was stagnating a little.

On the price, I find it difficult to get wound up about £35m. It’s an average fee these days for a good player.
I think that he has a lot to prove before he can be considered to be a good player. He has improved under Klopp but I still feel that he has a long way to go. Can be good, at times very good but then goes missing so maybe its a case of concentration to enable him to be consistant. City game was by far his best, a couple of other good games but for the most part, pretty anonymous imho. Hoping for more but I will be surprised should he ever become a regular starter.
 
The defence has definitely improved. In the last 16 PL games we have only conceded 14 goals.
 
The defence has definitely improved. In the last 16 PL games we have only conceded 14 goals.
Definitely. 4 wins and a draw with a score of 13-3 in the five games since the Swansea defeat. Looking steady both ways at the moment.
 
Last edited:
The defence has definitely improved. In the last 16 PL games we have only conceded 14 goals.

At the equivalent stage last season we had conceded 36 goals so we’re down 4 goals at this moment with 9 to play.
VVD and Karius have made a difference but too the departure of Coutinho from midfield. Of course he is a huge loss to us but, in truth, he offered little defensively from his midfield role. Not advocating that we should have 3 Henderson’s in there but, in a set up like ours with so many attacking, such a player as Coutinho would need our other 2 midfielders to be more box to box players like Keita. The problem now will be finding a Coutinho replacement and a Keita clone!!
 
The real question is, why does your offspring support Liverpool? :nono:
Good work sir.

Apologies, I would have commented earlier but only just saw it

For the record, I don't think my dad is on this forum, as he can barely work a typewriter let alone a computer.
 
Last edited by a moderator: