Salah is our best player this season and Mane was our best player last season. We were fine without Coutinho last season and we’ve been fine without him this season too. That’s not saying that we’re better off without him, just that we’ve coped well so far. We’re still creating plenty of chances and scoring plenty of goals (which is the area Coutinho had the largest influence on) and using a one off bad day at the office like Swansea doesn’t change that.
Let’s say we finish 3rd on around 80 points having not had Coutinho for more than half a season (he had a ‘back injury’ early on) then wouldn’t it be right to assume that not having him at the start of the 18/19 season would have little relevance on how we do next year? Suarez was comfortably our best player in 13/14 and as soon as he left we struggled. Coutinho hasn’t played for us in two months and our results/performances haven’t been any worse than they were.
I don’t see what Coutinho has to do with a 4-1 becoming 4-3 very quickly against City either. Was Coutinho being on the pitch going to stop us conceding two goals? Regardless, beating City was a very good result.
We were relying on the likes of Ings, Solanke and Chamberlain even when we did have Coutinho, and none of them have anything to do with our largest issue which is the defensive side of our play. There were games where we’d have Firmino, Coutinho, Mane and Salah all playing and would still have an off day in front of goal. Seeing as you’ve used a few ifs in your post, what if Mane, Firmino and Salah all stay fit for the rest of the season and then we buy someone in the summer to replace Coutinho, who turns out to be very good? Doesn’t that make his departure less comparable with the likes of Suarez and Alonso? We were noticeably worse when those players left, but we haven’t been so far since Coutinho went.
1000 word limit for the reply, I know what you’re like.
I understand full well that you're fine without him at the moment in terms of scoring and creating chances, I just find it incredibly odd that anyone would even bother trying to make out losing him was anything other than detrimental to your squad by hiding behind him not being
the best player for this season and the last, to the point of completely ignoring two seasons where he undoubtedly was your best. I know a bad day at the office at Swansea doesn't change that because you can still score hatfuls when it clicks, but it's not like you've kicked on a gear since losing him, it's just been more of the same.
Coutinho doesn't really have much to do with the City game, I only brought it up because SoT was holding it up as some sort of post-Coutinho achievement. It would have been a very impressive victory had you held on for 4-1, but instead you almost capitulated and it ended 4-3, and the narrative of what remains an impressive victory went from "Liverpool dominate City" to "Liverpool and City play out 7 goal thriller". This was then tarnished further by you going on to lose to relegation scrapping Swansea a week later, and being knocked out of the FA Cup, at home, to relegation scrapping West Brom the week after that.
I'm not sure what you're getting at with the hypothetical finish bit. You've got a good front three without Coutinho that will have carried you through. I'll readily admit that Coutinho was not as vital for you as Suarez, because I personally have never felt him to be close to the caliber of player that Suarez was for you in 2013/14. That doesn't mean he wasn't one of your key players though. While there's always the "if" of your front three staying fully fit for a whole season, the reality is that it is very unlikely to happen, particularly not if you want to continue to compete in the league and CL. Something will have to give somewhere, or you'll find that they've been run into the ground two thirds of the way into the season.
I'm personally not convinced that you'll get on fine without him come next season because I can't see the three you have maintaining their current levels without attracting serious interest from Barca/Real/PSG/Bayern (delete as applicable), but that's if you don't really do anything about replacing him. If you bring in a comparable replacement, of course it'll hugely negate any impact of him leaving.
In reference to Suarez and Alonso, your performances dipped because there was no concrete plan to replace them. Benitez pissed off Alonso in an attempt to sign Barry, with you ending up with perma-crock Aquilani after he left. I'd also say you dropped off a cliff in 09/10 because there was a huge hangover from the season before where you'd given it your all to stop United winning their 18th, and ultimately fallen short. When Suarez left you tried to attract Sanchez (why you didn't just steadfastly refuse unless Sanchez was part of the deal I'll never know), and ended up scattergunning the market, leaving you with Balotelli as a wildcard signing. Should you bring in a proper replacement, it'll be a completely different scenario to the departures of the other two, because they weren't properly replaced.
As it is, we're not actually that far removed from him leaving, so I think we're all best leaving any real evaluations of the impacts of his departure until at least the end of the season because otherwise we end up talking in ifs and buts.