Liverpool - 2017/18

The lack of understanding between both sets of fans regarding the other club's situations is astounding. United fans fail to understand that for Liverpool, consistency has been their biggest frailty over the past 10 seasons and they would gladly take a couple of seasons without a trophy but given it atleast shows a bit of consistency in terms of establishing Liverpool as a top 4 team. After they have consolidated that, they can think about going bigger and targeting trophies.

Liverpool fans fail to understand that with Sir Alex, United's success was measured only in trophies; 2nd place, 3rd place etc didn't count for anything if the season went trophyless. That ruthlessness to win was something that got lost with the retirement of Sir Alex. So for United to win the League Cup and Europa League last season was a big deal even if they ended the season in 6th because it showed that the desire to win trophies was still there.

Both sets of fans have different expectations of their teams and justifiably so. Liverpool fans want consistency because that's what they have been lacking since the mid 00's, with all the managers coming and going and changes of ownership. United have always had that consistency but what fuels their desire, because they are used to it, is winning trophies so they won't be satisfied with 4th place if they don't win a trophy.
 
I mean, it's good for banter (which is what this page is about), but end of the day, I don't go home and jack off with tissue paper, imprinted with United's trophy wins.

To be fair, and I mean no disrespect, but you're in the US and seem just a little detached from the emotional investment of a fan close to the club.

Seeing your team win a cup final might be the greatest memory someone has of their team. It may have been the greatest live spectacle they've ever experienced. To discard that as equivalent to wanking into tissue paper probably shows the division in the camps here.

I think for a lot of fans the sport is nothing more than a 90 minute distraction on their laptop that they fit into their lives like episodes of Games of Thrones or indeed PornHub. For others it's so much more than that.
 
Think CL qualification will start losing the importance it once had. The loss in revenue from CL isn't as significant as before because of the burgeoning commercial and TV deals. And it isn't really stopping the bigger clubs attracting quality players, Liverpool got Mane, Wijnaldum, Coutinho when they didn't have CL and Arsenal managed to buy Lacazette, Kola, and PEA without it. Even Utd got Pogba when they were out of it.
With respect to winning trophies resulting in a virtuous cycle of winning more trophies thats true only if the team winning it is already at the required level for competing, as it'll give just the smidgen of confidence to go on to winning bigger things. However if its a Wigan or Portsmouth, winning the FA cup means sweet fa. Even when Arsenal won the FA cups, it was through defeating Hull and Aston Villa in 2014 and 2015. Only last years win was creditable as we had to beat City and Chelsea on the way. But we failed to build on that because of the mess surrounding AOC and Sanchez - not that we'd have had any chance this season anyway, with City playing like this.
 
Sometimes I wonder why fans quibble over trophies they will never hold. But sports isn't rational, is it?

End of the day, if you're overly fixated on what is won at the end of the season, with no regards for what goes on every matchday, and the actual sport on the pitch, you're missing the point. In England, a maximum of 4 teams can win trophies every season. That doesn't invalidate the experience of supporters of the other 16 clubs.

Speak for yourself mate but I've held the Premier League, FA Cup and Champions League trophies. Wouldn't have had that opportunity if United hadn't won the things.

I get your point, but it's simply not true that football is about what happens on matchday and the sport that happens on the pitch. Wigan fans were chuffed when they won the FA Cup, even though they got relegated, and I've seen numerous Portsmouth fans state that they wouldn't swap their FA Cup win even if it meant still being in the Premier League. They won so

If it were all about entertainment and playing good football, no one would care about anything other than the very top level of the game. As it is, people turn up week in, week out, some travelling from one end of the country to the other, all to watch objectively shite football. They know the quality is shit, they know they could tune into Sky Sports from the comfort of their sofa and watch something of an objectively higher quality, in a lot of cases, they know the chances are almost certain that their team is going to lose, but they still go.

Football is a game all about hoping to win things. What a team's fans hope to win is measured differently, but it's there. Manchester United fans go into a season hoping they can win every competition they're entered in. Another team's fans might go into a season hoping to do the double over their local rivals. Fans of a non-league club might hope that their team gets far enough in the FA Cup to have a chance at a Premier League scalp.

It is of course all relative, but at the end of the day it's all about hoping your team wins something, be it a trophy, a derby match against your local rivals, or even the chance to do something historic (reach a cup final, beat a PL team in the FA Cup, the reigning champions at their own ground, etc.).

An Everton fan has never looked back at a season and gone "you remember that time we lost 3-2 to Liverpool but played really entertaining football, that was fecking brilliant, I wish I could relive that again?" but they might well look back at a shithouse 1-0 win over them with the result secured by a dodgy 96th minute own goal after failing to register a single shot on target and having just 25% possession, and want to do it all again.

Arsenal fans hid behind the "we play the best football" line for years, and now a large portion hate their legendary manager and have wanted him sacked for a number of years. Liverpool fans are hiding behind it now, and despite apparently not caring about the apparent "minor" trophies, still like to trot out the "two cup finals in his first season" line about Klopp, as if losing is supposed to impress anyone.
 
To be fair, and I mean no disrespect, but you're in the US and seem just a little detached from the emotional investment of a fan close to the club.

Seeing your team win a cup final might be the greatest memory someone has of their team. It may have been the greatest live spectacle they've ever experienced. To discard that as equivalent to wanking into tissue paper probably shows the division in the camps here.

I think for a lot of fans the sport is nothing more than a 90 minute distraction on their laptop that they fit into their lives like episodes of Games of Thrones or indeed PornHub. For others it's so much more than that.

None taken.

Maybe that explains it. There are a sliver of teams for which, if they won a major title, I'd run down the street naked.
 
The lack of understanding between both sets of fans regarding the other club's situations is astounding. United fans fail to understand that for Liverpool, consistency has been their biggest frailty over the past 10 seasons and they would gladly take a couple of seasons without a trophy but given it atleast shows a bit of consistency in terms of establishing Liverpool as a top 4 team. After they have consolidated that, they can think about going bigger and targeting trophies.

Liverpool fans fail to understand that with Sir Alex, United's success was measured only in trophies; 2nd place, 3rd place etc didn't count for anything if the season went trophyless. That ruthlessness to win was something that got lost with the retirement of Sir Alex. So for United to win the League Cup and Europa League last season was a big deal even if they ended the season in 6th because it showed that the desire to win trophies was still there.

Both sets of fans have different expectations of their teams and justifiably so. Liverpool fans want consistency because that's what they have been lacking since the mid 00's, with all the managers coming and going and changes of ownership. United have always had that consistency but what fuels their desire, because they are used to it, is winning trophies so they won't be satisfied with 4th place if they don't win a trophy.

This is why it's laughable though. Liverpool fans, and now you, talk about Liverpool going "a couple of seasons without a trophy" as if they've been winning FA Cups, League Cups and Europa Leagues every season or two for the last 10 years, when the reality is they've won precisely one trophy since 2006. They've won one League Cup in 10 years, and also spent the best part of that 10 years outside of the top 4.

We're supposed to believe that they are now deliberately forgoing trophies, despite having won just the one since 2006, because they are looking to establish themselves in the same top 4 that they were last established in at a time when they were winning trophies on a semi-regular basis. It's utter nonsense.

With the strength at the top of the table in England now, the only way to establish yourself as a top 4 team is to challenge for the league year in, year out. It's why we've seen every top 6 team bar City miss out at least once over the last few seasons, and why not even United in 2nd are guaranteed a top 4 spot this season. Liverpool fans can't say that their team isn't capable of winning trophies because they need to establish themselves as a top 4 team, but completely ignore that literally no team in the league aside from City can call themselves an established top 4 side. Even then City only managed to finish 4th in 2015/16 on goal difference.

"Playing entertaining football", "getting established in the top 4", whatever excuse you want to use, it's just that, an excuse. Top sides and top managers win trophies, it's as simple as that.

I also don't get this obsession with CL qualification. I want to win the thing. Arsenal spent 10 years qualifying for it as an "established top 4 club". That's gone well for them.
 
SFA to who?

The players who get a medal to put in their cabinet? Even the very very few players who only care about money, I'm sure they all get bonuses for winning trophies.

The fans? The ones who go to the final and the millions more watching around the world hoping for a positive result?

The club? Who get to add another trophy to their cabinet?

There is far more to it, but no club who has won a cup has regretted it. Look at it from your own club's perspective. Everyone remembers the "Michael Owen final" but your top two finish? Its either regret (Liverpool fans) or opposition fans pissing themselves with laughter (Facts rant and Gerrard's slip).

Success breeds success. Look at Real, they didn't win a Champions League for ages, they won one, then went on and won two more. Is this the best madrid side of all time? No, the last two times they won it, they weren't even all conquering throughout the season. But the players know what it takes to win and they went on to do so.

No one is saying that a domestic trophy is a basis for league/CL success, but winning smaller trophies will help, not hinder, a club's chances to go on to further success.
No, I meant SFA for the reason there is any debate at all here ... in that it led to more success in the PL/CL, which it didn't. And which is what the debate was all about. All the reasons you gave above are totally moot since clearly the club has regressed not progressed.
 
No, I meant SFA for the reason there is any debate at all here ... in that it led to more success in the PL/CL, which it didn't. And which is what the debate was all about. All the reasons you gave above are totally moot since clearly the club has regressed not progressed.

Why are Arsenal used as the barometer?

They are just one case and a big outlier.

Domestic cup success clearly correlates with league and European success.

As usual you're totally wrong.
 
Winning trophies should be important to managers and players at the top end of the game because it’s their job. It’s performance based like any job and they’re all judged on their performances. They all want to look in their cabinets to see the medals they’ve won, not the pretty football they played at Bournemouth.

It’s not really what football should be about for fans though is it? I mean we’re not going to stop supporting our clubs even if they go the next 30 years without winning anything.
 
Why are Arsenal used as the barometer?

They are just one case and a big outlier.

Domestic cup success clearly correlates with league and European success.

As usual you're totally wrong.

The fact of the matter is, if you're good enough to compete in the league and champions league regularly, then you're good enough to win the cups.

If you're not good enough to compete in the league or the champions league regularly, then you're likely not good enough to win the cups.

Do teams that aren't good enough to win the league and champions league regularly, win the cups? Yes, but not as often as teams that are good enough.

Do teams that are good enough to win the league and champions league regularly, go season after season without winning a cup? Yes, but that's because they're usually winning leagues and champions leagues in the meantime.

Sometimes, teams that aren't really good enough to win the league or champions league regularly win the league or champions league in a one-off season of good performances (see Leicester 2015/16, Chelsea whatever year they won the CL for recent examples), but by and large, if you're good enough to win the league, you'll win the odd cup here and there, and if you're not winning cups, then the chances are you're not good enough to, and no amount of "entertaining football" or "establishing ourselves" can disguise that.

Winning trophies should be important to managers and players at the top end of the game because it’s their job. It’s performance based like any job and they’re all judged on their performances. They all want to look in their cabinets to see the medals they’ve won, not the pretty football they played at Bournemouth.

It’s not really what football should be about for fans though is it? I mean we’re not going to stop supporting our clubs even if they go the next 30 years without winning anything.

Not for all clubs, no, but for fans of clubs like Liverpool that pride themselves on what they've won, and not just what they've won, but how much they've won, to be going "ah well it's alright if we go thirty years without a trophy because we played some nice football" is just insane.

People watch season after season because every August marks a new chance at winning something, no matter how small that chance may be. Fans of teams newly promoted to the Premier League don't stop watching because they know the odds of survival are stacked against them, but they also don't keep watching because they're expecting nice football. They watch because they've got at least two chances of beating United, Liverpool and Chelsea, and because there's a chance they prove everyone wrong and survive and they get to do it all again next year.

Maybe we'll never agree on this, but I find it absolutely bizarre that Liverpool fans are talking about it being okay to not be win anything because they might finish 4th, and I'd find have found it weird if you'd said it any time over the last 10 years.
 
I think Liverpool have just won so little in the last 12 years that they've just gotten used to being a team that wins nothing.
 
The lack of understanding between both sets of fans regarding the other club's situations is astounding. United fans fail to understand that for Liverpool, consistency has been their biggest frailty over the past 10 seasons and they would gladly take a couple of seasons without a trophy but given it atleast shows a bit of consistency in terms of establishing Liverpool as a top 4 team. After they have consolidated that, they can think about going bigger and targeting trophies.

Liverpool fans fail to understand that with Sir Alex, United's success was measured only in trophies; 2nd place, 3rd place etc didn't count for anything if the season went trophyless. That ruthlessness to win was something that got lost with the retirement of Sir Alex. So for United to win the League Cup and Europa League last season was a big deal even if they ended the season in 6th because it showed that the desire to win trophies was still there.

Both sets of fans have different expectations of their teams and justifiably so. Liverpool fans want consistency because that's what they have been lacking since the mid 00's, with all the managers coming and going and changes of ownership. United have always had that consistency but what fuels their desire, because they are used to it, is winning trophies so they won't be satisfied with 4th place if they don't win a trophy.
I think you are unaware of the history of both clubs if that's what you take from it.
 
We're supposed to believe that they are now deliberately forgoing trophies, despite having won just the one since 2006, because they are looking to establish themselves in the same top 4 that they were last established in at a time when they were winning trophies on a semi-regular basis. It's utter nonsense.

No one is saying that. Its about the hypothetical question of 'would you rather'.
 
I get your point, but it's simply not true that football is about what happens on matchday and the sport that happens on the pitch. Wigan fans were chuffed when they won the FA Cup, even though they got relegated, and I've seen numerous Portsmouth fans state that they wouldn't swap their FA Cup win even if it meant still being in the Premier League. They won so

It is of course all relative, but at the end of the day it's all about hoping your team wins something, be it a trophy, a derby match against your local rivals, or even the chance to do something historic (reach a cup final, beat a PL team in the FA Cup, the reigning champions at their own ground, etc.).
.
Of course it is about winning. My point was that it is not just about winning trophies in may. Winning the derby etc is exactly what I meant about the matchday experience. But the manner in which you win also impacts that.

I am no purist. I can readily appreciate grinding out a 1-0 win. Yet I enjoyed our naively optimistic Roy of the rovers league Challenge in 14 more than our 2001 treble. The almost childlike joy of our weekly wins in the way we did it was just something special. We probably play better football now, but it's not quite the same as that was.

Yes trophies adds a lot. But if it were all that mattered lots of fans of smaller teams should just pack it in.
 
Not for all clubs, no, but for fans of clubs like Liverpool that pride themselves on what they've won, and not just what they've won, but how much they've won, to be going "ah well it's alright if we go thirty years without a trophy because we played some nice football" is just insane.

People watch season after season because every August marks a new chance at winning something, no matter how small that chance may be. Fans of teams newly promoted to the Premier League don't stop watching because they know the odds of survival are stacked against them, but they also don't keep watching because they're expecting nice football. They watch because they've got at least two chances of beating United, Liverpool and Chelsea, and because there's a chance they prove everyone wrong and survive and they get to do it all again next year.

Maybe we'll never agree on this, but I find it absolutely bizarre that Liverpool fans are talking about it being okay to not be win anything because they might finish 4th, and I'd find have found it weird if you'd said it any time over the last 10 years.
So what do you want Liverpool fans to be like? We have literally no control over the club winning trophies so whilst it’s frustrating if we don’t win anything, I’m perfectly fine with supporting my team still and enjoying the nice football we play if/when we play it.

If in 30 years time our trophiphobia hasn’t abated, I’ll still be happy supporting my team every season.
 
You can appreciate the irony though of Liverpool fans deciding trophies aren't the be all and end all right at the point they stop winning trophies.
 
No one is saying that. Its about the hypothetical question of 'would you rather'.

I've seen multiple Liverpool fans on this very forum state that the cups have being very much playing second fiddle to "establishing yourselves in the top 4" with it often being accompanied by some sort of mention of how good you are to watch. It's always in discussions about the apparent progress you're making under Klopp, but it's been mentioned multiple times how the cups don't matter as long as you finish in the top 4.

It doesn't have to be a case of would you rather, which is precisely the point made by many United fans on here, and finishing 4th without winning anything is precisely the thing Arsenal were laughed at for doing for a decade.

Of course it is about winning. My point was that it is not just about winning trophies in may. Winning the derby etc is exactly what I meant about the matchday experience. But the manner in which you win also impacts that.

I am no purist. I can readily appreciate grinding out a 1-0 win. Yet I enjoyed our naively optimistic Roy of the rovers league Challenge in 14 more than our 2001 treble. The almost childlike joy of our weekly wins in the way we did it was just something special. We probably play better football now, but it's not quite the same as that was.

Yes trophies adds a lot. But if it were all that mattered lots of fans of smaller teams should just pack it in.

And my point has been that while the derbies are important, they should be playing second fiddle to actually winning trophies for clubs that pride themselves on how many trophies they've won.

By all means enjoy playing entertaining football and winning derbies, but the point all along has been that for actual top clubs, that doesn't cut the mustard for long. As Rafateria has enjoyed saying in this thread, ask Arsenal. The problem Arsenal now face is that they went so long without challenging for or winning anything, that despite winning three of the last four FA Cups, the perception is that they've fallen too far behind the best teams in the country that there is no way back, at least not under Wenger, and their fan base can be described as, at best, restless as a result. There is also, in this instance, an argument that winning these cups has papered over some rather large cracks that have appeared in the same time frame.

I've already addressed the smaller teams. It's all relative, and I'd expect fans of a team that fancies themselves amongst the best in the country to want their team to win trophies. I'd expect fans of a team that finish mid-table to want their team to do well against local rivals, pick up a scalp or two from their games against the top sides, and maybe find their way to a cup final.

As you said, football is about winning, so who cares about the financial implications of finishing in the top 4 if it means that you have no silverware to celebrate? Who cares about the calibre of player you may be able to attract (but not really because there are at least three richer teams in the division and more overseas) with a 4th placed finish if the team you have now can lift trophies every few seasons? I get the importance of qualifying for the CL and the desire to see your team in it, but why not want and demand both? This "ah well at least we got 4th" attitude is utterly foreign to me.

I simply don't see what there is to be gained by making it an either-or issue regarding league finish and silverware. It strikes me as little more than a convenient line of argument adopted by fans of teams not winning anything to try and place them alongside the teams that are winning things.

So what do you want Liverpool fans to be like? We have literally no control over the club winning trophies so whilst it’s frustrating if we don’t win anything, I’m perfectly fine with supporting my team still and enjoying the nice football we play if/when we play it.

If in 30 years time our trophiphobia hasn’t abated, I’ll still be happy supporting my team every season.

I'm more than happy for you all to just idly accept that you aren't winning anything, I just find it incredibly odd for fans of a club like Liverpool that have spent year after year celebrating their rich history of winning trophies and being, up until very recently, the most successful club in English football history.

You might not have won a league title in my lifetime, and you might have won only three major trophies since I started secondary school fourteen years ago but Liverpool are and will always be United's main rivals to me, regardless of how much City might win. I grew up in a town that was roughly 50/50 between United and Liverpool fans (North Wales coast) due to the number of people who'd moved from each respective city and them being the two nearest big teams.

You lot turning us over 4-1 in 2008/09 was awful, and the elation I felt when we got back on track and secured the title will remain with me forever. I've also never felt as sick and done with football as I was in 2013/14 when it looked like you were on course to win your first league title in forever, the season after Fergie retired, while we, as reigning champions, languished in 7th, completely helpless to stop you. Gerrard slipping and Dwight Gayle's equaliser then Suarez's subsequent audible sobbing remain my second favourite thing about that tumescent season (the first being the brief 30 seconds I thought we were knocking Bayern Munich out of the CL). Twice a season we play you and twice a season I can honestly say that the result of the game will affect my day, with the same not being true for any other team.

I'd love it if you went 30 years without winning anything else. I'd love it if you did a Leeds and slipped out of the PL altogether. That doesn't mean I can't find it completely alien that, at this current moment in time, you're all sat here talking about finishing 4th instead of winning anything as if it's a marker of success. Arsenal's patented top 4 trophy, Spurs' recent "nearly had a title challenge" cup, and now Liverpool's "we play better football than you" shield don't and never will stand up to actual, proper silverware.

I'm not expecting anyone to stop supporting the club they support, but I do find it increasingly absurd when fans of supposed top clubs start discussing the money their team gets from finishing 4th and the subjective attractiveness and entertainment values of the football played as being more valuable than seeing their team actually lifting silverware.

I can't stop you from enjoying watching Liverpool play, because I know I'd still be watching United if we did a Leeds ourselves and ended up clogging it up in League One, but I just don't get it. I know it was something of a cliche and a meme, but I miss the "next year is our year" Liverpool. You were shite for a good chunk of it, but you truly believed that a couple of refereeing decisions, a small run of luck, or the right signing or two would propel you to the pinnacle of English football. The end was nigh for United with every minor setback, and now you're all sat around going "4th would be a success but even if we miss out, as long it's narrowly and we gave it a good go I'm willing to give him another shot at it next year" and writing off the last two trophies you won as nothing.
 
now you're all sat around going "4th would be a success but even if we miss out, as long it's narrowly and we gave it a good go I'm willing to give him another shot at it next year" and writing off the last two trophies you won as nothing.

Circumstances and context change. Back then, LFC were an established top four club, in a four club league. Since 2009, we've effectively been in the wilderness and Spurs and City have made that into a top six. Klopp came into a side which finished 7th behind West Ham and was losing 6-1 to Stoke.

The priority is to re-establish ourselves at the top end of the table and in the CL. A cup isn't a barometer with which you can measure that kind of progress, so it's not a priority for Liverpool right now. We might not have won anything yet but it's clear we've undoubtedly been on an upward trajectory under Klopp. That's why he has such strong support.
 
Circumstances and context change. Back then, LFC were an established top four club, in a four club league. Since 2009, we've effectively been in the wilderness and Spurs and City have made that into a top six. Klopp came into a side which finished 7th behind West Ham and was losing 6-1 to Stoke.

The priority is to re-establish ourselves at the top end of the table and in the CL. A cup isn't a barometer with which you can measure that kind of progress, so it's not a priority for Liverpool right now. We might not have won anything yet but it's clear we've undoubtedly been on an upward trajectory under Klopp. That's why he has such strong support.
Exactly. What's the point of worrying over exits in the domestic cups, if we're not competitive in PL and not participating in CL?

Sure it's nice winning a cup. I would love it to happen!

But if we're not competing in PL and CL, then we should be! PL and CL defines a good or a bad season. All other cups are icing on the cake. What's the point of icing, if you don't have a cake?
 
I think you are unaware of the history of both clubs if that's what you take from it.

I am very aware of the history between both clubs, I've been following United since '96, but that still shouldn't rule out rationality. I don't understand blindly hating another club/country because they have a historical rivalry.
 
Why are Arsenal used as the barometer?

They are just one case and a big outlier.

Domestic cup success clearly correlates with league and European success.

As usual you're totally wrong.
It's actually hilarious that Alex99 of all people explained it to you perfectly above.

Clubs winning domestic trophies usually do so because they are good enough to challenge in the PL and CL, winning those trophies isn't creating a basis for a run at the CL / PL though for teams that haven't been for some time, and Arsenal aren't the outlier, it's rather perverse to right them off in that way since they are the modern day proof.
 
Speak for yourself mate but I've held the Premier League, FA Cup and Champions League trophies. Wouldn't have had that opportunity if United hadn't won the things.

I get your point, but it's simply not true that football is about what happens on matchday and the sport that happens on the pitch. Wigan fans were chuffed when they won the FA Cup, even though they got relegated, and I've seen numerous Portsmouth fans state that they wouldn't swap their FA Cup win even if it meant still being in the Premier League. They won so

If it were all about entertainment and playing good football, no one would care about anything other than the very top level of the game. As it is, people turn up week in, week out, some travelling from one end of the country to the other, all to watch objectively shite football. They know the quality is shit, they know they could tune into Sky Sports from the comfort of their sofa and watch something of an objectively higher quality, in a lot of cases, they know the chances are almost certain that their team is going to lose, but they still go.

Football is a game all about hoping to win things. What a team's fans hope to win is measured differently, but it's there. Manchester United fans go into a season hoping they can win every competition they're entered in. Another team's fans might go into a season hoping to do the double over their local rivals. Fans of a non-league club might hope that their team gets far enough in the FA Cup to have a chance at a Premier League scalp.

It is of course all relative, but at the end of the day it's all about hoping your team wins something, be it a trophy, a derby match against your local rivals, or even the chance to do something historic (reach a cup final, beat a PL team in the FA Cup, the reigning champions at their own ground, etc.).

An Everton fan has never looked back at a season and gone "you remember that time we lost 3-2 to Liverpool but played really entertaining football, that was fecking brilliant, I wish I could relive that again?" but they might well look back at a shithouse 1-0 win over them with the result secured by a dodgy 96th minute own goal after failing to register a single shot on target and having just 25% possession, and want to do it all again.

Arsenal fans hid behind the "we play the best football" line for years, and now a large portion hate their legendary manager and have wanted him sacked for a number of years. Liverpool fans are hiding behind it now, and despite apparently not caring about the apparent "minor" trophies, still like to trot out the "two cup finals in his first season" line about Klopp, as if losing is supposed to impress anyone.

Wonderful post.
 
It's actually hilarious that Alex99 of all people explained it to you perfectly above.

Clubs winning domestic trophies usually do so because they are good enough to challenge in the PL and CL, winning those trophies isn't creating a basis for a run at the CL / PL though for teams that haven't been for some time, and Arsenal aren't the outlier, it's rather perverse to right them off in that way since they are the modern day proof.

The point is winning domestic cups is correlated to wider success.

And the rationale that it would act as a basis for other success is also sound.

Your players gain experience of ‘lose and you’re out’ high stakes football, an element of football somewhat stripped away in the league.

Young players gain a taste of success and what it feels like to win, therefore driving appetite for more. (If they’re ambitious)

Your team learn how to close out a tournament under pressure, a vital element so clearly missing from the likes of this Liverpool team, and Spurs.

You learn how to be tough to beat.

Therefore it’s absolutely no surprise that domestic achievements correlate highly with wider achievements, as the behaviours used to achieve them are exactly what’s required to close a league or European campaign.
 
I know Football is tribal and all that but, like with those Spurs' threads last season a lot of you guys are telling supporters of another team that they should not be happy or excited about their team and then get surprised when they disagree with you.
 
The point is winning domestic cups is correlated to wider success.

And the rationale that it would act as a basis for other success is also sound.

Your players gain experience of ‘lose and you’re out’ high stakes football, an element of football somewhat stripped away in the league.

Young players gain a taste of success and what it feels like to win, therefore driving appetite for more. (If they’re ambitious)

Your team learn how to close out a tournament under pressure, a vital element so clearly missing from the likes of this Liverpool team, and Spurs.

You learn how to be tough to beat.

Therefore it’s absolutely no surprise that domestic achievements correlate highly with wider achievements, as the behaviours used to achieve them are exactly what’s required to close a league or European campaign.
The whole point is that winning domestic trophies doesn't correlate to wider success. In fact it could be argued that even just getting to a final (since results can be arbitrary and decided by poor refereeing etc.) fulfils virtually all of the benefits you have listed above because to get there those attributes would have been necessary. Look back at a list of recent winners and finalists in the FAC (mostly Chelsea and Arsenal are winners but the list includes Portsmouth and Wigan and Everton, Stoke, Villa, Palace and Hull in the finals) that's hardly a high quality list is it and certainly I would say it's merely an addendum to Chelsea's (and City's) recent honours and was in no way whatsoever the platform for them. For Arsenal and any others on that list it meant nothing as a stepping stone to perform at a higher level simply because it wasn't in them to, so they didn't go on to perform at a higher level.

Same applies to the LC who's recent winners include Swansea and Birmingham, and finalists include Cardiff, Bradford, Southampton, Villa and Sunderland, hardly an advert for the argument are they. For me personally I think it's a rather archaic theory to postulate winning the FAC or LC has any bearing on a club's performances in the PL/CL and clearly the list of winners/finalists endorses that argument, in fact it underlines, capitalises and writes in bold that it has zero effect.
Does anyone actually think that making the final in any of those is better preparation than Liverpool's run to the EL final beating United, Dortmund and Villareal over two legs ? Those were real learning experiences and demanded real fighting qualities under extreme pressure. The final is another matter but in itself shouldn't demean what it took to make it therein the first place.

This has nothing to do with the satisfaction it gives to fans, a nice shiny thing to add to the trophy room or anything else, I have no argument with that side of the debate. If Liverpool were to win one of course I'd be very happy and enjoy it immensely, but I'd also be under no illusion that it had any bearing whatsoever on future growth/potential in the competitions that really matter.
 
The whole point is that winning domestic trophies doesn't correlate to wider success. In fact it could be argued that even just getting to a final (since results can be arbitrary and decided by poor refereeing etc.) fulfils virtually all of the benefits you have listed above because to get there those attributes would have been necessary. Look back at a list of recent winners and finalists in the FAC (mostly Chelsea and Arsenal are winners but the list includes Portsmouth and Wigan and Everton, Stoke, Villa, Palace and Hull in the finals) that's hardly a high quality list is it and certainly I would say it's merely an addendum to Chelsea's (and City's) recent honours and was in no way whatsoever the platform for them. For Arsenal and any others on that list it meant nothing as a stepping stone to perform at a higher level simply because it wasn't in them to, so they didn't go on to perform at a higher level.

Same applies to the LC who's recent winners include Swansea and Birmingham, and finalists include Cardiff, Bradford, Southampton, Villa and Sunderland, hardly an advert for the argument are they. For me personally I think it's a rather archaic theory to postulate winning the FAC or LC has any bearing on a club's performances in the PL/CL and clearly the list of winners/finalists endorses that argument. Does anyone actually think that making the final in any of those is better preparation than Liverpool's run to the EL final beating United, Dortmund and Villareal over two legs ? Those were real learning experiences and demanded real fighting qualities under extreme pressure. The final is another matter but in itself shouldn't demean what it took to make it therein the first place.

This has nothing to do with the satisfaction it gives to fans, a nice shiny thing to add to the trophy room or anything else, I have no argument with that side of the debate. If Liverpool were to win one of course I'd be very happy and enjoy it immensely, but I'd also be under no illusion that it had any bearing whatsoever on future growth/potential in the competitions that really matter.

Yes it does.

The last few Copa del Reys have been shared between Real, Barcelona and Atletico.

The last few German Cups mostly Bayern with Dortmund featuring.

The last three Italians cups all won by Juventus.

Arsenal are the outlier in that their domestic cup success hasn’t carried over into other competitions.

It’s simply wrong that domestic success doesn’t correlate with wider success.

The behaviours involved are exactly what’s needed to win more widely.

I’m not thinking of players like Carrick or Valencia after we’ve won cups. I’m thinking of Martial, Rashford, Lingard etc. Those players need tastes of success to drive their ambition. They need to learn how to close out tournaments. They need to shake a losing mentality that says it’s ok not to win, let’s just take part and pray for top 4.
 
You keep saying, that we don't care about winning. Are you not reading the responses? Winning is important. But winning the major trophies is the most important. Of course the small cups matters, but not very much compared to PL and CL. They are not major trophies imo. The important numbers here are 18-5, and 20-3.

You talk about Arsenal like they were a joke, when they always finished fourth.. So tell me, what are they now, with their recent succes in the domestic cups? Their fans sure don't look happy despite 3 FA Cups in four years..

There is a reason, why Liverpool and Tottenham fans overall are happy for the time being, despite no silverware. They feel, that their clubs are moving in the right direction, they get decent results, and they play some good football quite often..

Neither Arsenal, or you guys, seem to enjoy it very much, despite your recent silverware.

I don't think Liverpool are in a position to diss Arsenal whatsoever. Sure over the last year or so you have been a bit better without having anything to show for it, but are you playing better football? Arsenal play nice football as well. Interestingly enough, both your clubs have nothing to show for the last ten years because you are unable to mix a good attack with a good defense. Liverpool are moving in the right direction, which you guys have been saying for 27 years now. To be honest, I feel Liverpool are as far away from winning the Premier League as they have ever been. You need defensive cohesion, not just good players - and Klopp will never put out a defensive unit that will do well over 38 games.
 
Question: would you rather win the FA Cup finishing 5th whilst playing dreadful football, or finish 2nd/3rd/4th winning nothing and playing very good entertaining football?
 
Question: would you rather win the FA Cup finishing 5th whilst playing dreadful football, or finish 2nd/3rd/4th winning nothing and playing very good entertaining football?

Sort of extremes there. It's like asking would you rather win FA cup, finishing 5th playing dreadful football or finish in relegation places playing very very high entertaining football.

Just saying this as few said they want to be entertained first.
 
Sort of extremes there. It's like asking would you rather win FA cup, finishing 5th playing dreadful football or finish in relegation places playing very very high entertaining football.

Just saying this as few said they want to be entertained first.
I’m only asking because winning the FA Cup wasn’t enough to save Van Gaal and a lot of United fans were glad to see the back of him.

Winning a trophy didn’t seem to matter much then and I’m wondering why?
 
Yes it does.

The last few Copa del Reys have been shared between Real, Barcelona and Atletico.

The last few German Cups mostly Bayern with Dortmund featuring.

The last three Italians cups all won by Juventus.

Arsenal are the outlier in that their domestic cup success hasn’t carried over into other competitions.

It’s simply wrong that domestic success doesn’t correlate with wider success.

The behaviours involved are exactly what’s needed to win more widely.

I’m not thinking of players like Carrick or Valencia after we’ve won cups. I’m thinking of Martial, Rashford, Lingard etc. Those players need tastes of success to drive their ambition. They need to learn how to close out tournaments. They need to shake a losing mentality that says it’s ok not to win, let’s just take part and pray for top 4.
Simply every one of your examples is of clubs already dominant in their leagues - what is the point of trying to use them as an example of a team that hasn't won a league title or CL title recently, climbing to that higher level ? It's pointless and irrelevant and in facts just highlights the point I made earlier - that dominant teams can win trophies because that's what they are but it's not the basis for their success in their leagues or the CL ! What is relevant is that there isn't an example of a non-dominant team then going on to success in the PL/CL because domestic cup success doesn't equal success in the PL/CL.

Your last paragraph is simply an unprovable opinion. None of that improves the quality of the players and beating or playing mostly minor PL or Championship teams in domestic cups literally means nothing preparation wise compared to playing against top European competition.

Answer the question, what would be a greater learning experience, winning the LC or Liverpool's EL matches against United, Dortmund and Villareal ?
 
I’m only asking because winning the FA Cup wasn’t enough to save Van Gaal and a lot of United fans were glad to see the back of him.

Winning a trophy didn’t seem to matter much then and I’m wondering why?

Oh in that case I agree. When you don't see progress, it's better to part ways.
 
Just reading over a few posts here, it is obvious that there is a huge misunderstanding or lack of knowledge even about the present status of both Clubs. Many United fans are still of the opinion that they are at the top table in European football and they are in every way but for footballing quality. You are the richest Club, some of the best players but you are not at the footballing level you were at, though I dont think it would take an awful lot to put you back up there! Thats not having a go at you, thats just how I see it. I dont engage in a slagging or jeering here as its quite pathetic and childish really (anyone who has read my posts here, all 33, will know that!!).
Liverpool are in a completely different stratosphere than United. Of course I’d love to see us win a trophy but at our stage of development, it is more important that we finish top 4 this season than if we had won the League Cup and even the FA Cup as well. The reasoning behind that is that only with a sustained run playing CL football can we raise the capital to purchase and pay salaries of the higher level player who themselves would consider us as we are in the CL. We cannot always unearth a Coutinho or a Salah. Pulisic will probably be on the move this summer, will he want to play CL football next season or would he be content to play for a team who has won a League Cup or an FA Cup but not in CL?
Football has changed form the day Shankly said “If you are First your are first, if you are second, you are nothing”. Now even 4th is a laudable achievement in an increasingly competitive league particularly for teams like Liverpool, Spurs and Arsenal. A sustained run in CL gives us the financial might to attract better players and and build a better squad - Only then can we challenge for the league and domestic cups.
 
Simply every one of your examples is of clubs already dominant in their leagues - what is the point of trying to use them as an example of a team that hasn't won a league title or CL title recently, climbing to that higher level ? It's pointless and irrelevant and in facts just highlights the point I made earlier - that dominant teams can win trophies because that's what they are but it's not the basis for their success in their leagues or the CL ! What is relevant is that there isn't an example of a non-dominant team then going on to success in the PL/CL because domestic cup success doesn't equal success in the PL/CL.

Your last paragraph is simply an unprovable opinion. None of that improves the quality of the players and beating or playing mostly minor PL or Championship teams in domestic cups literally means nothing preparation wise compared to playing against top European competition.

Answer the question, what would be a greater learning experience, winning the LC or Liverpool's EL matches against United, Dortmund and Villareal ?

The League Cup is a different kettle of fish I reckon as it’s more a great training ground for younger players in order to prepare them for bigger tests. The latter stages often against bigger teams are great experience for closing tournaments. I guess it depends who you faced. If you closed a league cup having played a two leg semi against United and a final against City, it could be that was the greater learning curve.

Earlier in the thread Liverpool fans were disparaging the EL, now it’s being held up as an achievement and the evidence of wider success. Goalpost shifting again.

Of course you didn’t win that and it also adds to the evidence that you bottle it when it comes to closing out tournaments.

So on one hand it’s good evidence and a bit like a failed league campaign a few nice wins along the way, on the other hand holding it up as an achievement goes against everything we’ve been arguing about.
 
The League Cup is a different kettle of fish I reckon as it’s more a great training ground for younger players in order to prepare them for bigger tests. The latter stages often against bigger teams are great experience for closing tournaments. I guess it depends who you faced. If you closed a league cup having played a two leg semi against United and a final against City, it could be that was the greater learning curve.

Earlier in the thread Liverpool fans were disparaging the EL, now it’s being held up as an achievement and the evidence of wider success. Goalpost shifting again.

Of course you didn’t win that and it also adds to the evidence that you bottle it when it comes to closing out tournaments.

So on one hand it’s good evidence and a bit like a failed league campaign a few nice wins along the way, on the other hand holding it up as an achievement goes against everything we’ve been arguing about.
Well talk about goal post shifting ! The debate is about whether or not domestic cups are a platform for further success and you now attempting deflection since the cold hard facts of FAC/LC final participation has swung that argument decisively against you.

You have neatly avoided all the facts I gave you about the current (recent) lack of quality of the FAC/LC competitions and also that no team has used them as a platform for PL/CL success, which is what certain posters here were suggesting.

And well done again in your attempt to pervert the comments on how the EL has been more useful to promote all those qualities you listed. Incidentally participation in the CL would have the same benefits whether actually challenging to win it or not.

You are such a straw-man disciple. Stick to the principle of the debate (does the FAC / LC provide a platform for non-successful clubs to achieve success in the PL/CL) or don't bother.
 
Last edited:
Oh in that case I agree. When you don't see progress, it's better to part ways.
So domestic cups like the FA Cup are important to an extent but that importance has limits depending on the context of the season.
 
So domestic cups like the FA Cup are important to an extent but that importance has limits depending on the context of the season.

Yeah but when that stretches to lot of seasons then there is a problem. Obviously winning PL or CL is the most important but it never hurts to pick up few domestic cups before the team is capable of winning league.

Arsenal were always laughed at even when they finished in top 4, they were laughed at when they won domestic cups because they never challenged for PL or won PL in long time.