I have no problem why Otamendi-Romero was Scaloni’s choice going into the cup. Saying any of them are more involved in the build up is just nonsensical, though. Como es tu español? Sure they didn’t say they wanted the players who had been more involved in the build up to the tournament?
I don’t think it’s strange a few of us are in disbelief how our best player this autumn can’t get a spot in this Argentinian team. However, apart from Messi and Di Maria, CB is now their strongest position. Otamendi has been great for the NT, and Romero is a very solid all round player.
I think some are surprized fir the same reason I am: Seeing Romero out of sorts gifting Saudi Arabia two goals, and Martinez come in and shore up defence, then having total control together with Otamendi vs Mexico and becoming increasingly important in the build up were midfielders and full backs were calamitously weak on the ball (Acuña, De Paul, Rodriguez and Montiel). It’s fair to say Martinez was one of Argentina’s best three players in that game, andon merit deserved to start the next game.
Fair play, Argentina made changes before Poland game, and had no defensive troubles at all, so Scaloni has made good. I think it’s fair to say, though, that the main reason for that was a stand-offish Poland and bringing in controller Enzo Fernandez, hard working Alvarez, and going with Molina ahead of Montiel.
Push comes to shove, I don’t think CB choice is the position that will decide Argentinas fortune this year. It’s the collective solidity and the attacking pieces around Messi, as usual.