- Joined
- Aug 4, 2022
- Messages
- 91
- Supports
- Ajax
I didn't expect such a World Cup at his age. Chapeau
Why? He has been incredible for PSG this season in terms of goals and assists. Above both Mbappe and Neymar statwise.
I didn't expect such a World Cup at his age. Chapeau
YepYou are aware Maradona took Argentina to two World Cup finals? What are you even talking about on that front? And the 'argument' for Maradona is that he performed virtual miracles for the greatly unfancied in Napoli and Argentina. His club feats are equally phenomenal and never reduced to 'oh he won so few trophies' in an era where talent was not densely concentrated into a handful of superteams per league. The only teams remotely capable of true trophy hauls in 80's serie A were Juventus and AC Milan, you either know this already, or, you're not qualified to use the argument you're using which, coincidentally, omits this small tidbit of vital information.
Let's we get our shit back together again then.It's going to be so anti-climatic when he retires. Mbappe can't hold a candle. Think we've got 10-15 years in no man's land. Probably a bit like mid nineties to mid 2000s, but without a Ronaldo.
No penalty but the stars are aligned for Argentina. England never has this luck.
True and France should also be absolutely roasting them down both flanks, but Messi has a lot of room to work against that midfield and a very nervous CB. Should be an interesting contest (if it happens).On the other side I think Giroud will have some fun in the air.
yeah but we're not talking about following a team here, we're talking about an individual. So surely your analogy is flawed?Because it all comes down to winning. People didn't start following Manchester United just for the pretty football.
Na, a lot of the mystique legendary players possess is doing it in the biggest of stages. There’s nuance though since Messi playing well means Argentina wins. If Argentina don’t win then Messi wouldn’t have played well imo.If HE loses? It's a team game mate, a lot will come down to his team mates as much as it is on Messi.
Well I mean he has done literally everything he can to get them to the final... If he puts on a performance in the final and they still lose, that shouldn't really reflect his entire career.
We're talking about history, legacy, so its the same for bothyeah but we're not talking about following a team here, we're talking about an individual. So surely your analogy is flawed?
At this point he doesn't even need to win the World Cup to be the best ever. He's carried this team to the final more than Maradona did when they won it. Didn't need to cheat with a handball either.
The Netherlands pretty much set the template on how to score against them, and Giroud is a lot better than Weghorst and you have Griezmann on the crosses.True and France should also be absolutely roasting them down both flanks, but Messi has a lot of room to work against that midfield and a very nervous CB. Should be an interesting contest (if it happens).
Well he is clearly doing it at the moment and hopefully he has another incredible performance on SundayNa, a lot of the mystique legendary players possess is doing it in the biggest of stages. There’s nuance though since Messi playing well means Argentina wins. If Argentina don’t win then Messi wouldn’t have played well imo.
You can’t come out on the losing side of the biggest game in all of sports..twice.. not make your mark and be called the greatest. Especially when the argument against Messi being criticised for not guiding his side to a World Cup was the quality of his teammates. Reaching two finals says different.
Now if he has a worldie and loses then fair enough but that’s not likely to happen.
Say they face France and Mbappe owns it. That’s incredible for his legacy and gives him a real foot hold to challenge GOAT status by the time he retires. It works both way, it’s rarified air we’re seeing right now
How many shots did great players of the past need to play well at a World Cup final never mind the greatest player of all time in Messi?Because….margins & team sport.
hes got a lot more done in terms of both history and legacy outside of a "1 off match" IMO. But i hear where youre coming from. I just dont agree with it.We're talking about history, legacy, so its the same for both
I mean, use 2014 as an example. Higuain scores, messi assist (iirc?) and his legacy is cemented. It's margins. So you can dominate every single match up to the final and say....di Maria scores the winner and Messi does nothing. Is his legacy cemented because they won and someone else stepped up (for 1 match in a tournament?)How many shots did great players of the past need to play well at a World Cup final never mind the greatest player of all time in Messi?
You either step up or you don’t. It’s not like we aren’t seeing him dominate the World Cup as we speak so it’s not exactly down to random chances here
How many shots did great players of the past need to play well at a World Cup final never mind the greatest player of all time in Messi?
You either step up or you don’t. It’s not like we aren’t seeing him dominate the World Cup as we speak so it’s not exactly down to random chances here
Anything can happen in a one off game. As I've said before I think Morocco can beat France, it's not a given.And yet Argentina have already lost to Saudi Arabia. So they can obviously lose to France. Even with Messi having as good a tournament as he’s had so far. That’s football.
And the team were criticised for their performance?And yet Argentina have already lost to Saudi Arabia. So they can obviously lose to France. Even with Messi having as good a tournament as he’s had so far. That’s football.
So basically you are saying whether a player can be considered the greatest or not comes down to a single match. Never mind the fact he's played in over 1000 and has scored nearly 800 goals and won countless trophies. But it all rests on one match, in a team sport where there are 10 other players who need to perform too. Nah, don't think soNa, a lot of the mystique legendary players possess is doing it in the biggest of stages. There’s nuance though since Messi playing well means Argentina wins. If Argentina don’t win then Messi wouldn’t have played well imo.
You can’t come out on the losing side of the biggest game in all of sports..twice.. not make your mark and be called the greatest. Especially when the argument against Messi being criticised for not guiding his side to a World Cup was the quality of his teammates. Reaching two finals says different.
Now if he has a worldie and loses then fair enough but that’s not likely to happen.
Say they face France and Mbappe owns it. That’s incredible for his legacy and gives him a real foot hold to challenge GOAT status by the time he retires. It works both way, it’s rarified air we’re seeing right now
Need to score them
The man is 35 years old.
Cut the shit. Seriously. If Argentina don't win this final it does nothing to diminish his status in the game. Nothing. No other player in history, including Maradona, bears the weight of dragging Argentina to a WC win with an all-time classic tournament performance at the age of 35. No one.
Maradona was a shadow of his '86 self at 34 years of age, yet, apparently Messi needs to do not only what Maradona did during his peak, but also what Maradona didn't do after his peak.
Just enjoy that Messi is giving the tournament of a lifetime at an age when every other historically great player has faded.
How wide do you think the margins are when discussing literally the greatest players of all time?So basically you are saying whether a player can be considered the greatest or not comes down to a single match. Never mind the fact he's played in over 1000 and has scored nearly 800 goals and won countless trophies. But it all rests on one match, in a team sport where there are 10 other players who need to perform too. Nah, don't think so
The man is 35 years old.
Cut the shit. Seriously. If Argentina don't win this final it does nothing to diminish his status in the game. Nothing. No other player in history, including Maradona, bears the weight of dragging Argentina to a WC win with an all-time classic tournament performance at the age of 35. No one.
Maradona was a shadow of his '86 self at 34 years of age, yet, apparently Messi needs to do not only what Maradona did during his peak, but also what Maradona didn't do after his peak.
Just enjoy that Messi is giving the tournament of a lifetime at an age when every other historically great player has faded.
No.At this point he doesn't even need to win the World Cup to be the best ever. He's carried this team to the final more than Maradona did when they won it. Didn't need to cheat with a handball either.
He could retire right now and still be the greatest. If they win it on Sunday that will be the cherry on top of the best career in football history. If they don't, he still has had the best career and been the best player I've ever seen. I hope they do win because then there will be no more arguments to be had even from the most anti-Messi people. It simply won't be a discussion anymore.How wide do you think the margins are when discussing literally the greatest players of all time?
Not for the Argentinians.Messi has a far better legacy than Maradona though, he is head and shoulders at club level.
Debatable but even if they did, they would find some way to bottle it.No penalty but the stars are aligned for Argentina. England never has this luck.
Tbf, i don't think anyone ever will.Not for the Argentinians.
That will change if they win on Sunday I think though Maradona will always be a god to them.Not for the Argentinians.
He could retire right now and still be the greatest. If they win it on Sunday that will be the cherry on top of the best career in football history. If they don't, he still has had the best career and been the best player I've ever seen. I hope they do win because then there will be no more arguments to be had even from the most anti-Messi people. It simply won't be a discussion anymore.
yeah but we're not talking about following a team here, we're talking about an individual. So surely your analogy is flawed?
You're the prime example of why someone shouldn't venture in unknown territories without real knowledge.Messi has the most goals and assists combined in club football history, most world player of the year wins, insane amount of league titles and 3 arguably 4 Champions league titles. Pretty much the best player in the world for a 10 year period. He is soon to become the number 1 for goals scored in football history, and already holds the most assists in football history.
Just because Maradona was able to go one game further in 1 World Cup game makes him better? Literally 1 game when Messi has played over 1000. Copa America win that Maradona doesn't have. Got Argentina to a second World Cup final.
Maradona also only has 3 league titles in his entire career. People are clutching at straws if they think Maradona is better.
The man is 35 years old.
Cut the shit. Seriously. If Argentina don't win this final it does nothing to diminish his status in the game. Nothing. No other player in history, including Maradona, bears the weight of dragging Argentina to a WC win with an all-time classic tournament performance at the age of 35. No one.
Maradona was a shadow of his '86 self at 34 years of age, yet, apparently Messi needs to do not only what Maradona did during his peak, but also what Maradona didn't do after his peak.
Just enjoy that Messi is giving the tournament of a lifetime at an age when every other historically great player has faded.
Semi retirement to USA no doubt.If Messi wins the world cup, I reckon he retires after this season.