Stocar
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2011
- Messages
- 708
Seriously? His ability to stand his ground and keep control of the ball is unmatched.Messi doesn't excel in physical duels
Seriously? His ability to stand his ground and keep control of the ball is unmatched.Messi doesn't excel in physical duels
He isn't weak and he is hard to get the ball from, especially because of his low center of gravity, but you won't see him physically bully opponents like Ibra does for us nowNever watched Pele so dont want to participate in that specific argument but this is wrong, one part of game that is often unnoticed, he is one of the strongest players in the world and he is winning 50:50 duels more often then not.
He isn't weak and he is hard to get the ball from, especially because of his low center of gravity, but you won't see him physically bully opponents like Ibra does for us now
(although he did kick Maicon's tooth out one time)
Paul Scholes said:So these are some of the little things that you learn when you play against the man himself which you might not see on the television. First off, he never speaks on the pitch. In fact, I don’t think I ever heard him say a word. Second, you won’t believe how strong he is for a little man.
Pretty sure it is the way he did it rather than who he did it to that impresses people. I don't know what football you watch but it's not like any random mid table team in any of the big leagues gets their ass handed to them like that by a single player very often.
Again, what are you saying is that Messi's skills in playmaking, scoring and dribbling make him the best ever - and I never disputed that. But there were a few attackers who I'd definitely call more complete - at least two, Pele and Cruyff. The likes of Gullit or Ronaldinho were more complete too, for example, even though there weren't as good.Well, I wouldn't say that body mass is that important aspect of offensive game, cause your perception of strength boils up to that. Nor heading ability, for that matter. Those are useful qualities, but playmaking, scoring and dribbling are most important by far IMO. Anyone can see players of old today. Even more than before since coverage was scarce back then. And I really don't see anyone as good as Messi.
He isn't weak and he is hard to get the ball from, especially because of his low center of gravity, but you won't see him physically bully opponents like Ibra does for us now
What you're talking about I'd still classify as his skills in controlling the ball. The physical duels I'm talking about are of a different kind
(although he did kick Maicon's tooth out one time)
He doesn't even enter most - and I don't expect him to win a loose ball in 50/50. Most of the times he doesn't need it and his movement and close control allows him to ignore that aspect of the game, but when we're talking about the most complete attacker ever, I have to count this ability too.Well it depends what do you classify under physical duels, if he wins most of his duels and holds the ball against players that are on first glance physically much stronger then him then id say he excels in physical battles
I agree there is definitely an argument for the likes of Cruyff and Gullit as most complete players overall. They were able to play multiple roles and positions on pitch. But as an offensive force, Ronaldinho at his best edges both IMO, and Messi all of them. Hence my argument for him being most complete offensive player.Again, what are you saying is that Messi's skills in playmaking, scoring and dribbling make him the best ever - and I never disputed that. But there were a few attackers who I'd definitely call more complete - at least two, Pele and Cruyff. The likes of Gullit or Ronaldinho were more complete too, for example, even though there weren't as good.
Ok... the tackling on the Suarez goal is ridiculously poor. Inesta cleanly beats 3 guys prior to Messi getting the ball.
And the other goal is in the 90th minute against a tired team trying to attack.
We all know Messi is a cut above... But I don't quite get the fawning over he's been getting over this.
My first thought too, honestly.A normal haircut, finally!
If you don't understand the "fawning" over another phenomenal performance by the best player the world has ever seen, then you don't really understand football, do you?Ok... the tackling on the Suarez goal is ridiculously poor. Inesta cleanly beats 3 guys prior to Messi getting the ball.
And the other goal is in the 90th minute against a tired team trying to attack.
We all know Messi is a cut above... But I don't quite get the fawning over he's been getting over this.
Think about it. He dribbled 4 defenders inside the space of a small bathroom in a cheap apartment. That is a rare feat that no other player can do at this level. Sure, Hazard, Sanchez, Iniesta can dribble in short spaces nicely, but they don't dribble almost half a team at once like Messi does. Messi has an unmatched ability of making a great dribbling run even more spectacular. He is the kind of player that can dribble half a team at once.
And I don't think Espanyol players are sleeping in their boots. They look pretty sharp to me, which is the reason why after 4 dribbles Messi still can't shoot freely.
No, i meant big games. And i didn't say messi hasn't been good in big games. Just that the other two were betterI just read earlier that Messi has scored the most amount of goals, has the most assists and the most hattricks in the history of El clasico. He's also done pretty well for himself in every single CL final he's ever played in, which we sadly know all to well.
But I guess you mean NT games only when you say big games.
Conversely, the rules and refereeing have also changed, going from being excessively skewed towards the defence to slightly skewed in favour of the offense. Individual quality of defenders is also at an all-time lowOn the flip side of things, collective defending is a whole new barrier nowadays. Teams are way more organized. Defensive players press together covering for each other leaving positions. I'd say you'd need good dribbling and quickness of thought more. Messi wins here.
Agreed. I have tried to discuss in the first paragraph of my post.Conversely, the rules and refereeing have also changed, going from being excessively skewed towards the defence to slightly skewed in favour of the offense. Individual quality of defenders is also at an all-time low
Very well put!I've been watching football since early 90s, and don't buy the story about better defending in old days. Defending is an aspect of the game that has ever steadily evolved, as it is more dependent on system and preparation, and less on talent. There is so much more intensity and athleticism in the game today, compared to few decades before. Football is indeed quicker.
And even in that context Messi dribbles, passes and scores more, and at rate never seen before. His control, quickness and instinct are simply beyond comparison, it's plain to see. As it stands, he's the best that's ever played the game.
I love both, but for me Messi is way more complete. Maradona had a better control in my eyes.
And Messi is way more consistent.
To be blunt, that's a load of bollocks.When Messi goes down it's a foul every time, even when he dives. Every other foul on him is a yellow card. He's so protected by the refs that players are scared to even touch him.
He's a great player, probably the best in this generation, but I'm trying to imagine him 30 years ago and it's just not happening. For me he's got nothing on Maradona. No one has.
My only criticism towards Messi is he has become too casual. He doesn't play with the same intensity and anger as between 2008-2012 and the 14/15 season. Being anonymous against Real but then good against Osasuna and Espanyol doesn't cut it for me. I want to see Messi bossing big games again but like I said, he's become too casual this season.
When Messi goes down it's a foul every time, even when he dives. Every other foul on him is a yellow card. He's so protected by the refs that players are scared to even touch him.
He's a great player, probably the best in this generation, but I'm trying to imagine him 30 years ago and it's just not happening. For me he's got nothing on Maradona. No one has.
Seriously? His ability to stand his ground and keep control of the ball is unmatched.
Ummm.... Where are his abs then? Bro he's a midget too... Do you even see him ever taking his shirt off after scoring?
Another stupid Messi fanboy destroyed. Case closed.
To be blunt, that's a load of bollocks.
Not at all like Messi. At least one of those 3 would have been ordered to shadow him even in the sh*tter, and they'd systematically brutalize him. Messi never had to deal with Gentile, Bergomi or Baresi spending 90 minutes trying to slow him down by punching him in the ribsHe would be brutally, and tightly marked by up to 3 men, just like Messi.
A clear example of that kind of defense is his goal against England.
No, I wasn't using them as examples, I used them because they repeatedly admitted to doing that against maradonaYou clearly don't know what type of player Baresi was, nor Bergomi for that matter, when you take them as examples of such type of defending.
Messi's no fragile flower, granted, but we have no way of knowing how he'd have coped in the 80s because he never had to, and never will. And it is a fact that football was harder for forwards in the 80s than it is now.And actually, Messi doesn't shy away from physical aspect of game, and handles fouls well. The way some people talk about 'old days', one would think players spent more time on stretchers than on the pitch, because of brutality of tackles. It wasn't anything like that. In fact, players of today are better physically prepared and more resistant to injuries, so they would arguably handle rough tackles even better. (Although there are being overplayed and game is becoming extremely physically demanding, so that plays into getting more injuries.)
Then how come Messi has repeatedly struggled against tight, aggressive and physical man-marking througout his career?Anyway, Messi would thrive if he had a single player assigned to him compared to being closed down by organized and athletic defences.
He never struggles in 1 on 1 situations. 1 on 1 he is basically unstopabble. He is regularly closed down by multiple defenders though, generally quicker and more athletic than back in the days, when that type of organized defending was not present. Even in that difficult context, he excels at dribbling past defenders. His control, quickness and instinct are unmatched, it is plain to see.Then how come Messi has repeatedly struggled against tight, aggressive and physical man-marking througout his career?
He's repeatedly struggled against man-marking. Having an opponent stuck to him all the time, anywhere on the pitch, being very aggressive and physical. It happened against colombia in the copa america 2011, against inter in the CL semifinal, against chile on copa in 2015...he doesn't do well against overly aggressive defending when he's not given the chance to shake off the defender.He never struggles in 1 on 1 situations.
It wasn't present in England. Maradona spent most of his career in Italy, and more specifically, in the greatest defensive league of all time. Modern day defending has nothing on '80s italian defendingwhen that type of organized defending was not present.
He is being more objective than Barcelona fans are when it comes to Ronaldo.Its hard for Madrid fans to be objective on Messi. They constantly try to undermine his talent.