Mercurial
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2017
- Messages
- 2,568
Kane going other direction?Bought a huge house near Spurs training ground a matter of months ago.
Fact.
Kane going other direction?Bought a huge house near Spurs training ground a matter of months ago.
Fact.
Shirt sale worldwide would recover much of that.
Kane going other direction?
It’s on.
Our owners lap up marketability aspects.FFS not this nonsense again
Not so much shirts per se as much as marketability appeal, popularity and such. No denying it he would strengthen the 'brand'. Can't say I have exact knowledge of our income % pie charts but I bet a substantial amount of it is from that segment.But its not true, the shirt sales myth still being a thing in 2018 is frankly bizarre.
He would be dead to me if he did that forever.Injury prone maybe but he said in his interview he’s been fit all season except the start.
Sometimes you have to take a chance and he’s worth taking the risk on. Exactly the player we need right now. City are after a RW by the looks of it. I can see him going there if he did leave Real Madrid.
Of all the players of seasons past like Falcao, Injured Zlatan, etc i'd think taking a chance on Bale makes sense. If he stays fit the ROI will be astronomical and can spark a new great era.Injury prone maybe but he said in his interview he’s been fit all season except the start.
Sometimes you have to take a chance and he’s worth taking the risk on. Exactly the player we need right now. City are after a RW by the looks of it. I can see him going there if he did leave Real Madrid.
Bale has averaged 2227 minutes per season over the last 3 seasons after averaging 3752 minutes per season for the previous 3 seasons. He's on 600k/week wages until June 2022. That's roughly 125m in wages plus an 80m transfer fee for his services until June 2022.
For the same wages and double the transfer fee, United could add four 21-26 year old players on 150k/week wages to the first team until June 2022. Buying declining players and their 600k/week contracts that run until June 2022 is not squad building, imo.
No chance re Kane.
There's rumours Bale might be coming back to Spurs.
I can't see it. It would mean spurs blowing a huge part of their summer budget on one player when we need a CB, CM too etc
That said, Bale is a match winner and putting him in the current Spurs side would make us title challengers no doubt. Is he the marquee signing Levy wants for the new stadium opening?
We have first refusal and the right to match any bid Madrid accept. Bale has always left the door open to come back to Spurs.
And he has just bought a house in Chigwell. Why would he do that if he wasn't coming back? Strange.
The day he becomes available we should be front of the queue. What he did last night doesn't matter. Dude is provenOk, I've had my doubts, but that performance against Liverpool was basically the ultimate United audition.
Issued a 'come get me' plea in his post match interview.
Give him what he wants and lets bring this fine lad home to the PL.
What say you lot?
Brilliant player who is injured a lot of the time and has a contract until 2022. Madrid have no reason to sell unless he really pushes hard to leave and if he does he'll cost more than what they paid for originally. If he wasnt an injury risk I would've been fine with it but hes a glass man whos turning 29 in a few weeks so I dont think he would be a good investment at this stage.
Our owners lap up marketability aspects.
Bale has averaged 2227 minutes per season over the last 3 seasons after averaging 3752 minutes per season for the previous 3 seasons. He's on 600k/week wages until June 2022. That's roughly 125m in wages plus an 80m transfer fee for his services until June 2022.
For the same wages and double the transfer fee, United could add four 21-26 year old players on 150k/week wages to the first team until June 2022. Buying declining players and their 600k/week contracts that run until June 2022 is not squad building, imo.
Shirt sales have not, and will never, funded any transfer. It's an utterly ridiculous myth peddled by Madrid and makes zero sense on any scale.
the segment that includes retail, merchandising, apparel and product licensing generated $129 million, an increase of 208% from the prior year.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeoz...s-record-revenue-of-685-million/#4ab97b617102
Granted most of it is Adidas money it's no small part of our revenue stream.
ROI and brand strengthening is not something to be scoffed at with the kind of wages we pay.
Adidas seem to think so and pay us big money to feature their clothing on top stars in top competitions. The two Spanish Giants are on to this important side of revenue and are gaining fast every year copying the big American clubs business model. I'm pretty sure pro athletes feature Nivea face lotion because of the the nice smell and lush texture and the altruism in their blessed hearts.None of that has anything to do with the nonsense idea of shirt sales recouping transfer fees, which has never happened and never will.
Adidas seem to think so and pay us big money to feature their clothing on top stars in top competitions. The two Spanish Giants are on to this important side of revenue and are gaining fast every year copying the big American clubs business model. I'm pretty sure pro athletes feature Nivea face lotion because of the the nice smell and lush texture and the altruism in their blessed hearts.
The clubs make a lot of money from shirt deals. These shirt deals take into account what players are at the club.Does the club make the money from the player name printing? Club would make a bit of money but no where near paying the players transfer fee.
We get a huge bulk payment from the manufacturer based on a few parameters main being how well we do and a big portion of the deal was to qualify for the CL.Does the club make the money from the player name printing? Club would make a bit of money but no where near paying the players transfer fee.
Drop the tough guy act and conjure up numbers.What on earth are you on about?
Go look at numbers of shirts sold year to year and come back when you realise that big signings don't cause much, if any, fluctuation in those numbers.
Drop the tough guy act and conjure up numbers.