Gehrman
Phallic connoisseur, unlike shamans
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2019
- Messages
- 11,884
This is what happens when you call white privileged males "White privileged males".
He's just playing the game of "If you make an unsubstansiated claim(allegedly) and smear about me, I will make one about you.". Still he's not very good at it.
kinda falls down when their claims are substantiated
Yes it does if they are substantiated. It this about his comments about Sainbury's creating a black-only "safe space" and their black pay gap?
yeah, it's because he's boycotting Sainsburies because they support Black History Month
If you honestly think that is any way comparable to segregation where black people were excluded from large parts of society then you need to do some reading and educate yourself.Give it a rest
What's he on about anyway. The only thing wrong with that Sainsbury's thing was this bit...
"Recently we provided our black colleagues with a safe space to gather in response to the Black Lives Matters movement."
I have a bigger problem with him targeting two openly gay men and calling them paedophiles to be honest.
If you honestly think that is any way comparable to segregation where black people were excluded from large parts of society then you need to do some reading and educate yourself.
Of this political party? Yes, it's exactly how'd expect him to behave and he, and many others, feel justified.Well isn't that just the behaviour you'd expect from the leader of a political party?!
Guy is testing the 'all publicity is good publicity' line to it's maximum at the moment.
I thought this guy was a deranged, whiny little bitch but now he's gone and called everybody a paedophile I think he definitely has a point.
Are they deleted now? You don't delete things in the modern world, Laurence.
Someone that decides to boycott a business because they are celebrating black history month puts himself in a situation where people will wonder whether he is racist or stupid. The lad seems to think that his actions or words should have no consequences.
Do we know this to be true or are people trusting the Telegraph to have looked in to it?after he got a bit miffed that his voice wasn't being heard (whilst on a national TV show), he's now gone and been given millions of pounds to start his own political party
he's done a great job of proving that ladies point on question time
Do we know this to be true or are people trusting the Telegraph to have looked in to it?
Okay. That's certainly a specific thing to have made up if he has.Fox himself said that Jeremy Hosking gave him £5m, he could be lying I guess
Wouldnt seem that out of place given what he has done before... donated over £1.5m to vote leave andFox himself said that Jeremy Hosking gave him £5m, he could be lying I guess
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_HoskingIn February 2019 Hosking submitted the paperwork to found a new party called Brexit Express, which would welcome Tory MPs unhappy with the Prime Minister's Brexit plans. At the same time, he launched a public campaign in favour of a no-deal Brexit.
Aw, bless.
Here what one of the people he called a pedophile is doing:
Would be kinda funny if the £5m that Brexit guy donated gets wiped out straight away settling lawsuits from Fox's idiotic tweeting.
Who's this cnut?
Who's this cnut?
Aw, bless.
Am I missing something here or have you got the wrong thread?
Am I missing something here or have you got the wrong thread?