antohan
gets aroused by tagline boobs
How dare you?Don't really need him now though
I passed on Romario in R2 because I thought he would be a better fit. I miss him and nobody seems to give him the credit he is due.
Come to pappa!
How dare you?Don't really need him now though
He's amazing but Romario fits Zico better. Plus I had him not so long ago, in the draft that I won, actually (lost him due to a random injury, iirc, had to play Van Basten later even though this guy was a better choice for the system)How dare you?
I passed on Romario in R2 because I thought he would be a better fit. I miss him and nobody seems to give him the credit he is due.
Come to pappa!
He's amazing but Romario fits Zico better. Plus I had him not so long ago, in the draft that I won, actually (lost him due to a random injury, iirc, had to play Van Basten later even though this guy was a better choice for the system)
Definitely underrated here (and everywhere else) though, fantastic player
Yeah, brilliant. And it's after picking Rio and Neymar in the first two rounds!@Jayvin What a team you have built there. Davids, Keane and Platini running the midfield, Facchetti, Henry and Neymar ganging up on the left flank.
Yeah, brilliant. And it's after picking Rio and Neymar in the first two rounds!
Nothing, but he isn't exactly Baresi or Figueroa.Whats wrong with Rio?
But yeah, jayvin team looks fantastic....up there with the best.
Nothing, but he isn't exactly Baresi or Figueroa.
34 caps. If you are discounting those two Olympics you are in dodgy ground as FIFA organised those as official world championships "until the time comes that a separate tournament is possible".We pick the Black Marvel:
I hope you've got these ready for dealing with DavidG's attack.
34 caps. If you are discounting those two Olympics you are in dodgy ground as FIFA organised those as official world championships "until the time comes that a separate tournament is possible".
That's why Uruguay are allowed 4 Stars on their badge. No team is allowed a star on their badge at the World Cup unless it's a FIFA World Cup one.
Box 15: CAP-LESS - Has less than 30 caps for National Team
- If played for multiple NT's then total of all must be less than 30 caps.
- Includes all caps (friendlies et al)
- Excludes Olympics appearances
Fair enough if the rule changed. It opens up a can of worms though as that was without a shadow of a doubt the full NT playing at the premier international tourno at the time.Not meaning to downplay those 2 Olympic tournos and they were quite clearly important and considered the precursors to the WC.
We are just following the rules (amended) as per the OP though.
I've no problem with exploiting loopholes. I'm arguing it should be closed hereafter with a proper version of the truth because it's just not in the spirit of what that box is all about.Really strange to exclude the Olympic caps given the historical importance of the tournament, but the rules are the rules.
The RSSSF have done the hard work for everyone else really.Fair enough if the rule changed. It opens up a can of worms though as that was without a shadow of a doubt the full NT playing at the premier international tourno at the time.
How hard is it to just stick to a proper record that applies the rules on caps that were in force over time @Edgar Allan Pillow?
http://www.rsssf.com/intlp-countrywise.html
Easy peasy
Back then the Olympic games were held in very high esteem from what I've read. It's probably right next after the WC in terms of importance. It's strange not to be included, but that pick is within the rules.I've no problem with exploiting loopholes. I'm arguing it should be closed hereafter with a proper version of the truth because it's just not in the spirit of what that box is all about.
That entire WC winning side is probably available then.
I don't have a problem with the pick. Just the flawed change in rules.Back then the Olympic games were held in very high esteem from what I've read. It's probably right next after the WC in terms of importance. It's strange not to be included, but that pick is within the rules.
I don't have a problem with the pick. Just the flawed change in rules.
FWIW, I imagine it resulted from the Falcao fiasco. Guess what? RSSF lists all Brazilians >30 caps and he isn't there.
That's the standard to apply, quite clearly.
I've just been dumped a shit load of work/travel for the next 10 days Quite unexpected and very very difficult to devote proper time for this.
I've just been dumped a shit load of work/travel for the next 10 days Quite unexpected and very very difficult to devote proper time for this.
Yup, that list should really be the be-all and end-all given that they recorded all of the appropriate caps, but at this point in time, I don't know if EAP if up for another change in the rulings.I don't have a problem with the pick. Just the flawed change in rules.
FWIW, I imagine it resulted from the Falcao fiasco. Guess what? RSSF lists all Brazilians >30 caps and he isn't there.
That's the standard to apply, quite clearly.
Let's first wait till everyone has learned how to use Ctrl + F, before we go to the next difficulty level.
Any neutrals here who can help out Edgar?
No worries, mate. I can give you a hand until 20/21 Oct then I'm a gonerI've just been dumped a shit load of work/travel for the next 10 days Quite unexpected and very very difficult to devote proper time for this.
We should have one uniformed list as @Gio proposed and stick by it. It's easier for all parties.