It's just that the selective quoting made it look like you were disputing the facts, not the connection.
Kyle Rittenhouse | Now crowdfunding LOLsuits against Whoopi Goldberg, LeBron James, and The Young Turks
- Thread starter Drainy
- Start date
fair enough, I meant the comparison/connections
I wasn't equating property with human lives.
If anything, this vibes are coming from people like you, the hard left-wingers.
And you know it and you are proving it with every post you make.
Yeah, you completely fell for the left-wing propaganda and probably you would have fell for the Nazi propaganda back then aswell.
And yet you posted in this thread.
I did yeah. It's not really surprising considering all the shit burnt down that night.
Who are you, Hubertus Knabe? Stop molesting your interns, then.
Well, you got one over on me.
On another thread I'd probably say that cars can be replaced. A lot of people see property damage covered by Insurance as victimless but life can be hard for some people and it isn't victimless whatever people might say. You still can't just replace a living human being, or the damage caused to family or friends, sometimes the missing is never gotten over.
It's very much a school thing calling people by their surnames- would be odd in the office. I like Donrump though.
He was always going to be found not guilty. I would have been amazed for a whole jury to find him guilty based on the videos and the little bit of law that I read.
I couldn't get past the 20 second mark...
That's even better that I thought
I was at least expecting him to feign a bit of remorse or say that he feels bad about having killed people, but it's just a load of "I could have been hurt instead
". Fecking hell.He'll run for President once. Or Supreme Leader, depending on the timescale. He'll be a Congressman within a decade.
2032, the first election cycle in which he is eligible.
For Congress? He'll be 25 in 2028 won't he? He can't run for President until he's 35, luckily.
Last edited:
You might be right. Can't remember off the top of my head. Thought it was 30 y/o.
Good clip, and good on Cuomo for reignign it in.
How awful has been the media covereage of this thing. CNN is terrible, but MSNBC takes the cake as per usual. Clear example of "white privilege" - like what the actual feck?
There's absolutely no racial angle on this case, everybody is the same color, so I don't understand how you can make a white guy shooting three other white guys about racism unless it's pure whataboutism and hypotheticals which don't contribute to a civilized discourse.
Maybe if you forget everything else that goes on in the country. It's been said a few times, if this was a black guy they'd been shot by the cops before being able to point the gun at anyone so yea a white guy being able to freely roam around with a gun in their presence is pretty clearly white privilege.
That’s a thought experiment that has no bearing on the specifc facts or evidence in this particular case. Let’s assume for a moment that your narrative about white privilege was true. That still wouldn’t change the nature of the Wisconsin law under which the case was prosecuted. The jury’s responsibility was to adjudicate the evidence presented to them, which in the end led them to their final conclusion.
White privilege is just a construct that the media applies selectively to fit a narrative. It's been applied to Rittenhouse but not the other guy who drew a gun and got shot in the arm.
Strictly speaking far as the case is concerned, there's no racial angle here whatsoever, but the media will fan the flames for ratings. It all started when we got these 24/7 "news" channels, that are not news but "infotainment".
Except if you assume the narrative to be true then you won't have a black guy roaming around with a gun in that situation ever even getting to a trial. The fact that this guy wasn't just able to go around with a gun in that situation without anyone batting an eyelid but has been able to defend himself in court and get out on a technicality is 100% white privilege.
You can apply whichever term you prefer to it, but at the end of the day, the specific law and facts of the case are what ultimately led to the jury’s decision.
Yeah and being able to present your case to the jury while being completely unharmed by the cops is the white privilege we are talking about here.
So sad, missing the whole bird is a UFO... post convo..
It made me laugh, which was good after watching that match.
I was just in the see the low down on this case - I know nothing about it.
Clearly a psychopath looking for trouble.
Walking the streets with an automatic weapon should be banded in every country in the world. There are just to many nut jobs out there.
Walking the streets with an automatic weapon should be banded in every country in the world. There are just to many nut jobs out there.
Why's he sitting so close to that other person in the back?
Don't disagree, but kinda funny coming from someone called M16 Red
Moss Side or American gun nut is a tricky game to be fair.Don't disagree, but kinda funny coming from someone called M16 Red
Don't disagree, but kinda funny coming from someone called M16 Red
M16 is my post code, also the post code for old trafford
Did you see the story about the article you mentioned and the controversy surrounding the story? The author, (no longer with the NYTs) was told that her work wouldn’t get published until after the election?
It wasn’t a feckin’ automatic weapon!!!
I have no sympathy for him, but I find it hard to blame him for being happy after winning a trial that could have fecked up his entire future.
I know nothing about guns, thankfully.