sglowrider
Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
Our midfield options other than Casemiro are howling.
Give him and Hannibal a chance.
I think ETH is being very conservative (due to the pressure of needing results) and unwilling to chance it on kids.
Our midfield options other than Casemiro are howling.
Give him and Hannibal a chance.
If he wants to develop us to play that brand of football, he has to set up and instruct the team to play that way, even though it means we won’t get the results we want always. But, he emphasizes on both getting results and developing the team. The compromises made in attempt to achieve both, have shown their damages and the whole team lose ideas and is a mess in play. The transfer failures are the direct consequence of that in my opinion, because his vision and decision making in transfer targets cannot be more directly linked to the desired brand of football we try to play every match and more from imagination which seems unfitting to the reality. Or, maybe his vision is simply infeasible to execute.Thanks for the kind words.
There's only so much problems one can fix in one transfer window. First one must attempt to understand what the problems are. And like I've mentioned countless times, this team is no where near being good enough to play proactive football because it has for years struggled to play out from the back. And because the team can't play out from the back, it can't effectively press from the front. Hence sustaining pressure is a big problem. Heads of recruitment can't change that in one transfer window, especially under the Glazer ownership.
So the team that I presented from the post you quoted, has the potential to develop into the team that I'm talking about. It would need some new additions but with Shaw, Martinez and Mainoo coming back into the team, it gives ten Hag the tools to develop the team further.
He also hasn’t created an optimal environment to fit youngsters to drift in (except Garnacho who has been managed well, even though people keep calling to start him but he is not really ready yet in most league games). We have always in survival mode since last Feb. Throwing in youngsters might not be the right way, but he can give them more opportunities because not playing them doesn’t help mostly, except the Brentford game, which is a true outlier no matter how we look at it.I think ETH is being very conservative (due to the pressure of needing results) and unwilling to chance it on kids.
I don't believe the Glazers are a hindrance as far as player identification is concerned.If he wants to develop us to play that brand of football, he has to set up and instruct the team to play that way, even though it means we won’t get the results we want always. But, he emphasizes on both getting results and developing the team. The compromises made in attempt to achieve both, have shown their damages and the whole team lose ideas and is a mess in play. The transfer failures are the direct consequence of that in my opinion, because his vision and decision making in transfer targets cannot be more directly linked to the desired brand of football we try to play every match and more from imagination which seems unfitting to the reality. Or, maybe his vision is simply infeasible to execute.
With our budget, DF could add more cheaper options rather than so-called three “premium” signings per summer. Those premium signings hardly work out. But maybe, it is also influenced by the Glazers as I remember there is reports that the Glazers believe the established superstars are better buys even though they are around or pass their peak.
He also hasn’t created an optimal environment to fit youngsters to drift in (except Garnacho who has been managed well, even though people keep calling to start him but he is not really ready yet in most league games). We have always in survival mode since last Feb. Throwing in youngsters might not be the right way, but he can give them more opportunities because not playing them doesn’t help mostly, except the Brentford game, which is a true outlier no matter how we look at it.
Bruno and Rashford are not a hindrance for ten Hag as far as playing out from the back is concerned. We can criticise both players for things they do in the final third but the bigger problem is in the defensive third where ten Hag has decided that he's going to go direct. And the tweet below from the press conference earlier does suggest that he knows there's a problem in possession but he won't go into details about what the actual problem is. So going direct or playing in transition does suit certain players in the final third but why we're going direct and playing in transition is the question that needs addressing imo.
After losing de Jong, de Ligt and Schone at Ajax, ten Hag lost three brilliant players in the build up phase and Ajax bought a midfielder in Alvarez who wasn't technically very good in possession. So ten Hag after losing 3 fantastic players in possession build up, still attempted to play through the midfield, and what allowed him to play through the midfield was his GK, CBs and fullbacks. And those players were better on the ball than the Ajax midfielders and hence with Mazraoui and Blind tucking in with support from Pasveer/Onana, Martinez and Timber, Ajax had no problem progressing play. And that back five which includes the GK, carried their midfielders in the build up phase post de Jong and Schone. People were paying too much attention to Martinez and Timber's height as a CB pairing but their ability on the ball under pressure was elite. And because they were elite on the ball and could evade and resist the press along with Blind and Mazraoui, they controlled games.
So imo the biggest problem for ten Hag is the CBs who are currently playing. Because the first port of call for a GK is the CBs and having CBs who have the ability to receive passes under pressure is absolutely imperative. So the injuries to both Shaw and Martinez is a big blow, because both players have the technical qualities in possession to progress the ball. The clip below is a passage of play from ten Hag's first Ajax team against Juventus, and you can clearly see how the ball is being progressed from the back and how the players are not only agile in body but also agile in mind.
And like I've said previously, once he has everyone fit and available again then I do expect to see us play out from the back more often.
This is a 4231 formation with Dalot and Shaw either tucking in vertically (Dalot) and horizontally with Shaw to form a back 3.
---------------------Hojlund------------------------
--Rashford----Mount---Dalot---Antony--
--------------Mainoo-------Amrabat-------------
------Shaw------Martinez------Varane---------
----------------------Onana---------------
Adnan, you are correct in playing out from the back, but this is not our only problem. We had that last year (minus Onana) and even though are football was pragmatic and worked it did not look very pretty since we have other big issues. For example, we cannot keep the ball and we cannot progress our play through simple passes as the videos you posted. Our players are not press resistant and cannot work in tight spaces. Bruno is one of the biggest culprits, and I still do not understand the signing of Casemiro, which you have not commented. Doesn't it feel weird to spend 80m on an aging Casemiro who does not have attributes to play ETH football?
Until now, I just had questions. Unfortunately for all of us, ETH just answered. He confirmed my fears that he is doing something completely different here and I really do not see any point to compare us with Ajax. The club and himself took the wrong route instead of doing a complete overhaul and implement his philosophy by taking hard decisions on current squad.
EtH is basically saying every team will play different because they are have different players. So don't compare United to Ajax.
Not everything has to be over analysed and twisted into a negative.
EtH is basically saying every team will play different because they are have different players. So don't compare United to Ajax.
Not everything has to be over analysed and twisted into a negative.
All of Pep's teams have absolutely dominated the ball though, they have just gone about it in different ways. He had overlapping wingbacks at Barca because he had the best midfield trio of all time to control the center. At Bayern he started inverting fullbacks to help control the midfield more and leave his teams less vulnerable to counter attacking. At City he has brought more overall physicality into the team to match the league and has had to adapt these past two years around providing service to a lethal finisher but overall limited footballer in Haaland. Regardless, every team has played possession oriented dominating football and there are probably less than 10 games in his career at those clubs where his team has not dominated the ball.That response will certainly do him no favours, but I really do think people are ignoring the nuance to it. Obviously we will look to play more direct and with more physicality than his Ajax side did due to both personnel and the nature of English football.
That does not mean that he will completely abandon his ideals of building from the back, playing through the thirds, and creating overloads. Look at Guardiola - this Man City team do not have exactly the same style of play as his Barcelona side and nor did Bayern Munich. They don't even have the same style of play as his City team from 3 years ago. Adjustments will always be made.
All of Pep's teams have absolutely dominated the ball though, they have just gone about it in different ways. He had overlapping wingbacks at Barca because he had the best midfield trio of all time to control the center. At Bayern he started inverting fullbacks to help control the midfield more and leave his teams less vulnerable to counter attacking. At City he has brought more overall physicality into the team to match the league and has had to adapt these past two years around providing service to a lethal finisher but overall limited footballer in Haaland. Regardless, every team has played possession oriented dominating football and there are probably less than 10 games in his career at those clubs where his team has not dominated the ball.
There is adapting your style of play and completely compromising it and we are doing the latter currently. Ten Hag earned his reputation at Ajax for the way he set out those teams, so why would we want him to completely change that when it is what got him the job in the first place.
I fear he’s going to play about 8 of our best 11 available purely for fear of the media reaction if we lose this match rather than using it as a building block type match to try something new.Has to start on Wednesday. Midfield is broken, he’s good enough & this season will be one of mediocrity. Think Saka a few years ago for Arsenal type of integration.
Point partially taken above but it does still seem a fairly odd thing to say given that he has led quite a major squad overhaul already in the shape of Onana, Martinez, Casemiro, Amrabat, Mount, Hojlund, Antony. I mean surely he could have found a few of the current squad to fit into his way of playing if that is what he wanted to do. He sounds very reluctant in 'choosing' to play more direct.
I think fundamentally he has really struggled to bring in the right players and is finding that out.
He could have said that it is never quite 'the same' at each club and that would be fine, but the tone of it really suggests he is unimpressed with the squad's ability to press and play high as a team, while avoiding taking responsibility for that.
And we might soon too. He’s just coming back from a long term injury.One touch, and he left opponent in the dust. Barca would probably have him as starter.
Good managers implement a style of play and the players buy into it.
Not the other way around.
This is everything we thought we weren't getting with ETH.
And we might soon too. He’s just coming back from a long term injury.
hm, interesting.. so Ancelotti changing style o play to accoomodate bellingham almost at no. 10 position is what exactly?
Adnan, you are correct in playing out from the back, but this is not our only problem. We had that last year (minus Onana) and even though are football was pragmatic and worked it did not look very pretty since we have other big issues. For example, we cannot keep the ball and we cannot progress our play through simple passes as the videos you posted. Our players are not press resistant and cannot work in tight spaces. Bruno is one of the biggest culprits, and I still do not understand the signing of Casemiro, which you have not commented. Doesn't it feel weird to spend 80m on an aging Casemiro who does not have attributes to play ETH football?
Until now, I just had questions. Unfortunately for all of us, ETH just answered. He confirmed my fears that he is doing something completely different here and I really do not see any point to compare us with Ajax. The club and himself took the wrong route instead of doing a complete overhaul and implement his philosophy by taking hard decisions on current squad.
He’s just come back from a multi month injury. Better he plays a few full games at a lower level to regain fitness and confidence.Wasting his time in that game tonight when he should be in the team tomorrow.
Sorry for the late response.
I'll start with Casemiro first, and his signing made absolute sense as far as the situation ten Hag and Murtough found themselves in after the debacle of the previous regime where they had put together a team over 5 or 6 years that was lacking technically, physically, athletically and even tactically hence we've been a reactive team for far too long. And it's only now that we've made moves to become a more proactive team by moving De Gea on, moving Ronaldo on and breaking the McFred partnership in midfield which was at best a mid-table midfield two that was very mediocre against the opponent's press. And when you have those sorts of problems all over the pitch and the demand from the owners is top 4, and you also sack the head scouts on the eve of the transfer window, then signing Casemiro makes sense because the team is already lacking a lot and is also devoid of leadership. The work experience clubs like Salzburg and Leipzig don't have this issue because the demand their isn't to win the league but rather to develop talent with the help of a very wealthy owner who has also bought 6 other clubs around the world to tap into markets in different continents which give their employees a massive advantage when identifying talent. So what happened previously under Woodward, Judge, Bout, Lawlor and the managers is what has to be worked around to rebuild a team towards a proactive attacking play style that befits Manchester United. And I fully expect the heads of recruitment and the analytics personnel to now take control of recruitment. And when you don't have these people in position with at least a season of scouting and advance analytics under their belt, then the recruitment will be substandard like we saw in the summer window of 2022.
The results thus far haven't been good enough but as far as the direction of travel is concerned, we've made the right decisions as far as attempting to create a team that can exert dominance over the opponent. Unfortunately we've suffered injuries to key players in the first phase but the decisions that were made over the summer were to improve our build up play by signing Onana, Amrabat and introducing Kobbie Mainoo. And they also decided that they needed to beef up the pressing from the front which is why Mount was signed imo because he's more agile out of possession in comparison to Bruno and his game in possession is more mature and very team oriented. And the striker Hojlund for me again was another good signing who will score goals once we rectify our problems in the build up phase. Because a weak first phase will have a knock on effect on the players occupying positions higher up the pitch. If the opponent's high pressure tactics cause our back-line problems in possession, then you've lost control of the game.
And what ten Hag is saying is absolutely correct and we can never play that brand of football with the players he's currently got at his disposal. But the moves and decisions that were made over the summer, were ones that do show that they're working on creating a team to build play from the back and press high in a compact block. And there was strong indications that they wanted to sign Todibo and Amadou Onana in the summer as well. And we do need those types of players to raise the technical, physical and athletic levels of the team because our biggest issue imo once everyone is fit and available, is that we lack the ability to control the game out of possession in large spaces. I think the funds should be made available in the January transfer window to beef up the team (posted below) out of possession. The team has capability in possesion but having a player like Amadou Onana or even Lucas Gourna-Douath would really help us control defensive transitions.
Arsenal under Arteta and Edu finished 8th, 8th and 5th. Arsenal fans were livid and couldn't believe how both men were still in a job. But as long as the project makes sense, then you have to keep faith with the rebuild in a league which is being dominated by a team bank rolled by a nation state.
The team below is where it's at for us going forward and the team potentially provides a good foundation going into future transfer windows. Zlatan recently said in a interview with Piers Morgan that there's certain teams who start a project and when the results go wild they then abandon the project. I think it's important not to abandon the project and add to the strong elements in the team below by taking away the weaker elements via the transfer window.
---------------------Hojlund-------------------
--Rashford---Mount---Bruno---Dalot--
-----------Mainoo-------Amrabat-------------
------Shaw----Martinez----Varane---------
----------------------Onana---------------
Sounds about right, I think? He looks like 5ft9-ish. He's very broad shouldered but he still looks pretty average height.wiki says he’s 175cm. From video, it doesn’t seem right, anyone knows?
Think it was a poor pass to him.I'll probably get torn to shreds if I say he was at fault for Salfords seconds goal, so I won't
It wouldn't surprise me if we started all three of Garnacho, Mainoo and Hannibal against Newcastle and win the game.
Yeah was a weak pass for sure. Still think he could have challenged for it though but anyway that was a minor blip in an all round good performance.Think it was a poor pass to him.