hundred_trillion
New Member
Strootman is not better than Pogba He's a better player than Nainggolan but it's got to work in our advantage that Roma have as good as replaced him already.
Strootman not better than Pogba/ What the actual feck? In which area except for flair and long range shooting is Pogba better than Strootman? That kid is so overrated.
Should be able to get him at a cut price deal then!
Still nobody who has elaborated why Pogba is better..Jeez!
Still nobody who has elaborated why Pogba is better..
Simply because he isn't, and they can't seem to come to terms with Strootman actually being better than the prodigal son Pogba.Still nobody who has elaborated why Pogba is better..
Still nobody who has elaborated why Pogba is better..
How about you ask why top managers are naming Pogba as the best or one of the best central midfielders in the world
While Strootman isnt getting a mention?
Because Strootman is injured? Our manager LVG, switched to 352 simply because Strootman was injured, is there more to say? Strootman is such a complete midfielder, Pogba shows his class at times and is more attacking than Strootman. Both box to box'es, but in that role Strootman is much more complete and does his task a lot better, people prefer to see those worldies or those funny tricks Pogba does over Strootman controlling the game, being important with interceptions, bringing the ball forward, being dynamic and with excellent work rate.How about you ask why top managers are naming Pogba as the best or one of the best central midfielders in the world
While Strootman isnt getting a mention?
Strootman last season wasn't better than Ander is this season let alone Pogba
And Herrera this season is better than Herrera last season.
True
Because Strootman is injured? Our manager LVG, switched to 352 simply because Strootman was injured, is there more to say? Strootman is such a complete midfielder, Pogba shows his class at times and is more attacking than Strootman. Both box to box'es, but in that role Strootman is much more complete and does his task a lot better, people prefer to see those worldies or those funny tricks Pogba does over Strootman controlling the game, being important with interceptions, bringing the ball forward, being dynamic and with excellent work rate.
Still nobody who has elaborated why Pogba is better..
Is this seriously the way you argue? If Pogba was level Zidane okay, you're being a bit ridiculous atm.Because Strootman isn't better than him and no one could be bothered arguing about that.
Why? Do you just make statements like that, with no reasoning?Pogba is better and younger.
Now back to the subject.
Why? Do you just make statements like that, with no reasoning?
Would they, more effective? What do you mean by that, in terms of goals/assists , Strootman was better, Pogba stronger than Strootman? What, have you ever seen Strootman play? Strootman is a better distributor of the ball, better workrate, he is better defensively, more concistent and better tactically, Pogba shows his class in glimpses with beautiful goals/passes/tricks, but imo he is a clear level below Strootman (that could have changed now as Strootman hasnt hit a ball in half a year).Even a Roma fan would admit that Pogba is better then Strootman. He's younger, more effective, stronger and more technically gifted. The difference in talent is pretty distinct. Its like comparing Scholes and Gerrard or Rio and Terry. Oh wait EPL lovers just love arguing the obvious isn't it?
Your Scholes/Gerrard comparison doesnt really go, Pogba and Strootman are much more similar kind of players than Scholes/Gerrard was.Would they, more effective? What do you mean by that, in terms of goals/assists , Strootman was better, Pogba stronger than Strootman? What, have you ever seen Strootman play? Strootman is a better distributor of the ball, better workrate, he is better defensively, more concistent and better tactically, Pogba shows his class in glimpses with beautiful goals/passes/tricks, but imo he is a clear level below Strootman (that could have changed now as Strootman hasnt hit a ball in half a year).
Your Scholes/Gerrard comparison doesnt really go, Pogba and Strootman are much more similar kind of players than Scholes/Gerrard was.
We are not talking about talent now, but who is the better player.But the difference in terms of talent is equally clear. Actually its more different to argue the difference between Scholes and Gerrard rather then that between Pogba and Strootman.
We are not talking about talent now, but who is the better player.
Strootman until his injury was better than all the player you mentioned, they also all have been inconsistent, which can explain the different opinions. Pogba is younger than the others and he probably have a better potential.
Now Strootman intelligence makes him better, Herrera drive makes him excellent, Pogba creativity makes him exciting and since Thiago has all the aforementioned qualities he is the best.
Who was the better player between Keane and Butt? Same.
Pogba is clearly the better player. He's faster, stronger and more technically gifted. I understand LVG for opting for Strootman. The latter is LVG's man, he knows his tactics inside out and would sweat blood for LVG's cause. However let us be clear. Strootman is nowhere near to Vidal or Pogba.
You're so very wrong. Strootman was better than Pogba last season although it's obvious Pogba has more "talent". However, "talent" doesn't equal being better. Teams like Madrid or PSG want Pogba because he has the potential to be the best midfielder in the world and he is quite young too, not because he is already the best midfielder in the world.Who was/is the better player between Keane and Butt? Iniesta and Herrera? Ronaldo and Beckham? Same
Pogba is clearly the better player. He's faster, stronger and more technically gifted. I understand LVG for opting for Strootman. The latter is LVG's man, he's gettable and would sweat blood for LVG's cause. However let us be clear. Strootman is nowhere near to Vidal or Pogba.
You're so very wrong. Strootman was better than Pogba last season although it's obvious Pogba has more "talent". However, "talent" doesn't equal being better. Teams like Madrid or PSG want Pogba because he has the potential to be the best midfielder in the world and he is quite young too, not because he is already the best midfielder in the world.
Keane, more talented same consistency.
The fact that Pogba is in the Ballon d'or list, is not a good argument when Modric, Koke(from the little i've seen) or even Thiago (despite the injuries) have been better and aren't on that list, it's a political list.
Pogba is a great prospect but is not consistent (probably due to his age), Strootman has been better or has good during a longer period (also probably due to his age) Strootman has also more influence on his team than Pogba.
He wasnt better than Ander has started this season, but its also only been 5 games for Ander and was a lot of games over the season for Strootman
You're so very wrong. Strootman was better than Pogba last season although it's obvious Pogba has more "talent". However, "talent" doesn't equal being better. Teams like Madrid or PSG want Pogba because he has the potential to be the best midfielder in the world and he is quite young too, not because he is already the best midfielder in the world.
I was comparing only last season performances, not Ander current season and Strootman last season.
At the moment if i'm not mistaken amongst the under 24 midfielders only Kroos has been clearly better than Herrera.
Well for starters, Pjanic is Roma's best player and most important midfielder, while they also have De Rossi who is key to them and probably was better last season. Then Juventus have Vidal who is clearly better, and pogba who probably is at this point too. That's only looking at midfielders for those top 2 teams. Strootman is class, but in no way is he the best midfielder at his club let alone the best player in the league.
And no, its not just Bosnian bias with regards to Pjanic, most people who watch Roma consistently would tell you the same.