Do you have any contribution to make other than being a pathetic WUM ? Thought not - that's your level.This 26 years must really be hurting you mate, cleary bitter
Do you have any contribution to make other than being a pathetic WUM ? Thought not - that's your level.This 26 years must really be hurting you mate, cleary bitter
I made my contribution before you came into the discussion but some other scouser wasnt happy with what I said abd got shirty so I started taking the piss and he stopped but youve come in now. That alright with you? Go back to my original comment and dont just read half the thread.Do you have any contribution to make other than being a pathetic WUM ? Thought not - that's your level.
@Rafateria Page 83 then 85They were lucky today. If that penalty hadnt come they wouldnt have won. Theyve started the season well but they wont be contenders come May.
So then can we apply the same logic to United's results, or Arsenal's, or even City's?Well, it wasn't, I've just found it amusing that so many, despite not caring and thinking it's a load of rubbish, jumped on it.
At the end of the day, I lumped your fixtures into two, maybe three categories and judged them accordingly. You've either played a shite team, a good team at a good time, or Leicester who may well fall into the former.
Do any of our resident scousers disagree with the assertion that Hull, Burnley and Swansea are shite, and should be good for 6 points this season?
Do any of our resident scousers disagree with the assertion that, despite their heroics last season, we have seen numerous teams demonstrate already that Leicester are there to be beaten, and beaten quite comfortably?
Do any of our resident scousers disagree with the assertion that playing Arsenal away on the opening day, with no senior central defenders fit, was a tad fortunate?
Do any of our resident scousers disagree with the assertion that playing Chelsea away, early in the season, under a new manager, whilst they're still finding their feet, and coming off the back of a poor draw against a shite Swansea, was a tad fortunate?
Do any of our resident scousers disagree with the assertion that playing Spurs away, early in the season, before their run of good form that saw them dismantle City had got going, was a tad fortunate?
You can only beat what's in front of you, and by and large you've done that thus far, but my point still remains that you could have had a tougher time against some of the teams you've played.
@Rafateria
Ok yous have had a good start to the season, that doesnt make you contenders to win it with 31 games to go. You have a thin squad, a good manager but not a single winner in your team. None of your players have ever won anything. Not exactly proof that yous have thr capability to win the league and you know that. Liverpool fans are coming on here and questioning our players whove won all sorts amongst them. But we're called mad for saying that Liverpool wont be contenders. Makes no sense at all.
@Rafateria
Ok yous have had a good start to the season, that doesnt make you contenders to win it with 31 games to go. You have a thin squad, a good manager but not a single winner in your team. None of your players have ever won anything. Not exactly proof that yous have thr capability to win the league and you know that. Liverpool fans are coming on here and questioning our players whove won all sorts amongst them. But we're called mad for saying that Liverpool wont be contenders. Makes no sense at all.
So then can we apply the same logic to United's results, or Arsenal's, or even City's?
United have beaten Hull and Bournemouth which by using your logic counts as rubbish opposition. You've also beaten Southampton who have a new manager (the same as Chelsea), and the other victory was against Leicester who you've already written off as an easy game or playing a good side at a good time.
If we apply your logic then you can point to anyone's results so far and find excuses for them.
Well, yeah. I've not claimed otherwise. United haven't won a game you wouldn't expect them to win, and have had two extremely disappointing results in the Stoke and Watford games. The only real test should have been the City game, and even then I think we should have been coming away with at least a point, if not all three.
Arsenal will be disappointed to have dropped points against yourselves and Leicester, but the rest has been largely run of the mill, including Chelsea, who, as we've discussed, haven't got going properly.
City will be chuffed to have come away from Old Trafford with the points, but may have been lucky to play us during the Rooney saga, with a proper first xi not identified, and as our first proper test. They will be disappointed by the Spurs result, but may count themselves as a bit unlucky to have caught Spurs in the midst of a run of good form. Likewise, Spurs may have been a bit lucky that City came to them off the back of a disappointing draw at Celtic.
Which Liverpool youth/reserve players will Klopp have his eye on?
There's a lot of buzz around here about Ben Woodburn, how's he doing? Harry Wilson is a little older but I'm holding out hope on him too for the national team.
Well if you're judging everyone like that then fair enough.Well, yeah. I've not claimed otherwise. United haven't won a game you wouldn't expect them to win, and have had two extremely disappointing results in the Stoke and Watford games. The only real test should have been the City game, and even then I think we should have been coming away with at least a point, if not all three.
Arsenal will be disappointed to have dropped points against yourselves and Leicester, but the rest has been largely run of the mill, including Chelsea, who, as we've discussed, haven't got going properly.
City will be chuffed to have come away from Old Trafford with the points, but may have been lucky to play us during the Rooney saga, with a proper first xi not identified, and as our first proper test. They will be disappointed by the Spurs result, but may count themselves as a bit unlucky to have caught Spurs in the midst of a run of good form. Likewise, Spurs may have been a bit lucky that City came to them off the back of a disappointing draw at Celtic.
You shouldn't even bother replying to him. We could beat Barcelona 0-3 at Camp Nou this weekend and he'd say it means feck all because they lost to Celta de Vigo last week.Well if you're judging everyone like that then fair enough.
I think it's a bit harsh on the winning side though.
Chelsea were doing well when we played them and had 10 points from 4 games, including Watford away who beat you lot. Their home record is pretty impressive too so it's a bit daft to say they hadn't got going.
City were deserved winners against United, if I recall they could have been out of sight by half time.
There are no easy games in the league, results prove that. The problem is you won't give us credit but prefer to look elsewhere for explanations.
There will always be a good time to play teams depending on the fixtures but by any reasonable argument 7 points away at the 3 big London teams is a good haul - irrespestive of when the games were played and who supposedly hadn't got going.
Well if you're judging everyone like that then fair enough.
I think it's a bit harsh on the winning side though.
You shouldn't even bother replying to him. We could beat Barcelona 0-3 at Camp Nou this weekend and he'd say it means feck all because they lost to Celta de Vigo last week.
Well, it wasn't, I've just found it amusing that so many, despite not caring and thinking it's a load of rubbish, jumped on it.
At the end of the day, I lumped your fixtures into two, maybe three categories and judged them accordingly. You've either played a shite team, a good team at a good time, or Leicester who may well fall into the former.
Do any of our resident scousers disagree with the assertion that Hull, Burnley and Swansea are shite, and should be good for 6 points this season?
Do any of our resident scousers disagree with the assertion that, despite their heroics last season, we have seen numerous teams demonstrate already that Leicester are there to be beaten, and beaten quite comfortably?
Do any of our resident scousers disagree with the assertion that playing Arsenal away on the opening day, with no senior central defenders fit, was a tad fortunate?
Do any of our resident scousers disagree with the assertion that playing Chelsea away, early in the season, under a new manager, whilst they're still finding their feet, and coming off the back of a poor draw against a shite Swansea, was a tad fortunate?
Do any of our resident scousers disagree with the assertion that playing Spurs away, early in the season, before their run of good form that saw them dismantle City had got going, was a tad fortunate?
You can only beat what's in front of you, and by and large you've done that thus far, but my point still remains that you could have had a tougher time against some of the teams you've played.
Chelsea still haven't got going so I have no idea what you're on about there. They drew with a shit Swansea team the week before playing you, lost to you, and got turned over by Arsenal the other week ffs. Likewise, United haven't got going other, as evidenced by the Watford and Stoke results.
You make it sound as though some higher intelligence or mystical power is at hand here.
Maybe you are right. I've changed my mind.
It's our season la .
I do get your points but what do you want me to do about it ?
How can you forget the great Leicester?!Forest
Villa
Everton
Arsenal
United
There is just a few teams with no winners that became winners.
Chelsea were hilariously overrated though. Scoring last minute goals with a player who shouldn't have been on the pitch.Chelsea were unbeaten in the league when we played them and generally regarded as a very difficult proposition (as their record proves) at Stamford Bridge.
I don't get the hadn't got going yet at all - even if true so what?
Any team who wins there it's a great result - how hard is that to grasp?
Almost like what people are doing re: 'Pool now?Chelsea were hilariously overrated though. Scoring last minute goals with a player who shouldn't have been on the pitch.
It's almost as if Chelsea have now been judged by their season as a whole so far and their actual performances and not what people thought they could be a few games in. Shocker!
People were just giving Conte and Chelsea the title of league contenders, it was baffling.
Just avoid making out that your start has been anything other than sightly better than expected at best and you'll be grand
How can you forget the great Leicester?!
Okayyy then...Well, it wasn't,
@Rafateria
Ok yous have had a good start to the season, that doesnt make you contenders to win it with 31 games to go. You have a thin squad, a good manager but not a single winner in your team. None of your players have ever won anything. Not exactly proof that yous have thr capability to win the league and you know that. Liverpool fans are coming on here and questioning our players whove won all sorts amongst them. But we're called mad for saying that Liverpool wont be contenders. Makes no sense at all.
Chelsea were hilariously overrated though. Scoring last minute goals with a player who shouldn't have been on the pitch.
It's almost as if Chelsea have now been judged by their season as a whole so far and their actual performances and not what people thought they could be a few games in. Shocker!
People were just giving Conte and Chelsea the title of league contenders, it was baffling.
There is a balance though, and most on here would have had Chelsea down for top 4 as a minimum.
There are always good and bad times to play certain teams - but that should not deflect the fact that 3 points there for anyone is a terrific result. The comments that they hadn't got going yet are a bit daft to be honest and just a reason not to give us any credit.
Why bother yourself with replying? All he is doing is repeating himself over and over. At the start of the season City were going to win it Man Utd second Chelsea third Arsenal/Spurs fourth and we were going to roll in around 10th I think that's what most had down as. I am just enjoying the now, who knows where any of us will end up come the end of the season. Just enjoy the moment while we are playing some great football and having success with it and others aren't and the others just can't handle it (well some of them)
Jeez. Talk about delusional. That tells you all you need to know about Alex and his game assessment intelligence.The only real test should have been the City game, and even then I think we should have been coming away with at least a point, if not all three.
Jeez. Talk about delusional. That tells you all you need to know about Alex and his game assessment intelligence.
I'm done with reading any more posts from him (well to be honest they are so long-winded I skip over the bulk) and Green Pea or whatever he's called. Pure Wummery or simply a lack of intelligent debate. Call it what you will.
meanwhile, in the real world...
This 26 years must really be hurting you mate, cleary bitter