Jurgen Klopp Sack Watch
- Thread starter Samid
- Start date
If Utd with a worse 11 and a past it Jose finish above Klopp after this spending spree then he should be sacked.Are you suggesting, that José is the underdog here?
Posters are trying to have their cake and eat it over this, Either Jose is a miracle worker by holding off the all powerful Klopp with a poorer squad or he assembled a squad thats better than Liverpools which is proof that he is taking us in the right direction.
If anything there should be even more pressure on Klopp. He should be fighting for the title now. If not, it will be a massive failure.
It's such a pity that you don't get to set our standards, isn't it? I doubt any Liverpool fan would care whether United fans consider their season a failure or not.
A year an a half later in an increasingly inflated market...
But you're busy coming on here questing Utd all season, Liverpool fans on a Utd forum..
You can hide in a pressure less bubble all you want but Klopp isn't being backed without expectations or else why be backed at all?
If Jose finishes above you then you deserve to be called out over it, either his team building was a failure or his management was.
Klopp will have spent a lot more on transfers than Jose has if you buy Fekir and Allison with the net spend being something like 80m (?) and going by this thread, 80m is nothing in the market these days.
There's no excuses anymore.
You're already counting signings that haven't even taken place while disregarding any United interest in players or should I include Alex Sandro for £80m in your transfers as well? Keita, Fabinho and possibly Alisson would be bought for the amount we sold Coutinho for, so I don't really see the problem at all.
A season should be assessed as a whole, not based on whether we will finish above or below United. In theory, we should be challenging for the title yes, but if City is anywhere as close to how they were last year domestically, that won't happen. I'll happily finish 3th after Mourinho if it means we win a cup though, as 2nd or 3th doesn't make a difference to me if you're not challenging for the title anyway.
People saying that Klopp should be sacked if we don't win something this season are downright crazy. He's made sure our squad has undergone a total transformation in less than 3 years. Ask any football fan in Milan how difficult that is and we should be lauding Klopp for what he's done at our club so far instead of calling for his sacking if we don't win a trophy.
I think you are misinterpreting his comments. I'll post them again for the sake of clarity:
King Klopp (2016) "Other clubs can go out and spend more money and collect top players. I want to do it differently. I would even do it differently if I could spend that money"
He says, quite clearly, he would limit the clubs transfer expenditure regardless of the size of his war chest. His intention here is to go with the "it's not the size that counts, but how you use it" philosophy. But that proved not to be the case after he went on a spending spree - breaking transfer records in the process - making him a hypocrite and/or a liar.
He didn't say that directly, the above is simply my interpretation of the meaning behind his statement.
@RobinLFC
I did say if you sign those two players which looks like you will be to be fair.
Utd aren't linked with anybody, we get stories every so often from random podcasts but there's every chance our transfer business is done.
There would be sweet irony if Jose is successful this year by holding back available funds to back his management of the squad.
I did say if you sign those two players which looks like you will be to be fair.
Utd aren't linked with anybody, we get stories every so often from random podcasts but there's every chance our transfer business is done.
There would be sweet irony if Jose is successful this year by holding back available funds to back his management of the squad.
Fair play to Mourinho if he wins the league with your current squad, no doubt about that. However if he doesn't he should also deserve criticism for not addressing the (obvious) weaknesses present.
Or maybe other clubs were proactive and made signings before inflation and that's what Jose said after the signing.
Anyways Liverpool fans hiding behind "inflated market" is hilarious, considering other defenders were also signed in that season and VVD cost 50% more than record transfers. Ederson was signed for 34 million last season and Alisson will cost 100% more than that.
I'm not sure why the inflated market is being used as a justification when Klopp has said that even if he could spend money, he would do it differently.
Yet, he's not.
The market was inflated when he made those comments, was it not?
There's more pressure with more money spent, that's a given. And surely, we should be closer to the Manchesters, but spending spree? Has Klopp spent more than you and City?
Anyways.. don't forget, that City ran with it, and you ended comfortably 2nd, so it would be massive progress to overtake you, let alone City. We ended 4th, so i would say 3rd is good progress.
Do you think, Liverpools squad is better than yours? Or what do you mean?
If so, Surely Klopp should be applauded for assembling a squad better than Uniteds, losing on of the key players on the way.
Oh Gawd, I'd forgotten** about @Cassady -
And full of belief & new season optimism by the looks of it, too -.
**not really,
Don't you forget about me.... will you recognise me..
I don't get posts like these. We've been much better than we have been since Ferguson retired including 2 trophies and our best league and points finishes. Jose has indisputably moved us forward.
No because those rumours are dead or have been on life support. There's lots of momentum behind Allison and reports are coming out that he's been signed for double the world record of a keeper.
This.
It's factually wrong that Jose hasn't taken us forward. Quite bizzare that anyone thinks he's not the man to take us forward.
Buffon went for €52m. Alisson reportedly will join us for €75 all add-ons included, so the fee will probably below €70m. That's not even close to double.
There goes the moral victory card out the window.
It is a huge amount over the record signing who happens to be a generational talent. I read it was over double but they referred to Premier League signing for a keeper.
And my point about Sandro stands. No point in talking about a made up fee for him until we are at least reasonably close to signing him, which currently we are not (nowhere close).
In that sense he has but a lot of your fan base are not that optimistic.
Klopp never had a moral card. He's a terrible sport and blames the pitch, referees, tactical noncomformity etc. when losing. He has also proven himself to be hypocritical. That doesn't make him a bad manager or person and it doesn't mean Liverpool supporters shouldn't love him to bits. But it means that United supporters can give him a hard time on a United forum!
Mate I also spend time in Manchester and stay there with family often. I walk to the grounds and mingle with the local support at pubs after matches.
So when you talk about "every proper manc" and then make an absurd generalisation like that about the manager, I just roll my eyes. His name is still sung from the stands and he's generally looked upon more favourably locally than on this forum where he gets a very hard time.
Not to mention we're talking about the world record fee for a defender (by some distance) and potentially the world record fee for a keeper (by some distance).
Not sure what the point of the mental gymnastics is. He made a foolish statement and has been hypocritical (like a lot of people are). Rather than pretend he meant that he wouldn't drop £200 million on one player, just accept the comments he made and be happy that he seems to be addressing the weaknesses in the team.
Looking at them from an objective viewpoint, I think it is fair to say that United and Liverpool are comparatively even in terms of their very best first 11, but United have the better of the two squads overall. This is, of course, very much subject to change given the relatively untouched war chest Jose has available to him - which I am absolutely positive he will make use of before the current transfer window closes.
I would be slightly concerned should Jose choose not make further additions to the squad, but not to the point of believing this Liverpool side capable of overtaking us in the league. In the modern game, squad-size counts for everything and United are ahead in this department. Just my opinion.
Exactly. Some of the posts are laughable and tbh pathetic too. So many CBs were signed last season but Klopp broke record for a defender by spending 50% more on record transfer. Last season Ederson was signed for 34 million, they broke the record by spending 100% more on previous record.
Not really interested in whether Klopp makes hypocritical comments or not, as every manager does.
What's more interesting is he's quite clearly improving the squad's weaknesses significantly. And Liverpool-supporters are having a hell of a lot of fun along the way to whatever results he'll achieve. (I'm quite sure he'll bring trophies at some point)
At the moment, I'd be very happy with him if it were my club.
What's more interesting is he's quite clearly improving the squad's weaknesses significantly. And Liverpool-supporters are having a hell of a lot of fun along the way to whatever results he'll achieve. (I'm quite sure he'll bring trophies at some point)
At the moment, I'd be very happy with him if it were my club.
I'd agree with that. We can roughly match your best 11, but not having enough quality in the squad hampered us last season when the inevitable injuries came, and we had to rely on the likes of Solanke, Ings, Klavan, etc.
Yup, that's all that matters at the end of the day.
Also, as if United can complain about another manager being a twat.
Precisely. They have the world's most expensive defender & likely to have the most expensive goalkeeper - these are huge purchases.
Liverpool fans in particular have held onto the 'net spend' trophy for many years, by claiming they're different to United, Chelsea & City and using their lack of spending power as reasons for their lack of trophies - unfortunately for them they're finding out that in order to compete at the highest level, they need to open up that chequebook.
Alisson and Van Dijk combined don't even cost as much as what we sold Coutinho for, if you really want to do the "net spend" route.
I won't often defend him, but Liverpool got £145m for Coutinho (I think?).
Imagine the outcry there would be if he didn't spend all of that money. If he does get Alisson you'd have to say on paper at least that he's spent it pretty well.
Stupid comment to make certainly, but doesn't really detract from what he's done/is doing.
Imagine the outcry there would be if he didn't spend all of that money. If he does get Alisson you'd have to say on paper at least that he's spent it pretty well.
Stupid comment to make certainly, but doesn't really detract from what he's done/is doing.
I thought the Coutinho deal was ~£110m upfront with the rest being performance related bonuses? 75 (VVD) + 66 (Alisson) = more than 110m last time I checked.
Plus you've spent over £40m and £50m (& rising) each for Fabinho & Keita respectively, IIRC? Then Mo Salah was somewhere between £35-40m which is upwards of £120m for those 3 alone.
That's still a hell a lot of money spent, if that was Mourinho, the scrutiny would be intense.
£66m for Alisson is all add-ons included. Keita ended up £53m and will not rise anymore. Salah was £34m which is an absolute steal no matter how you look at it, same for Mane which was a similar amount.
I don't see the problem. Actually, we still have more than enough money left to buy other players.
Yeah because those things are entirely the same. Crap shirts and hundreds of millions of failure are in the same universe.
Ffs
Liverpool fans talking big shit because they might sign a goalkeeper.
Long may their delusion continue
Keita is 62 million if they finish in Europa league places and they did.
https://sportbild.bild.de/bundeslig...ool-transfer-wechsel-geld-54174386.sport.html
Salah is 37 or 39 Million pounds, Roma officially announced it.
Oh the doubling down card.
Read what he said “if football goes down that road” aka massive inflation the he “still would not do it even if he could”
Stop winding them up, you know they like to see us scrounging and penny pinching so this all a bit new for the United fans. I can understand why the United fans are bringing up the Pogba comments, Klopp should have known better.You're wrong, it was £59m for CL, £53m for EL and £48m if no Europe.
BBC reported Salah at £34m, but I know Roma has said it was more than that. I just preferred to chose a source which suited my arguments, as did you.
I don't care how much we paid. We have a stronger starting XI than United at the moment, and for a large part that's down to Klopp.
You'll be looking at about £460m of Klopp signings if Fekir joins too, and a £600m squad. I'll bet that surprises a few.