I assumed we were talking about youth development, Pogba had his at United from 16-19. He was the second best talent in his group at the time. When he returned for a world record fee, he was 23, and we’re not talking about which clubs have the best reputation for developing 23 olds into 27 olds, are we? Is that what Dortmund does, after Lewa? Do they have any 27 year olds better than Pogba atm? Pogba is an example of United not wanting to be held ransom by players, something United can afford, but Dortmund would struggle if they had let players like Götze, Dembele and Pulisic leave on a free rather than giving them playing time, and they would struggle if they denied such players to leave to the extent United have with Pogba, don’t you think? It’s part of the reason why players like Sancho and Haaland went there ahead of City and United at such a young age. That is a business strategy as much as being it is being good at developing players.
Rashford Is not your field of expertise, it seems to me. I’ve followed him from age
16, and he has developed all the time, with periods of spurts and of stagnation like all kids, yes, and more under Solskjær than anyone else, but there has generally been a steady growth.
oh, and Martial, he has certainly improved as a player, but his passivity and lack of instinct for movement has been a weakness for all to see since before he came, and who knows if it is even possible to coach that entirely away. Fingers crossed.
I don’t know Dortmund well enough, and take your word for their actual superiority in youth development the last five-ten years. We’ve already agreed that their reputation is a lot better.
I know United pretty well. Did you know that United the last ten years have brought more players into top league play than any other PL club? This is under Moyes, Van Gaal and Mourinho as well. I would bet many people outside of England doesn’t
know that. So all was not as bleak as our reputation implied, even then. We restructured our youth setup the last five years, though, and have seen the best bunch of youth players grow up in a while.
It seems to me a tendency that United have brought through 9 year olds, brought in 15 year olds, and bought 25 year olds as a tendency the latter years. Van Gaal being the exception bringing in Martial, Shaw and Depay. Solskjær is more like that with Wan Bissaka and James, but he is also bringing in Greenwood, Williams, Garner, Chong, Laird, Gomes and more from the U18 setup. That is different from buying the worlds best 18 year olds for good money and a promise of playing time. You can’t really do everything at once though.
Very good points but I think I have to make a little bit clearer why I mentioned Pogba's development after his return.
Players in different stages of their career need different circumstances at the club. As a young player playing for academy teams, United has probably always been a very, very good destination because chances are that even under Mourinho they will trust you and grant you minutes in the first team eventually - more so than other clubs of a similar calibre. However, if you're in a situation like Sancho, Haaland or Havertz, playing time at a club is also a concern but I would say it is not the primary one since you just take that for granted at this stage. Once you've established yourself as one of footballs brightest prospects, your next goal is to prove that you can perform at a very high level at an elite club. And that's not only up to you. As an attacking player, I'd argue that it is a lot easier to shine at City than it was at United under Mourinho. And IMO, that's the most important reason why talents develop that well at Dortmund. Ever since Klopp, they employed coaches that had a clear philosophy in which every player knew what to do. They always have a shared approach of how to build up and execute their attacks and those patterns make it a lot easier for young players to shine and become better - after all, they find themselves in a lot more situations and gain more experience and routine through that.
And that's why I, among other United players, mentioned Pogba's development after his return as a reason why your reputation took a hit. Because all those things that make life easier for young attacking players at Dortmund, he didn't really encounter in his first years at United. So for Sancho "Pogba's story" may be more interesting than those of academy players getting minutes at the first team - because he can assume that the club signs him for >100m his starting spot is pretty much guaranteed so that his situation is more comparable to him than that of a youth player. As I said, I believe things are beginning to change and so is United's reputation again, but there are still some question marks that only time and more proof of the contrary will eliminate.
Regarding Rashford: I admit I'm not an expert on the player. You can't follow the development of every young player that closely so you guys obviously have way more insights than I do. I base my judgement on the fact that when he came through, he was highly decorated (and rightly so because he's got all the ability) and at times even compared to Mbappe and based on that standard, I think he was expected to develop much better than he eventually did. And I also think he would've made the step he is currently doing much earlier if it hadn't been for Mourinho's destructive ideas regarding football. Same goes for Martial and obviously, that is something a youngster considers before a move. But again: It takes some time to change your reputation. That doesn't mean that I think it still is like that. You could actually be doing a better job than Dortmund in the past 6 months without anyone noticing who's not paying very close attention.
Bellingham by the way is a very unique case because he's already one of the world's most demanded youngsters but also still incredibly young.
See, in the situation of a player like Sancho, Havertz or Haaland willing to make the next step after already having established yourself, your aim is not to get into the squad but to look as good as possible in an already strong team. And for that it is not that important if the club is good at integrating youth players but rather if it provides a functioning team which makes it easier for you to shine. United exemplarily is much better than City at integrating youth products but as of now, an attacker has it much easier to shine (and develop) at City's offense (given he makes it into the team) where one gear fits perfectly into the other. That's a huge part of the reason why Dortmund is so successful at developing young players. They always have a coach with a clear philosophy where every player knows what he has to do. And they play an attacking brandt of football which makes it easy to shine. On top of that, they plan with you since it is their business model, as you already mentioned.
As an academy player choosing the club at which he starts his professional career, however, you're probably looking for something different. Of course it is always nice to find yourself in a working tactical structure but your primary concern is to get your first minutes etc. So if I were Sancho, I'd definitely take a profound look at Pogba's development after his return which IMO was greatly hindered by different coaches, occasionally poor team mates and so forth. I believe Pogba, although I'm not a fan of his, would have had it much easier under a more attack minding coach than Mourinho. United just hasn't been a team in which things just work out, with player synergies, attacking patterns etc. And theoretically
That's what I mean with reputation.