You guys can put green smilies and laugh all you want but Mata was voted Chelsea's best player for his performances in the league (which they finished 6), not the champions league where it was really different players impacting games and a strong team unit that led them to win. Drogba in the final. Ramires was phenomenal in the Barcelona games. Lampard, Drogba, and Terry in the Napoli tie.
Here are some quotes on just the final game (which you guys like to use as why he was instrumental because he took a corner kick that drogba scored on).
"Showed glimpses of his technical excellence but the Spaniard was a completely peripheral figure in this encounter. On the rare occasion Chelsea attacked in numbers, the former Valencia man looked dangerous, but this occurred on only a couple of times. Missed his penalty, summing up his evening." Three star rating, one of the lowest on the team. Goal.com
"Took Chelsea's first corner of game, from which Drogba levelled matters. Missed his penalty, the Blues' first, but it worked out in the end." Along with receiving the
lowest rating of every single player on Chelsea's team.
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2012/may/19/bayern-munich-chelsea-ratings
"Passed the ball well in the first half but drifted out of the match before delivering the corner Drogba thumped home. Feared he had blown it for the Blues in the shoot-out but ended his first season in SW6 a double cup winner and European champion." Second lowest rated Chelsea player.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/champions-league-final-chelsea-and-bayern-841959
The semi finals now:
"Shares an international dressing-room with much of the Barcelona team although he was unable to demonstrate his own technical skills." Once again, the lowest rated on Chelsea's entire team, except for Terry who got the most stupid red card in UCL history.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...23647/Barcelona-v-Chelsea-player-ratings.html
"Had to wait 14 minutes for his first touch – a cross aimed at Drogba from the right – as the Spaniard had scant chance to show skills" Once again, second lowest rated player aside from John Terry.
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2012/apr/24/barcelona-chelsea-player-ratings
"Rearguarded defensive actions don't suit Matas game and the match passed him for long periods. Worked hard but was subbed off before the hour." Same ratings as the other ones.
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...v-chelsea-player-ratings-7676051.html#gallery
Can't find anything about the Benfica games. Here is the Napoli game:
"Was expected to do work behind Drogba, was quieter than expected." Third lowest rating on entire Chelsea team.
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...-v-napoli-player-ratings-7571160.html#gallery
"Failed to get into the game until the later stages, often pressed out of possession by Inler and Gargano. Took up a more advanced role in the second half." Second lowest rating on team.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...4/Chelsea-v-Napoli-how-the-players-rated.html
"Would have been looked at as a solid performance if not everyone around him rising up to the challenge Napoli presented."
http://m.bleacherreport.com/article...from-blues-4-1-win-in-champions-league/page/5
Various sources that all tell the same exact thing: Mata was a passenger in the majority, if not all of, Chelsea's knockout games. You can say "well he got a corner kick Drogba scored" all you want, but I think it's more laughable to say he was an instrumental part in this campaign when aside from a few goals and an assist, he was a peripheral figure to the other stars. So here are a few smilies