Devil may care
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2010
- Messages
- 35,976
If the plan is to eventually transition to 4-3-3 then I don't see a place for Mata, I can definitely see him and one the strikers not named Rooney being sold next summer.
What's cringeworthy about apologizing to the fans for a loss? Would you prefer if he didn't give a shit?His endless apologizing on twitter is cringeworthy
I can see this. Like you say, he doesn't fit that system, but it's still a system worth moving towards, so so be it.If the plan is to eventually transition to 4-3-3 then I don't see a place for Mata, I can definitely see him and one the strikers not named Rooney being sold next summer.
I can see this. Like you say, he doesn't fit that system, but it's still a system worth moving towards, so so be it.
Herrera is considered a number 10 by Van Gaal.Perhaps the fact he was a Moyes' signing will hurt him? I dunno, as much as I rate him I fully expect van Gaal to utilise Rooney as the no. 10 behind van Persie and Falcao. Hope I'm wrong though, he's a world class goalscorer.
Long-term, yeah, I see us going 4-3-3. So you'd have a midfield three of Blind, Strootman and Herrera. With a front three of di Maria, Rooney and Januzaj.Herrera is considered a number 10 by Van Gaal.
That is why he wants Strootman, 1 DM, 1 Box To box and 1 AM who will drop deep and defend as well as attack.
That would weaken our attack considerably. Unless Januzaj develops the ability to score a lot of goals there'd be far too much pressure on Rooney.Long-term, yeah, I see us going 4-3-3. So you'd have a midfield three of Blind, Strootman and Herrera. With a front three of di Maria, Rooney and Januzaj.
That would weaken our attack considerably. Unless Januzaj develops the ability to score a lot of goals there'd be far too much pressure on Rooney.
That statement loses any semblance of credibility when you take into account RVP's form and overall play, how can someone be unhappy with Rooney as a striker when his partner is as gash as Van Persie has been? Van Persie should have been the first to drop out if form was coming into play.I can see the decision to drop Mata against Leicester, as it was a fast tempo end to end game which wouldn't have suited him.
I am worried though that LVG did state he was not happy with Rooney as a striker, and not happy with Mata as a midfielder.
I don't know. I guess it's the way that Rooney moves. Maybe LVG does not like his strikers to drop deep and act as a 10, rather than lead the last man etc. He clearly likes RVP.That statement loses any semblance of credibility when you take into account RVP's form and overall play, how can someone be unhappy with Rooney as a striker when his partner is as gash as Van Persie has been? Van Persie should have been the first to drop out if form was coming into play.
Secondly dropping Mata in the long run is a shortsighted decision imo, why drop a twenty six year old highly productive player for a player approaching thirty-two, with a dodgy fitness record and who looks to be on the wane ?
Which is worrying isn't it? When he plays someone who is playing crap at the mo - and dropping someone who is playing well?I don't know. I guess it's the way that Rooney moves. Maybe LVG does not like his strikers to drop deep and act as a 10, rather than lead the last man etc. He clearly likes RVP.
I can see the decision to drop Mata against Leicester, as it was a fast tempo end to end game which wouldn't have suited him.
I am worried though that LVG did state he was not happy with Rooney as a striker, and not happy with Mata as a midfielder.
Leicester are no mugs. They've drawn with Everton and also taken Chelsea to the wire at the bridge. On another day with better finishing they could have comfortably scored a few.This is the main problem of that game. We've let a bloody newcommer play a 'fast tempo end to end' game that you'd expect us to play against, don't know, Real Madrid or City, not fecking Leicester.
Which is worrying isn't it? When he plays someone who is playing crap at the mo - and dropping someone who is playing well?
Mata should be a starter for you.
Leicester are no mugs. They've drawn with Everton and also taken Chelsea to the wire at the bridge. On another day with better finishing they could have comfortably scored a few.
I agree it was a poor collapse, but they are actually a good team in great form IMO.
Agree about being in great form but fecking hell, it sounds pathetic that our players are bending over just because some team is in form, what will happen if City or Chelski hit their form? They'll steamroll us 5-3.
I think that Mata would've slowed things down in that game and let us play possession football rather than the end-to-end one we've all witnessed.
That's probably why Van Gaal subbed him on but is that really Mata's style?
He's a really attacking player, who constantly looks to get forward. Never seen him as someone to put his foot on the ball and slow things down. If anything, the opposite.
He's subbed him when it was 3-3 already, right ? Everybody went to shit then, it was pretty much game over. And can't really agree with the second point of yours.
So all you can say about Mata is that he is lightweight?He is a bit lightweight is the only description you can reliably put on him.
You really cant ask him to do anything other than just float around up top near the strikers and look to play it forward or get in the box late, as he just hasnt got it in him.
He is a bit lightweight is the only description you can reliably put on him.
You really cant ask him to do anything other than just float around up top near the strikers and look to play it forward or get in the box late, as he just hasnt got it in him.
lightweight? whats that suppose to mean, that he's not physical enough? granted he's not strong on the ball but his pro's makes up for it, can linkup with players around him so much quicker than the likes of Rooney, has great spacial awareness, brilliant skills with the ball, provides great movement off the ball and score goals. Condemning him for making a unfair mistake against Leicester is harsh considering he came on as a sub and didnt settle in the pace of the game quick enough. Leicester were pump full of adrenaline with the comeback when Uniteds morale was waaaay down.
So all you can say about Mata is that he is lightweight?
How did you manage to extrapolate that, from what I said?
You've managed to come up with a whole argument by yourself.
Mata's overall contribution hasn't been amazing so far this season, to be fair. Looked good against QPR but who didn't?
RvP has been awful though. Probably the only United player who didn't even impress against QPR. No idea what he has to do to get dropped.
Well thats clearly not true. He's not been great, but he's not been awful. Awful would be your boy Rooney, when he's going through one of his regular, couldn't control a football to save his life routines.
But hey, your agenda against any player not called Rooney has recently reached new heights, with you seemingly spending most of your time on here just defending Rooney and putting every other player down.
i was making a detailed point to you that he doesnt just "float" around up top, like he doesnt do anything impressive. You mentioned his major flaw but didnt acknowledge what he brings more to the squad. What im saying is dont judge a player before weighing the pros & cons. His tracking back is a liability at times but in attacking terms just out weighs that con.
I too was looking this as I heard, Mata was buying a flat for his dad in Manchester, they have been putting off completing on the purchase for the last month or so. Word has it from the agent who organised the deal that Mata may be leaving, so of course it makes no sense for him to buy his dad a flat in a place where Mata won't be any longer.How would I go about finding out the odds on Mata to leave United?