He's meant to be a striker. Touches and flicks can fuxk off.Decent today, nice touches, flick ons and good passing range. Jurys still very much out though.
He's meant to be a striker. Touches and flicks can fuxk off.
Everything I see of him is that of a 10. Maybe Amorim will finally play him there if he uses his Sporting formation.
He's meant to be a striker. Touches and flicks can fuxk off.
He's getting the feck out of the way and hoping to take a defender with him... Did nothing wrong thereWorrying the way for the third goal he instinctively runs into Garnacho's space on the left, or seems to be doing. A natural striker (which he isn't, by his own admission) would have run towards the centre spot. For that goal, he's kind of nowhere.
Hopefully things will work out, and he does have some balling ability and potential, but he just seems neither one thing nor the other in terms of his position.
Fair point, but his initial movement should have been to make a run towards the centre. He does eventually provide an option but the way he is in Garnacho's space just looks sloppy and he almost messes up the attack. He just doesn't do much off the ball.He's getting the feck out of the way and hoping to take a defender with him... Did nothing wrong there
Isn't that where Bruno is going to play though ?Just like others have said, he seems suited to that left half space in Amorims system. It gives me hope at least
Like you, I still have hope for this guy, but I also see why a large section of the fan base is worried.Yeah, he’s never a 9. But a good age to be a potential long term replacement for Bruno. So definitely worth keeping round. Been bugging me how many people have completely written him off already.
Like you, I still have hope for this guy, but I also see why a large section of the fan base is worried.
I didn't watch this guy at Bologna (I don’t know if you did?) but, when it became clear we were going for him, I looked up a lot of his videos (which I know isn't a good way to judge a player!) and everything I saw there was that of a 10, too.
These videos from an Arsenal scouting YouTube channel funnily enough were my favourites because he actually left in his errors to give you a full picture of his game:
They were specifically highlighting his dribbling and hold-up play, and the way he dropped deep, brought his teammates into play and generally carried the ball under pressure seemed very promising. Those attributes seemed (and still do) to be his best, and I think the 10 position is where we could get full use out of them.
We saw glimpses of it last night after he came on. There was a moment he came deep, was under pressure but easily turned his man, played a nice pass out to the right and we were immediately on the attack. Instead of competing with Hojlund, I think they could play together. Especially if Amorim plans on using two 10s.
That's understandable. The youtuber that made the videos above actually made one on his defensive work, too, but it appears to have been deleted. From what I remember, he did press and track back, but seeing how hard someone works out of possession is hard to judge outside of real time games.That's what I'm thinking too. That he could be the 10/inside foward. The only I think he might run into is the intensity.
That's understandable. The youtuber that made the videos above actually made one on his defensive work, too, but it appears to have been deleted. From what I remember, he did press and track back, but seeing how hard someone works out of possession is hard to judge outside of real time games.
There was a point against Leicester where we lost the ball in their half, and Zirkzee busted a gut to get back which stopped them from progressing too far into our half. That was as nice to see as some of his work on the ball.
Speaking of his performance, someone made a video of it:
They didn't include the tracking back part but everything else seems to be there. You can see that if he can potentially replicate his Bologna form here, he could be a real asset when dropping deep and getting us up the pitch. You can also see why playing him with Hojlund could be an alternative because the times he dropped deep to get us up the pitch, we had no one centrally once the wide player got the ball, so if he can do that with Hojlund occupying that space, we could potentially create more chances in general.
If this is true... I really wouldn't mind it tbh.
There's clearly technical ability there, let's get behind the lad for a season at least and see what he can do.
I remember back when we were actually good, players regularly took 12-18 months to properly settle but it went under the radar because results were good.
Also...remember Forlan? The fans never turned on him and he ended up showing what a quality player he was, albeit not quite at United.