Jose Mourinho | 2017/18 Assessments | Poll Added

Your stance


  • Total voters
    1,563
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
But scoring them does and at some point you have to take risks at home, like when we conceded the first goal, the reaction was better and it resulted in a goal. Why do we have to wait to concede to react, why can't we do that from the start ?

That's something I'll agree with you on. We are capable of playing football, we were the better team after they scored in the first half and the start of the second half. We need to stop being so reactionary though, whether that comes from the manager or the players, I don't know. Regardless, Mourinho needs to sort that out. If we want to win things we need to be far more ruthless and start games strong. We did so at Arsenal and you saw how that panned out.
 
The fact is that City had won every single game bar one this season, and it's almost Christmas. Even a peak Fergie team would be struggling to keep up with that sort of pace. We are the best of the rest as it stands, and that's something to be pretty pleased with given our last few seasons.
It's cool that you look at it that way. Btw, I don't believe a peak Fergie team would be 11 points behind at this stage. Regardless of how well City would be playing, we would still be somewhat giving them a run for their money.

This is not to say that the point difference is not recoverable, it is football afterall but the difference at this stage (not even half way into the season) is something that you'd expect to find in leagues that have just one runaway leader like Bayern Munich or Juventus. Unless we want to conclude that the difference between City and United is the same difference between Bayern and Wolfsburg because that is the way people are making it look like now.

@NinjaZombie
 
It should and is. We're obviously falling short of that but I'm a realist. They've been a better team than us for four years and they've spent more money too so what do we actually expect? I think we're better than we were a year ago and while we can continue to improve then I'll continue to back Mourinho. When we don't then I'll be of the opinion it's time for change.
We could be incrementally better than a year before and still be failing to meet our objectives. What do we expect? To be good enough to take on every team even if we don't always succeed. We played like cowards today.

I don't have an issue with those that back the manager. But do you really not expect us being 11 points behind City and beaten by at home afterward a thoroughly simplistic and archaic peformance from us, to not result in fan style being disappointed?
 
Had time to calm down now. Shocking tactics from Mourinho at home in a must win game. The ball retention was nil, we bypassed our midfield time and time again. Awful to watch.
 
As expected people are going mental in here, said it couple of hours ago that folks who are happy with the lineup will be the ones tearing into him later.

I don’t think we as a team are ready to win big prizes yet, lack of composure is something a manager can’t help with. Against Arsenal we pressed from the front and got a 2 goal lead, rest of the time we made one shit clearances after another and seemed incapable of stringing two passes together.

Ditto again today, if you know your players can’t cope against press then wouldn’t bypassing that and going direct be the logical choice? That’s what he did today but we seem incapable of winning 2nd ball too which serves up the shite we saw today.

People will whine about how he doesn’t let our attackers have a go, but they had 30 mins today to do that as City shut up shop and played without any CF during that period. Were they able to do anything? Any time they were pressed, ball was passed backwards or hoofed up top, even players like Martial and Rashford couldn’t take on players. Not everything can be copped onto the manager, players have to shoulder the blame too.

Great post! Agree with it all!
 
They're not beating us in a one off through. They're 11 points ahead. That should be hard to digest.

And what you spend defines your ambition. United and City spend the most and hence have the highest expectations. Not sure why is this is hard to digest.
It's not a linear correlation between spending and ambition as you suggest. Either way, last year our team looked much better than theirs but this year they seem to have clicked and are in amazing form.

We can definitely talk about the approach and tactics but bringing up spending on the back of a 2-1 loss is not required IMO.
 
We've been poor in midfield in every game Herrera and Matic have played together this season. We simply look clueless in keeping the ball with Pogba and Felllaini out. So I don't get why some of you expected any different against a City team that has the best midfield in the league and creates overloads of up to 4 or 5 players in the middle at times.

It wasn't pretty but going long was the easiest out ball seeing as only Matic was capable of displaying composure in possession out of the two CMs and back 4.

The goals we conceded weren't anything to do with Mourinho so how he's getting blamed I don't know.
 
That's something I'll agree with you on. We are capable of playing football, we were the better team after they scored in the first half and the start of the second half. We need to stop being so reactionary though, whether that comes from the manager or the players, I don't know. Regardless, Mourinho needs to sort that out. If we want to win things we need to be far more ruthless and start games strong. We did so at Arsenal and you saw how that panned out.
This is also Liverpool does well at Anfield. Yes they are below in the table but they do certain things right. Football at this level, it's fine margins, psychological strength can be a boost.
 
For a start, having 11 behind the ball at home and not knowing how to control city is something Jose has to take the blame for. 20% possession at home. Pathetic and United are not that behind city in terms of talent, but are being forced to play Jose's idiotic hoofball to an out of form striker who he brought. He is 100% to blame.
So you're answer it to try and outplay City at their game and go against how United have player for the past 2 years? Jose will never have his teams play like Pep. We all knew that when he was hired, don't expect something different now. Also City dominated the midfield but hardly created any real chances. So he obviously knew how to control city. We had our chances and didn't finish, and of story. Thats not on the manager it's on the players.
 
Don't disagree but was he really suppose to know that Herrera would be shit this season? LB and RW are our main weakness but Mikhi was bought to be on the right side and has been shit. We can't just completely overhaul the squad, you expect a good manager to make players better.
Yeah, agreed. Not only his players haven't performed well, he hasn't made the existing ones play better, with a couple of exceptions of course.
 
All goals are scored from mistakes by defenders. There's general mistakes than there's Lukaku choosing to smash the ball into a crowd of City players instead of clearing it literally any other direction. You can't gift two goals as comically as we did, especially when we're handicapped, playing our second string defence and without Pogba against the best team in the league and expect to get anything out of the game.

They weren't looking threatening at all, both their goals were from terrible clearances by Lukaku. He just looked starstruck, the game was too big for him.

Their first goal wasn't much of a mistake imo, those things happen after a corner.

Hard to blame Lukaku when for 99% of the time he's running all over the place and trying to scrape something out of the hoof balls that are pretty much the only service he's getting for most of the games, and then when opportunity presents itself we expect him to be flawless.

That's not how real football works unfortunately.
 
Perisic would not solve issue of Herrera and Matic which you talking about.
We might not sign a player but we have spend enough money on player in past 2 summer, I couldn't ask more.
Its now up to him to make it happen.

I'm not saying Perisic would have fixed that problem, I'm giving you possible proof as to why we maybe didn't have funds to buy a midfielder. Like I said, we had a lot of positions in the squad that needed to be improved, in fact I'd argue our fullbacks could still be improved, maybe a number 10 and a right winger too. We are playing Rashford out right who simply isn't ever going to be good there.

We don't have unlimited funds.
 
We will never know if we don't try. That's my main gripe, we're not going to change this tired formula of his once in a while. Sure there aren't guarantees and we're all speculating/venting at this point but this feels like so expected.
We did try in the last 30 minutes. They were playing without a CF as well. The sad truth is that our players are not comfortable on the ball and cannot hold possession when subjected to intense pressing. As I said, if we had committed players forward in the early stages and then lost possession in midfield, we would have been 2-3 goals down by half-time.
 
Lukaku is a bit of a scapegoat here. Don't be fooled by his size; he is nothing special in the air. Don't let his appearance of being strong confuse you either; It's useless on the pitch most of the time due to his overall lack of technical ability.

In other words, he's a pretty shit striker, which I agree with.
 
That's something I'll agree with you on. We are capable of playing football, we were the better team after they scored in the first half and the start of the second half. We need to stop being so reactionary though, whether that comes from the manager or the players, I don't know. Regardless, Mourinho needs to sort that out. If we want to win things we need to be far more ruthless and start games strong. We did so at Arsenal and you saw how that panned out.
You do know but refuse to admit of course. We didn't sit back in our half like scared kittens because the players felt like it. It was an obvious tactic. We did the same vs Arsenal except there we pressed when level as opposed to when behind. The latter made no sense whatsoever.

It's not a linear correlation between spending and ambition as you suggest. Either way, last year our team looked much better than theirs but this year they seem to have clicked and are in amazing form.

We can definitely talk about the approach and tactics but bringing up spending on the back of a 2-1 loss is not required IMO.
It's a pretty linear correlation. I'll decide what's required in he content of my posts. Thank you.
 
Nice, this thread is alive again. All those that were lurking in the shadows can step again in the spotlight and have a contest like "who can say the worst thing about mourinho".

You can use variations of defensive tactic, hoof ball and so.
Doesn't make it wrong, does it?
 
Copying that from the post match thread, because it belongs here even more.

Outclassed again. Lukaku missing that sitter was shit, but we don't deserve anything again after such a peformance. People don't want to admit or want to hear it, but Mourinho looks like a dinosaur in big games these days. No pressing, no pressure, no attacking plan in general, we just try to get the ball when they are in or around our penalty area and then we need to hoof it because we are under consistent pressure or even if we get it out we need to bypass the whole pitch with long runs with the ball or again hoofing. It's a shit tactics for our attackers and our defenders. We don't have Messi who can just take the ball and run past 5 players and we don't have guys like Rio or Vidic either who can compete with these kind of pressure for 90 minutes (De Gea tries his best to do it though). People complain about us not capable of stringing 2 passes together and yeah our passing isn't good enough, but we shouldn't ignore the fact that our players are everytime in situations where they need to clear the ball from danger or need to play it forward as fast as possible to get anything going forward. It's a shit approach and I don't know what Jose wants to achieve with it. And no forget that Arsenal game, we can't hope that we face a team who just gifts us 2 goals in the first 10 minutes, that will rarely happen against the bigger teams. We looked shit and clueless in all big games, even in those 2 which we won and we really need to find a solution for that and not just throw money at it. I don't know how people can have any confidence in us kicking out Bayern, Juve or Real. We will either park the bus for 180 minutes and still go out close or they will wipe the floor with us in one game and decide the tie.


And after I got a answer that Jose is not to blame when our players do stupid mistakes and that he is a big improvement on Moyes and LvG

No one has any doubts about that, but is it good enough going forward? We are Manchester United, we should compete for the biggest titles and it doesn't look like we will get close with Jose, if we play like this in the big games and there have been more than enough games to make a judgment like this so far imo. This year it might be enough to beat the smaller teams more often than not and finish 2nd, but we clearly want to evolve further, aren't we? And I am not sure what Jose wants to do about it. Most likely he will try to spend big again to get us top attackers to do the job for him, but is that the best solution? I am not calling for his head, but there are clear issues we can talk about. Right now I don't think he looks like a top top manager, let alone the best in the world and probably not worth that huge amount of money we pay him, but yeah he is a huge improvement over Moyes and LvG, not a single doubt about it.
I can't really agree with the "Jose can't do anything about defenders doing stupid things to concede goals" line, like I mentioned already Jose puts us in those pressure situations all the time, our players are just on the backfoot all the time, you cant get away with it. If you are under consistent pressure, you will make mistakes, you will do silly mistakes, it's a shitty approach and we are only winning games if our players play flawless or De Gea pulls a 11/10 performance out of his ass again and that is clearly showing that our game plan is the wrong one. The City players make shitty mistakes too, but they are still winning because their game plan doesn't rely on their defenders and goalkeeper having a perfect day and their attackers creating and scoring out of nothing in every big game and that's how it should be.


And again I am not calling for his head, 2nd and maybe competing for a cup (don't think we have any chance in the CL) wouldn't be that bad and won't be a sackable offence. But we are talking about Jose Mourinho here, one of the supposed best managers in the game, one of the highest earners in the game. We are talking about Manchester United. My expectations are high for a reason and we won't be happy with just finish 2nd or 3rd in the future and we shouldn't be happy with playing like that in the big games, especially if we want to make a deep run in Europe at some point. Is Jose delievering what we expected from him and what a world class manager should do? Would it be any worse with any other good manager, maybe less consistent, maybe better and more entertaining in the big games? We clearly aren't in the dark days of Moyes and LvG anymore, but I don't think we are anywhere close where we should be either and I am not sure we will achieve it with Jose after what we saw in his 1,5 years so far.
 
It's cool that you look at it that way. Btw, I don't believe a peak Fergie team would be 11 points behind at this stage. Regardless of how well City would be playing, we would still be somewhat giving them a run for their money.

This is not to say that the point difference is not recoverable, it is football afterall but the difference at this stage (not even half way into the season) is something that you'd expect to find in leagues that have just one runaway leader like Bayern Munich or Juventus. Unless we want to conclude that the difference between City and United is the same difference between Bayern and Wolfsburg because that is the way people are making it look like now.
Your Bayern comparison is interesting, because they are runaway leaders, top of a "weaker" league, with 35 points from 15 games. We also picked up 35 points from our first 15 games but apparently it's unacceptable?
 
We did try in the last 30 minutes. They were playing without a CF as well. The sad truth is that our players are not comfortable on the ball and cannot hold possession when subjected to intense pressing. As I said, if we had committed players forward in the early stages and then lost possession in midfield, we would have been 2-3 goals down by half-time.
From the kick off I meant, we're showing intent only as a reaction. We're not proactive enough.
 
Their first goal wasn't much of a mistake imo, those things happen after a corner.

Hard to blame Lukaku when for 99% of the time he's running all over the place and trying to scrape something out of the hoof balls that are pretty much the only service he's getting for most of the games, and then when opportunity presents itself we expect him to be flawless.

That's not how real football works unfortunately.

That has literally nothing to do with what I suggested. If it's hard to blame Lukaku for being a professional footballer who can't clear a ball, then I really don't know what's worthy of blame. He had no City players to the left of him, yet he smashes it to his crowded right, full of City players. He had one of the worst performances I've seen from a United player in a long time, he genuinely just looked starstruck as if the stage was too big for him. His pass to Herrera for the second (first?) goal, was diabolical and was what they got the freekick, which is where he assisted them from. What makes it more baffling was Rashford was on the last man and was most likely through had Lukaku played the ball forwards rather than taking the riskier backpass.

Hoofball is a genuine concern, I don't enjoy it either, but we are shit without Pogba and lose the midfield battle. We don't have anyone that can deal with the press so it's the most logical option. Until we get another player who can actually retain the ball when pressed and make offensive runs with the ball from midfield, it's going to continue that way imo.
 
We could be incrementally better than a year before and still be failing to meet our objectives. What do we expect? To be good enough to take on every team even if we don't always succeed. We played like cowards today.

I don't have an issue with those that back the manager. But do you really not expect us being 11 points behind City and beaten by at home afterward a thoroughly simplistic and archaic peformance from us, to not result in fan style being disappointed?
Of course people are going to be disappointed that we lost but I'm just not sure what we can expect at the moment. The team isn't even close to being as good as Man City's.

I agree with the frustration at not having a go at them because I think that's the way to beat them but I think ultimately it will end in the same way. City will win the league because they're the best team by a long distance. I also feel that we play better football than we have since Fergie in most games so I've seen enough of an improvement to not be furious at every defeat. Mourinho will always play this way but he's shown before he can make it work and I think he can here with a better team too.

We could get rid of Mourinho and the odds will be that we will continue to be second best to them until such time as our squad improves. Did people really think this squad was good enough?
 
I think everyone need to calm down and objectively assess the season so far. Naturally considering how much we've spent we should be behind city and ahead the rest of the league and that's where we are at the moment. City's unbelievable form this season has made the rest of the league look poor.

My biggest worry with our manager is the insistence on building a team with more emphasis on physical attributes rather than technical ability. The game has moved on from this sort of attributes and we as a club must look to move on too.

Having spent this much I expect us to show more ability on the ball against decent opposition.
Am inclined to support the manager but he must show a clear intent to build a philosophy that will ake us closer to the rest of Europe.We won't close the gap with someone of Smalling's technical ability in defence or Lukaku's in attack.

All in all I implore everyone to calm down, make objective and constructive criticism of our current position.With the rest of Europe not particularly in their attractive best for talent this is our opportunity to close the gap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Snowjoe
It's not a linear correlation between spending and ambition as you suggest. Either way, last year our team looked much better than theirs but this year they seem to have clicked and are in amazing form.

We can definitely talk about the approach and tactics but bringing up spending on the back of a 2-1 loss is not required IMO.

This really hasn't been the case at all.
 
Jose has brought us on leaps and bounds, there's no doubt about that. But he needs to stop worrying about who we're playing and start worrying about what he can control; we have a good squad of players - as good as anyone outside City in this league - give them the confidence to play their own game. Stop reacting and start imposing ourselves. So Pogba was out today - can we really not find a way to play around this? The squad is full of talented players - make it work, don't submit before a ball is kicked. Players get injured, you don't just give up... What must this must be doing to the confidence and moral in the team... "You're no good enough to go and win this" is the message.

But will Jose ever change? I think he probably needs to if he wants a long and successful stint here. Sure, in another world City would have dropped points this season and we'd be right up there, but we can't be waiting for others to fall away to win things.
 
As expected people are going mental in here, said it couple of hours ago that folks who are happy with the lineup will be the ones tearing into him later.

I don’t think we as a team are ready to win big prizes yet, lack of composure is something a manager can’t help with. Against Arsenal we pressed from the front and got a 2 goal lead, rest of the time we made one shit clearances after another and seemed incapable of stringing two passes together.

Ditto again today, if you know your players can’t cope against press then wouldn’t bypassing that and going direct be the logical choice? That’s what he did today but we seem incapable of winning 2nd ball too which serves up the shite we saw today.

People will whine about how he doesn’t let our attackers have a go, but they had 30 mins today to do that as City shut up shop and played without any CF during that period. Were they able to do anything? Any time they were pressed, ball was passed backwards or hoofed up top, even players like Martial and Rashford couldn’t take on players. Not everything can be copped onto the manager, players have to shoulder the blame too.

There's literally nothing wrong with that being true.

I was happy with the line up. It also told me nothing about how we would play and how it seemed Mourinho had set us up. The line up is just a selection of your players (ideally your better players). We can criticise anything we like after kick off provided it's not the selection of players.
 
But scoring them does and at some point you have to take risks at home, like when we conceded the first goal, the reaction was better and it resulted in a goal. Why do we have to wait to concede to react, why can't we do that from the start ?
We got cut up on the counter at the end, that's why. Didn't you notice Sterling playing in midfield in the first half? That's not good conditions to press. That's not good conditions to press. It doesn't even have to be a tactical thing, it can be a mental thing. You normally won't push up if you feel like there's going to be gaps in the midfield.
 
Herrera has always not been that good - but Jose is inhibiting him from playing his natural game as much as LVG did. Odd to blame it just on Herrera - who had some technical capabilities at least once in a whilst
 
Nice, this thread is alive again. All those that were lurking in the shadows can step again in the spotlight and have a contest like "who can say the worst thing about mourinho".

You can use variations of defensive tactic, hoof ball and so.
Yeah there are those who come here purely to shit on the manager, but there are just many self righteous posters who love to moralise about what good fans they are for not criticising the manager...
 
That has literally nothing to do with what I suggested. If it's hard to blame Lukaku for being a professional footballer who can't clear a ball, then I really don't know what's worthy of blame. He had no City players to the left of him, yet he smashes it to his crowded right, full of City players. He had one of the worst performances I've seen from a United player in a long time, he genuinely just looked starstruck as if the stage was too big for him. His pass to Herrera for the second (first?) goal, was diabolical and was what they got the freekick, which is where he assisted them from. What makes it more baffling was Rashford was on the last man and was most likely through had Lukaku played the ball forwards rather than taking the riskier backpass.

Hoofball is a genuine concern, I don't enjoy it either, but we are shit without Pogba and lose the midfield battle. We don't have anyone that can deal with the press so it's the most logical option. Until we get another player who can actually retain the ball when pressed and make offensive runs with the ball from midfield, it's going to continue that way imo.

I was addressing the missed chance…

Also with Pogba in team we still went back to ball hoofing in some matches.
 
He is incapable of coaching his teams to bypass the press without resorting to hoofs.
 
Agreed. They're ahead of us at the moment.

That's not defeatist, that's just seeing things as they are. I had hopes of winning the league this season before Pogba got sent off. I'm not a defeatist. Besides, even if I was, I can hardly influence how the football club is ran, can I?
Im also not being defeatist, rather realist, and wish all our fans had the maturity to accept such.

Being the best of the best takes a lot of hrs work and many year to achieve.

Facts are facts: we bungled the post SAF era, City got head and that gap is what’s keeping them ahead right now.
 
Com
Copying that from the post match thread, because it belongs here even more.




And after I got a answer that Jose is not to blame when our players do stupid mistakes and that he is a big improvement on Moyes and LvG




And again I am not calling for his head, 2nd and maybe competing for a cup (don't think we have any chance in the CL) wouldn't be that bad and won't be a sackable offence. But we are talking about Jose Mourinho here, one of the supposed best managers in the game, one of the highest earners in the game. We are talking about Manchester United. My expectations are high for a reason and we won't be happy with just finish 2nd or 3rd in the future and we shouldn't be happy with playing like that in the big games, especially if we want to make a deep run in Europe at some point. Is Jose delievering what we expected from him and what a world class manager should do? Would it be any worse with any other good manager, maybe less consistent, maybe better and more entertaining in the big games? We clearly aren't in the dark days of Moyes and LvG anymore, but I don't think we are anywhere close where we should be either and I am not sure we will achieve it with Jose after what we saw in his 1,5 years so far.
Completely agree with every word you said, saved my time typing.
 
Your Bayern comparison is interesting, because they are runaway leaders, top of a "weaker" league, with 35 points from 15 games. We also picked up 35 points from our first 15 games but apparently it's unacceptable?

They aren't really the best example, they sacked a manager already for a reason despite beeing top or near the top of the table. They are improving now under Jupp. I don't think 35 points is bad, but we already lost 3 games having played less than a half of the season. So in the end we could lose 6,7 games? That's hardly a title winning record either even if we ignore City's outstanding form.
 
Your Bayern comparison is interesting, because they are runaway leaders, top of a "weaker" league, with 35 points from 15 games. We also picked up 35 points from our first 15 games but apparently it's unacceptable?
Mate, are you going to use number of points to cover the reality of the point difference? Whether we have 35 points or 15 points, the fact still remains that we are 11 points behind after 16 games. How can you paint this any other way?
Bloody hell, 12 points if we are going to add the crazy GD.
 
You do know but refuse to admit of course. We didn't sit back in our half like scared kittens because the players felt like it. It was an obvious tactic. We did the same vs Arsenal except there we pressed when level as opposed to when behind. The latter made no sense whatsoever.


It's a pretty linear correlation. I'll decide what's required in he content of my posts. Thank you.

I really don't. If he wanted to play like 'scared kittens' whatever the feck that means, he would have went with a defensive formation and defensive personnel. He didn't. He could have very easily not played with width and crowded the middle of the pitch, putting Lingard as a third CM and playing with 3 defenders. I think he went for it this game, we just aren't very good without Pogba. You can't win games of this stature when you have two holding midfielders, especially when we are so reliant on creativity from midfield. We were getting destroyed in midfield and against a team like City, that's never going to end well.

Like I said - whether it's down to Jose or the players I don't know. It's something we need to desperately improve though as we are capable of playing football, we just don't do it unless we have to.
 
Im also not being defeatist, rather realist, and wish all our fans had the maturity to accept such.

Being the best of the best takes a lot of hrs work and many year to achieve.

Facts are facts: we bungled the post SAF era, City got head and that gap is what’s keeping them ahead right now.

Oh give over. Can't any of you just stick to the discussion/argument.

Nobody is denying that it takes time. What we're asking is if Mourinho is the man for that long-term build (because he sure as hell doesn't have a history of doing so).
 
We did try in the last 30 minutes. They were playing without a CF as well. The sad truth is that our players are not comfortable on the ball and cannot hold possession when subjected to intense pressing. As I said, if we had committed players forward in the early stages and then lost possession in midfield, we would have been 2-3 goals down by half-time.

This is something you address in training ground.

City, Liverpool and somewhat Spurs weren't the possession juggernauts they are now under their previous managers. They are like that because their current managers have installed that in them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.