Supporting Manchester United must be so miserable for you. Dear oh dearGot tactically outclassed. Personnel quality made the difference. Any other day this was lost.
Supporting Manchester United must be so miserable for you. Dear oh dearGot tactically outclassed. Personnel quality made the difference. Any other day this was lost.
Haha it'd okay - some of us new the 352 with lingard in behind 2 strikers were going to happen; people who kind of understood what LVG was trying to do & didn't lose their hats at Lingards poor performances.
Got to give him credit though right? Unearthed a good player at least.
Not following the thread i see.Supporting Manchester United must be so miserable for you. Dear oh dear
Called it perfectly in terms of tactics. I felt that we always had it in us to score whatever was required to win this game.It was a Jose special tonight.
You were taking this piss? Apologies !Not following the thread i see.
It's been either hyper praise or hyper negativity lately. I should be careful about using sarcasm on the internet though, especially I who is not very good at it.You were taking this piss? Apologies !
Haha it'd okay - some of us new the 352 with lingard in behind 2 strikers were going to happen; people who kind of understood what LVG was trying to do & didn't lose their hats at Lingards poor performances.
Got to give him credit though right? Unearthed a good player at least.
No manager deserves praise for a performance like that.
No manager deserves praise for a performance like that.
No team conceding 33 shots and has their keeper as the MOTM played well and had a good tactical match.Can you expand this a little bit? You don't think we were tactically good/played well?
No manager deserves praise for a performance like that.
Wait a sec. Your thread got locked, so you will continue to spit this nonsense in other threads now?
LVG has jackshit with this. We played 352 with a minimum amount of possession and quick counter. Aside from the fact that LVG played 352 for around 5 games in United which has been pointed multiple time to you. Either you're on the wum or you don't know what you're talking. It's boring either way.
Yep. You're right.
Lingard scoring today and against Watford, is all down to LVG.
The 3-5-2 formation works brilliantly for counter attacks. But something was missing in our defensive play today. Arsenal were playing through our midfield as if it were nonexistent. 33 attempts for goal were too many to concede. They are good in attack but they are not Madrid, Barca or PSG.
The perfect Jose team is not only about brilliant counter attacks but also about brillaint defence. Once he finds the ballance, the team will be scary for the opposition.
Can you expand this a little bit? You don't think we were tactically good/played well?
The 3-5-2 formation works brilliantly for counter attacks. But something was missing in our defensive play today. Arsenal were playing through our midfield as if it were nonexistent. 33 attempts for goal were too many to concede. They are good in attack but they are not Madrid, Barca or PSG.
The perfect Jose team is not only about brilliant counter attacks but also about brillaint defence. Once he finds the ballance, the team will be scary for the opposition.
Why do you keep replying to me if I stress you out and wind you up- I just don't understand? We ended up the second season with rashford martial & lingard in a front 3; only a rugby fan couldn't see that we were reverting back to 352 that clearly does not work with forwards like Falcao, RVP, Rooney (basically 3x Lukaku).
Let me guess - after 1/3 of the season messing around the rubbish that is 4231, after playing every AM except Lingard for countless games & finally picking him; after playing every LB we have including players hat are not LB except young, after wasting our best attacking players like martial & rashford on the wing- we change formation, chose the players that work because José is some sort of genius? Credit I am happy he is reverting back his mistakes; but he understands that 352 is what United need to perfect to be the best club in the league & in the world. That has its root cause somewhere long time ago rather than just a week or two ago so please don't call me a wind up merchant for actually stringing things together and recognising certain things that you hadn't. Remember my thread about ' is it time we settle to 352' - see when that was made?
I love a bit of theory - that's just who I am - if I annoy you I am sorry & you should just avoid me.
Mourinho can't win these people. They complain when he goes defensive away from home against top six sides and ask for attacking football so then they get an entertaining game and still moan.
We sat off and invited pressure and were very lucky to only concede 1 goal, let alone have a clean sheet at half time.
Mourinho can't win these people. They complain when he goes defensive away from home against top six sides and ask for attacking football so then they get an entertaining game and still moan.
Arsenal also could have conceded more than they did, once we were two up in 10 minutes they threw out any caution they had when starting the game. The scoreline could have been anythingWe sat off and invited pressure and were very lucky to only concede 1 goal, let alone have a clean sheet at half time.
But but that's not the United way...Entertaining AND winning. Jesus, I would have settled for a dour 0-1.
No team conceding 33 shots and has their keeper as the MOTM played well and had a good tactical match.
Arsenal also could have conceded more than they did, once we were two up in 10 minutes they threw out any caution they had when starting the game. The scoreline could have been anything
They created chance after chance for spells that we couldn't even launch counters. Them looking impotent after us going down to 10 is as much to do with our 3rd goal than anything. Think that knocked the stuffing out of them especially as it came after DDG had, had a divine moment.You can clearly see the difference in their chances when we truly close the shop with a 10 man and when we wanted to hurt them on the counter.
But, everyone will obviously see what he wants to see.
Because I genuinely can't understand how you can contribute this to LVG. It's baffling to me, seeing the way we play. He had to rip most of what LVG did and start over.
But, I would agree with your last sentence.
Not a fan of his in-game management today, the switch to a midfield 3 came too late. It was evident when Mustafi went off and Arsenal switched up their formation that we were getting outnumbered in midfield.
Wait a sec. Your thread got locked, so you will continue to spit this nonsense in other threads now?
LVG has jackshit with this. We played 352 with a minimum amount of possession and quick counter. Aside from the fact that LVG played 352 for around 5 games in United which has been pointed multiple time to you. Either you're on the wum or you don't know what you're talking. It's boring either way.
They created chance after chance for spells that we couldn't even launch counters. Them looking impotent after us going down to 10 is as much to do with our 3rd goal than anything. Think that knocked the stuffing out of them especially as it came after DDG had, had a divine moment.
We looked dangerous every time we went on the counter. We clearly set up to attack with pace, purpose and in numbers. We were also set up to press them and disrupt them high up the pitch.
Seeing the way in which we scored those 3 goals, you don't think we were tactically good?
I guess we should have then set up like against Liverpool. Because we definitely could do that and there was no way they could hurt us, seeing how they dealt with 10 men. But, as I remember many weren't happy with that.
He seems to have a few managers down to a tee and knows how to get under their skin. Not sure if the stats would support me but Wenger seems to be one of them. I usually expect Mourinho to win in this duel for some reason.
This being said, our defense did look shaky on a personnel level several times. Did you guys notice Pogba screaming at the people around him to push up? Wonder what the instructions from the dugout were.
We did this for large portions of the game.
We looked dangerous every time we went on the counter. We clearly set up to attack with pace, purpose and in numbers. We were also set up to press them and disrupt them high up the pitch.
Seeing the way in which we scored those 3 goals, you don't think we were tactically good?
I guess we should have then set up like against Liverpool. Because we definitely could do that and there was no way they could hurt us, seeing how they dealt with 10 men. But, as I remember many weren't happy with that.