Maybe I misunderstood him but people need to watch the games.This 100%.
Rashford, Lukaku and Zlatan did not bother defending, that is how open we were. If we had defended we would have drawn.
Maybe I misunderstood him but people need to watch the games.This 100%.
Rashford, Lukaku and Zlatan did not bother defending, that is how open we were. If we had defended we would have drawn.
@Josep Dowling. The tactics tonight was clearly to go out and win the game with the way we played in the first half. We didn't sit back.
The game in Russia would've been a much better place to rest quite a few players. I agree with giving some minutes to a few people today. Let me be honest though,
If this was a one off, i would be right there with you. If this was just a plan gone wrong because of whatever reason, i would be happy to keep calm and move on. A creeping feeling of mine, however, is that i've seen these showings already. I've seen them against top and mediocre clubs. How often can we rely on someone to score one of 2-3 chances? Why can't we let some young players loose and see what happens, instead of losing with the first team? There are many approaches and this is getting old. I just think we can do better and should aspire to do so, not coward way in the safe zone.
Firstly, there would be comments, obviously, not to the same degree though (see all the whinging during later years). Secondly, it still have nothing to do with media influence just a simple fact that even playing against not the greatest of opposition we choose to be very conservative which backfires more often than not, hence the annoyance. No one is saying that we're defensive at home, isn't it? Since, that's obviously not true, so not sure the need to defend something relentlessly that is rightfully being criticized.Would these comments have been made when Fergie was manager and we set up differently away from home in the CL? No. We should have been 3-0 up at HT.
Are you saying we set up to draw from the start? If so we didn't watch the same match.Mourinho played for the point. The only clear cut chance created was the Fellaini header. One chance against a supposedly inferior team.
We didn’t try to win that game. I’m a José fan btw, just think he got it wrong tonight.
Mourinho played for the point. The only clear cut chance created was the Fellaini header. One chance against a supposedly inferior team.
We didn’t try to win that game. I’m a José fan btw, just think he got it wrong tonight.
Let's just agree to disagree then. Majority for me means most of. Half of the game is not most of. Clear cut chances meas something else to me. Let's move on shall we?Young players such Lukaku, Rashford, Pogba, Martial and Lingard, all of whom are under 25?
There werent two or three chances, we created 5 or 6 clear cut chances.
I agree we were negative against Liverpool and, to some extent, Chelsea but always felt injuries hampered us. We were positive for majority of todays game.
Firstly, there would be comments, obviously, not to the same degree though (see all the whinging during later years). Secondly, it still have nothing to do with media influence just a simple fact that even playing against not the greatest of opposition we choose to be very conservative which backfires more often than not, hence the annoyance. No one is saying that we're defensive at home, isn't it? Since, that's obviously not true, so not sure the need to defend something relentlessly that is rightfully being criticized.
When Fergie set up his team differently in CL, it was never described as 'negative' or 'defensive'. When Mourinho does it though, what is being said? People are brainwashed by the fecking media.
When Fergie set up his team differently in CL, it was never described as 'negative' or 'defensive'. When Mourinho does it though, what is being said? People are brainwashed by the fecking media.
Except it was. Plenty of times. But SAF had earned a bit more leeway than Mourinho.
Let's just agree to disagree then. Majority for me means most of. Half of the game is not most of. Clear cut chances meas something else to me. Let's move on shall we?
It was NEVER described as negative. That's a fecking lie.
It was NEVER described as negative. That's a fecking lie.
He did not. If we played for the point, he would have set us out to have ten men behind the ball. They would not have had near as many chances. Look at when we brought on Zlatan and Rashford, both of them and Lukaku did not defend as they should. That meant we only had 7 men behind the ball.
If we had played for the draw, we would have drawn.
Young players such Lukaku, Rashford, Pogba, Martial and Lingard, all of whom are under 25?
There werent two or three chances, we created 5 or 6 clear cut chances.
I agree we were negative against Liverpool and, to some extent, Chelsea but always felt injuries hampered us. We were positive for majority of todays game.
Used up all the juice in the first half. There is nothing sustainable about this team.I'm all for a fun night of bashing Mourinho's negativity but I feel it's somewhat missing the point this time. We controlled the first half, had the ball, played the game mostly in their half and even had some chances.
That second half... I'm not sure what it was. What we were doing had only a fleeting resemblance to actual football. Calling it negative or defensive would imply that it was all part of some plan but it looked more like the team just happened to forget that it was a football game and not curling or something.
Young players such Lukaku, Rashford, Pogba, Martial and Lingard, all of whom are under 25?
There werent two or three chances, we created 5 or 6 clear cut chances.
I agree we were negative against Liverpool and, to some extent, Chelsea but always felt injuries hampered us. We were positive for majority of todays game.
When Fergie set up his team differently in CL, it was never described as 'negative' or 'defensive'. When Mourinho does it though, what is being said? People are brainwashed by the fecking media.
Perhaps he's looked at the other groups and thought he fancied 2nd place. Can we get second by the way?
When Fergie set up his team differently in CL, it was never described as 'negative' or 'defensive'. When Mourinho does it though, what is being said? People are brainwashed by the fecking media.
Remember how defensive we came out against Milan in 2010 in the first leg? Or how about Roma in the first leg in 2008? The idea that will always played defensively away under Ferguson is a complete myth.
Are you actually serious?? A shoulder-header from Fellaini and a Hail Mary from Rojo? We created roughly what WBA are expected to create against Chelsea away from home, and in the second half we had zero attempts. Absolutely nothing. 5 or 6 clear-cur chances - when did they happen and how come we didn’t score? I must have gone out of the room exactly 5-6 times during the game- because I sure as hell didn’t see them.
Lukaku 1v1.
Martial 1v1.
Lukaku header over the bar.
Fellaini goal line clearance.
Fellaini missed header (Martial hit the post).
All ranged from piss easy to good chances. But, lets just bash Mourinho and our negative play style, right?
I didn't watch the game last night but I definitely do have serious doubts about Ibra's return. Jose loves big, physical players and I can see him trying to shoehorn Ibra and Lukaku in at every opportunity to the detrimental, most likely , to players who, if developed well, I'd bank on to carry us to titles in the near future. If we do that then expect Rashford and Martial to hover around 'good' rather than exceptional, while we desperately chase instant success.Early days but I think the Ibrahimovic + Lukaku issue is going to feck us up tactically speaking. Don’t think the two can ever fit into one side and there’ll be a lot of tossing and turning in styles to try and do so. Main victim is almost certainly going to be Martial who really should be the one we make the team around
Against Swansea in the league cup last month.When was the last time we won an away game?
What a ridiculous agenda driven post. I suppose Mourinho is to be blamed for our players having an off day in front of the goal in the first half. It was a calculated risk of picking an understrength team, knowing our position in the group. There was nothing negative about the play and the approach. And under LVG, we would have passed the ball aimlessly between defenders, created one chance, and still conceded at the end.You can have chances for 90 minutes but what actually counts is the ball in the net, not hitting the post or anywhere else. Not good enough and yes, it looked like we havent moved on from LVG. Not good enough and negative play and approach from the start.
I didn't watch the game last night but I definitely do have serious doubts about Ibra's return. Jose loves big, physical players and I can see him trying to shoehorn Ibra and Lukaku in at every opportunity to the detrimental, most likely , to players who, if developed well, I'd bank on to carry us to titles in the near future. If we do that then expect Rashford and Martial to hover around 'good' rather than exceptional, while we desperately chase instant success.
As you say it is early days and it may work. But I have my doubts.
Geez, your posts are so obnoxious. Is your tongue that far up the Mourinho's arse that you need to get so defensive at any criticism of him?We were so defensive away to CSKA this year as well weren't we. That's part of the point. Everything Mourinho does is apparently 'defensive'.