Jonny Evans | 2011/12 Performances

this is just silly. Nani was putting in match-winning performances and pundits still criticized him for being a diver instead of recognizing him for the performances he was putting in for United.

To be widely recognized, you have to get media coverage. However what the media covers is not the be all end all. If you as a United fan can tell Nani is making vital contributions to the team, then trust your eyes.

Paranoid bullshit.

Here is a media article describing Nani's transformation into a "key figure in United's pursuit of honours".

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...ome-greatest-player-in-the-world-2124976.html

Here's an article talking him up as Player of the Year

http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/new...o-Player-of-the-Year-award-article720022.html

Here's one from the Telegraph

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/sport/...nchester-uniteds-nani-the-player-of-the-year/

From the Mail

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...FA-Player-Year-shortlist-says-John-OShea.html

ESPN

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/s...es-out-on-pfa-player-of-the-year-list?cc=5739

Here's an article saying Nani's ommission from the Player of the Year shortlist is "baffling and farcical"

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/sport/...-the-year-shortlist-is-baffling-and-farcical/

Please cut this shit out. I don't know why people here are so fond of convincing themselves there are vendettas against our players.

The same goes for Evans. I don't need to read it in a news column or football article to know the value of Evans to United. Nor should any other United fan if they watch enough of our games. He's been great this season and his abilities make him better than a decent PL centreback.

This idea that you need to be widely recognized to be considered good is shite to me. When you see good performances, what other justification do you need to know you have a good player on your hands?

When Bale won the PFA player over Nani in 10/11 I believe, I think that sums up the bullshit of being widely recognized. Nani definitely had a better season than Bale but we all know who got more attention.

If he's been "great" why have we conceded so many goals? What is "better than decent" anyway? Is he the best in the League? World Class? Or just somewhat above average, able to get into most teams outside the best 6 in the country. If it's the latter I'd agree with you, if it's the first or the second you need to have a word with yourself.
 
Sigh kietotheworld, I said pundits. Pundits! Not journos.

So you're blaming Evans for the goals we've conceded? Rafael has had a great season. Or are you going to deny that because we've conceded so many goals?

I think you underrate Jonny. Let's leave it at that.
 
Sigh kietotheworld, I said pundits. Pundits! Not journos.

So you're blaming Evans for the goals we've conceded? Rafael has had a great season. Or are you going to deny that because we've conceded so many goals?

I think you underrate Jonny. Let's leave it at that.

Pundits criticise every player for diving, Bale is often criticised for his diving by pundits, so is Suarez, who is better this season than Nani has ever been. They need something to talk about in boring games and diving is a great thing to fill up the time. When he was scoring goals and making assists they talked about that.

I'm saying Evans is a big part of a very leaky defence. He's an above average Premier League defender, but he's never been among the best in the League unless he stood next to Vidic and Ferdinand in the queue for the cafeteria.
 
Aye that's fair mate. Next time don't put so much effort into a post that you could have condensed if you read what I said correctly.

What you said about pundits further enforces my point on being widely recognized. If you take it from the media view then that comes down to which articles you pay attention to as they fluctuate constantly.

However pundits stay consistent in their shite views and just regurgitate cliches. My issue points to when pundits overstated Bale's performances in 10/11 when Nani was in great form. Just felt he never got the credit he deserved from pundits despite his wonderful performances.

Again, i don't think you have to be widely recognized to be considered good or great.
 
Hopefully it will put people off sharing similar paranoias to you with regard to journalists rather than pundits. If they stay consistent with their views and regurgitate cliches then one would expect that after 18 months of good form for Nani, their views would persist for a very long time even with him not playing well or not playing at all.

You do have to be recognised to be considered good or great, being recognised great and considered great are basically the same thing. My argument was that if a player is clearly among the best in his position in the League then he will be recognised. If he's not recognised then it doesn't necessarily mean he's no good, it might be something that's been missed by a lot of people for some strange (as yet unexplained) reason and he might be a wonderful player, but you can't say he's clearly the best if a lot of people don't recognise it. If it's unrecognised then it can't be that clear.
 
It's amazing how basically our defence is now Evans + 1 other.

Who would have thought that years back?

How many games do we think Ferdinand and Vidic will actually play together? At the moment they're used in rotation.
 
It's amazing how basically our defence is now Evans + 1 other.

Who would have thought that years back?

How many games do we think Ferdinand and Vidic will actually play together? At the moment they're used in rotation.

It's Evans + 1 other because Ferdinand is 34 and has played in nearly all of our League fixtures this season, he probably needs a break, while Vidic is returning from a very serious injury and can't play every week. We'll see when Vidic gets back to full fitness if it's Evans + 1, at the moment it's very premature to say this.
 
I guess I agree on the comparative team strengths for the most part, then. The defence is definitely the big difference, but I put our problems with conceding goals this season more down to form than quality. I also cannot agree that Brown is more defensively solid than Rafael. Brown was only ever a support player, really, who looked better than he was on account of being in, at the time, the best defensive unit in the world. Rafael this season has been as good a defender as Brown ever was, and in the attacking sense it's like having a whole extra player on top of what Brown provided.

Don't agree about Carrick either. He's better now than he was then, without a doubt. Before, he simply had to let Scholes do what Scholes did. Nowadays, he's able to be our main man in midfield, and right now he's looking exceptional.

But overall, fair enough. I think the gulf is overestimated though, because this team has yet to really come together as it has the potential to. And Kagawa will be in our first team somewhere, as much as we have ever had a 'first team'. Probably in the 3 of a 4231 - Nani-Rooney-Kagawa - behind RVP.
 
Evans has been good this season, his passing and drives forward are tip top.

Yeah we've conceeded a fair few goals, but there's not many I can think of that were a direct result of incompetence from Evans, he's been solid. Looking at the top clubs in the England's first choice CB's I'd have Evans above a fair few of them, could be a bit of bias involved in that mind you.
 
If he's been "great" why have we conceded so many goals? What is "better than decent" anyway? Is he the best in the League? World Class? Or just somewhat above average, able to get into most teams outside the best 6 in the country. If it's the latter I'd agree with you, if it's the first or the second you need to have a word with yourself.

Teams inside the top 6 currently and Evans against the people who played centre-back most recently for them.

1) Manchester United - Evidently Evans can get into the United team.
2) Manchester City - Not as good as Kompany, I'd have him ahead of Lescott.
3) Spurs - Would walk in in-front of any of their centrebacks
4) Chelsea - As good as Cahill, better then Luiz.
5) Everton - Better than Heitinga, Close with Jagielka but I'd still have Evans.
6) Arsenal - Vermaelen & Koscielny, you having a laugh?

So when you say he would get in the teams outside the top six, where you implying that he wouldn't get in the teams inside the top 6, because if you where then that's evidently crap. IMO Evans would get into any of those teams ahead of at least one if not both of the centre-back partners.

Tell me, in your view who are the better centrebacks than Evans currently in the premier league? He's certainly currently among the best in the league.
 
Teams inside the top 6 currently and Evans against the people who played centre-back most recently for them.

1) Manchester United - Evidently Evans can get into the United team.
2) Manchester City - Not as good as Kompany, I'd have him ahead of Lescott.
3) Spurs - Would walk in in-front of any of their centrebacks
4) Chelsea - As good as Cahill, better then Luiz.
5) Everton - Better than Heitinga, Close with Jagielka but I'd still have Evans.
6) Arsenal - Vermaelen & Koscielny, you having a laugh?

So when you say he would get in the teams outside the top six, where you implying that he wouldn't get in the teams inside the top 6, because if you where then that's evidently crap. IMO Evans would get into any of those teams ahead of at least one if not both of the centre-back partners.

Tell me, in your view who are the better centrebacks than Evans currently in the premier league? He's certainly currently among the best in the league.

1) I don't think Evans can get in the United first team when everyone's fit.
2) He'd struggle to get a game ahead of Lescott
3) Spurs, fair enough, defence is by far their weakest areas
4) Ivanovic, Luiz, Terry and Cahill are all at least as good as him
5) I wouldn't consider Everton in the top 6 teams in the country. They've overachieved this season, I'd have Liverpool in there instead, and Skrtel and Agger are both as good or better than Evans
6) Koscielny is a really good defender, and Mertesacker and Vermaelen are both good defenders. He certainly wouldn't be nailed on to start

Centre backs better than Evans in the Premier League?

Smalling, Ferdinand, Vidic, Kompany, Cahill, Terry, Ivanovic, Skrtel, Agger, Koscielny, Vermaelen, Shawcross.

That puts him comfortably in the top 15 centre backs in the country, which I'd say is about right for his level of ability.
 
Without giving it any thought at all I do think he's much closer to being our version of Gary Cahill than he is to being one of the best defenders in the league, but then again he's better than Cahill in every way and the defending's as bad as I can remember it right across the league. It's probably as bad as it's been in Europe for a long time actually because you instinctively look to Italy for the great defensive sides and there's pretty much no-one except Juve. I'm not even sure Bonucci's much better than Evans either, for example. Arsenal's duo make mistakes constantly and if Evans made half as many he'd be absolutely slaughtered on here. Cahill and Ivanovic are just decent, Jagielka's decent but Distin and Heitinga are so average...there's really not many better than him. Agger, Kompany and probably Jagielka are the only ones I'd say are obviously better outside our team. Even in our team I'd have Rio as being directly culpable for more of our goals than Evans and I've still no idea where Vidic is at.
 
In the PL only Ferdinand, Vidic, Kompany and Ivanovic are currently better CHs than Evans and he is still years from his peak. In the last 6 months he has taken his game to the next level and there is still more to come from him. By far the best back-up centre half in the league, so much so that he may not even be just a back-up anymore. Now Vidic is back a dip in form from Rio could see him lose his place to Johnny as first choice.
 
Centre backs better than Evans in the Premier League?

Smalling, Ferdinand, Vidic, Kompany, Cahill, Terry, Ivanovic, Skrtel, Agger, Koscielny, Vermaelen, Shawcross.

That puts him comfortably in the top 15 centre backs in the country, which I'd say is about right for his level of ability.

Don't know where to begin with so will just say it's mostly bollocks.
 
1) I don't think Evans can get in the United first team when everyone's fit.
2) He'd struggle to get a game ahead of Lescott
3) Spurs, fair enough, defence is by far their weakest areas
4) Ivanovic, Luiz, Terry and Cahill are all at least as good as him
5) I wouldn't consider Everton in the top 6 teams in the country. They've overachieved this season, I'd have Liverpool in there instead, and Skrtel and Agger are both as good or better than Evans
6) Koscielny is a really good defender, and Mertesacker and Vermaelen are both good defenders. He certainly wouldn't be nailed on to start

Centre backs better than Evans in the Premier League?

Smalling, Ferdinand, Vidic, Kompany, Cahill, Terry, Ivanovic, Skrtel, Agger, Koscielny, Vermaelen, Shawcross.

That puts him comfortably in the top 15 centre backs in the country, which I'd say is about right for his level of ability.

You're underrating him. I know it's a crime on here to rate a young player over an older legend, but Evans has been better this season than Ferdinand. More solid defensively, and with an attacking vigour to his game that we haven't seen in our CBs since Ferdinand was much, much younger.

And the CBs that you choose to rate above him from other teams suggests that you haven't actually watched that much of them. Koscielny is indeed brilliant, and would get in ahead of Evans. But Vermaelen has been having a terrible season. My little gaggle of Arsenal supporting mates are actually losing patience with him, and he's been like this for two seasons now. As for Mertesacker, he's never been better than average. A tall, slow guy who's ok as long as he only ever has to stand in the penalty area, basically.

Luiz? Nope, sorry. Cahill's on a par with Evans, but Luiz is a disaster area in defence. Lescott, likewise, is reasonably solid defensively, but no more so than Jonny. Meanwhile, he brings absolutely nothing to balance Evans' attacking contribution. Only one goal, and he's very poor on the ball.

For me, Irwinwastheking overrates him slightly, but by less than you underrate him.
 
Teams inside the top 6 currently and Evans against the people who played centre-back most recently for them.

1) Manchester United - Evidently Evans can get into the United team.
2) Manchester City - Not as good as Kompany, I'd have him ahead of Lescott.
3) Spurs - Would walk in in-front of any of their centrebacks
4) Chelsea - As good as Cahill, better then Luiz.
5) Everton - Better than Heitinga, Close with Jagielka but I'd still have Evans.
6) Arsenal - Vermaelen & Koscielny, you having a laugh?

Pretty much nailed it.
 
Hopefully it will put people off sharing similar paranoias to you with regard to journalists rather than pundits. If they stay consistent with their views and regurgitate cliches then one would expect that after 18 months of good form for Nani, their views would persist for a very long time even with him not playing well or not playing at all.

You do have to be recognised to be considered good or great, being recognised great and considered great are basically the same thing. My argument was that if a player is clearly among the best in his position in the League then he will be recognised. If he's not recognised then it doesn't necessarily mean he's no good, it might be something that's been missed by a lot of people for some strange (as yet unexplained) reason and he might be a wonderful player, but you can't say he's clearly the best if a lot of people don't recognise it. If it's unrecognised then it can't be that clear.

Then this is where we'll differ. I think a great player is a great player on their own merits. Being recognised or considered great comes secondary to that imo.
 
1) I don't think Evans can get in the United first team when everyone's fit.
2) He'd struggle to get a game ahead of Lescott
3) Spurs, fair enough, defence is by far their weakest areas
4) Ivanovic, Luiz, Terry and Cahill are all at least as good as him
5) I wouldn't consider Everton in the top 6 teams in the country. They've overachieved this season, I'd have Liverpool in there instead, and Skrtel and Agger are both as good or better than Evans
6) Koscielny is a really good defender, and Mertesacker and Vermaelen are both good defenders. He certainly wouldn't be nailed on to start

Centre backs better than Evans in the Premier League?

Smalling, Ferdinand, Vidic, Kompany, Cahill, Terry, Ivanovic, Skrtel, Agger, Koscielny, Vermaelen, Shawcross.

That puts him comfortably in the top 15 centre backs in the country, which I'd say is about right for his level of ability.

If you currently think Smalling is better than Evans you need your head seen to mate. There's a reason that Evans is playing every game and Smalling is a bit part player. That is unless you know more than Fergie. Smalling may well develop into a better player, but he isn't one now.

You we're having a pop at those above you for having their own view on things and now you claim that the Leage table is wrong. Everton are currently a better team than Liverpool, but regardless of that he's clearly a much much better player than Skrtel.

He's a better player than Lescott, but that's my view and they are the League champions and the richest cub ever so not getting in there is no shame.

He's playing week in week out at United. That is the facts, not opinion or otherwise. Until he's displaced by Smalling, Rio or Vidic then he's in the starting 11. That was the initial question.

Ivanovic is being played as a fullback so he's not relevent., Luiz is not a better centreback than him. Terry is finished and Cahill is debateable.

Of course he's be nailed on to start at Arsenal. Their defense is a shambles and has been for years.


Now to your list of players who are better than him;

Smalling - Not a chance is he better than him yet.
Ferdinand - in his prime no doubt, but now it looks increasingly like Evans is first choice. The next few months will be telling.
Vidic - OK
Kompany - OK
Cahill - Close, but I don't think so.
Terry - Not any more
Ivanovic - playing full back so not really that important
Skrtel - this is a joke yeah??
Agger - Don't think so, but close
Koscielny - Nope
Vermaelen - Nope
Shawcross - Nope - possibly a stronger defender, but Evans pisses on him in the other aspects of his game.

So that puts him comfortably in the top 5 in the country which is great for a lad still at the beginning of his first team career.
 
He's been at United for a long time now and has played plenty of time and even took part of that clean sheet run.He's steadily improved as a player as he has been maturing, Evans is comfortably better than the average PL defender.
If he was as bad as you were saying kieto, I honestly don't think SAF wouldn't have bought a senior CB a couple of seasons back (when the duo Rio-Vida was starting to break up for injury reasons mainly).
I don't need medias, pundits or fecking journos to tell me when I see a quality player and when I don't.
 
Kie has basically shown how blind he is to Evans by that list he produced of players better than Evans. Pretty much rules him out of any grown up talk in this thread as far as I'm concerned.
 
Koscielny's brilliant? He's been caught out playing offside in pretty much every single game I've seen of him this season. No doubt it's not easy playing in a disorganised defence but it's pretty much always him and no-one else in their team who makes the same basic mistake over and over again. He's always the last one to step up/react. I like him, he's certainly talented, but I genuinely think Evans would look as good as he does. They're very similar in style.
 
Adding Vermaelen in that list pretty much tells me he hasn't watched him play at all and is just going on by reputations. Ditto with Cahill.
 
1) I don't think Evans can get in the United first team when everyone's fit.
2) He'd struggle to get a game ahead of Lescott
3) Spurs, fair enough, defence is by far their weakest areas
4) Ivanovic, Luiz, Terry and Cahill are all at least as good as him
5) I wouldn't consider Everton in the top 6 teams in the country. They've overachieved this season, I'd have Liverpool in there instead, and Skrtel and Agger are both as good or better than Evans
6) Koscielny is a really good defender, and Mertesacker and Vermaelen are both good defenders. He certainly wouldn't be nailed on to start

Centre backs better than Evans in the Premier League?

Smalling, Ferdinand, Vidic, Kompany, Cahill, Terry, Ivanovic, Skrtel, Agger, Koscielny, Vermaelen, Shawcross.

That puts him comfortably in the top 15 centre backs in the country, which I'd say is about right for his level of ability.

Oh you fool :lol:
 
Just seen he has put David Luiz ahead of him. Well done.
 
Evans is a very good defender but he will never be as good as Rio or Vidic, he don't have the potential. He don't have any big weakness and as long we are in control he's a very reliable defender but put him under pressure and he's all over place. Jonny isn't a natural leader, he lack the authority to lead our lines. When he plays against big strong intelligent forwards he looks weak, he also have problems with his positioning, far to many times have lost his guy and put his team mates in problems.

Jonny Evans will be our first choice until Vidic is fit or we buy a new partner to Smalling.
 
You're underrating him. I know it's a crime on here to rate a young player over an older legend, but Evans has been better this season than Ferdinand. More solid defensively, and with an attacking vigour to his game that we haven't seen in our CBs since Ferdinand was much, much younger.

And the CBs that you choose to rate above him from other teams suggests that you haven't actually watched that much of them. Koscielny is indeed brilliant, and would get in ahead of Evans. But Vermaelen has been having a terrible season. My little gaggle of Arsenal supporting mates are actually losing patience with him, and he's been like this for two seasons now. As for Mertesacker, he's never been better than average. A tall, slow guy who's ok as long as he only ever has to stand in the penalty area, basically.

Luiz? Nope, sorry. Cahill's on a par with Evans, but Luiz is a disaster area in defence. Lescott, likewise, is reasonably solid defensively, but no more so than Jonny. Meanwhile, he brings absolutely nothing to balance Evans' attacking contribution. Only one goal, and he's very poor on the ball.

For me, Irwinwastheking overrates him slightly, but by less than you underrate him.

Can't agree with you on Rio, his reading of the game is still top notch and he's still got a lot of pace for his age. If it comes down to it I don't think we'll see Ferdinand on the bench for Evans for a big match when they're both fit for a while yet.

Vermaelen's not been great this season, in fact I don't think he's ever been great, I've always thought he's been a bit overhyped because of his goalscoring but he's still a good defender. It's no slight on Evans to say he's a bit better than him. Mertesacker offers something different to Evans, Evans is more talented but Mertesacker is physically better, I don't think there's that much between them.

Luiz fecks up a bit (not as much as his reputation suggests BTW), but he's still a good defender, look at him for Chelsea in the Champions League last season. Lescott is about the same as Evans, if they were at the same club they'd probably compete by rotated.

Then this is where we'll differ. I think a great player is a great player on their own merits. Being recognised or considered great comes secondary to that imo.
We're not differing, I agree with all of that, a player is better on his own merits, but if a player is clearly better then it must by definition be clear to people that he is better. If he's not recognised then it's not clear.
If you currently think Smalling is better than Evans you need your head seen to mate. There's a reason that Evans is playing every game and Smalling is a bit part player. That is unless you know more than Fergie. Smalling may well develop into a better player, but he isn't one now.

You we're having a pop at those above you for having their own view on things and now you claim that the Leage table is wrong. Everton are currently a better team than Liverpool, but regardless of that he's clearly a much much better player than Skrtel.

He's a better player than Lescott, but that's my view and they are the League champions and the richest cub ever so not getting in there is no shame.

He's playing week in week out at United. That is the facts, not opinion or otherwise. Until he's displaced by Smalling, Rio or Vidic then he's in the starting 11. That was the initial question.

Ivanovic is being played as a fullback so he's not relevent., Luiz is not a better centreback than him. Terry is finished and Cahill is debateable.

Of course he's be nailed on to start at Arsenal. Their defense is a shambles and has been for years.

There are a couple of reasons Evans pays every game and Smalling is a bit part player, Smalling is more dynamic than Evans, he can be deployed in other areas, Evans can't, Evans also has been fit a lot more and has had time to develop partnerships with Ferdinand and with the goalkeepers, and hasn't done much to deserve getting dropped. It'd be harsh to drop him out for a player who isn't senior when he hasn't done much wrong.

The League table is wrong, unless you're one of these people who thinks that West Brom are better than Liverpool and Everton are better than Arsenal. Skrtel is a good defender, I don't know what you have against him.

Them being Champions and the richest club is irrelevant, we're talking about competition between players.

He's in the starting 11 at United chiefly because of injuries, not talent.

Ivanovic has been played at centre back lately because of injuries and suspensions (much like Evans), Luiz I've already addressed, he's a very different player to Evans but not necessarily a worse one, Terry is well past his best but he's still go it, and Cahill is an impressive defender who is improving all the time, just as much if not moreso than Evans.

Our defence is an omnishambles this year.

Now to your list of players who are better than him;

Smalling - Not a chance is he better than him yet.
Ferdinand - in his prime no doubt, but now it looks increasingly like Evans is first choice. The next few months will be telling.
Vidic - OK
Kompany - OK
Cahill - Close, but I don't think so.
Terry - Not any more
Ivanovic - playing full back so not really that important
Skrtel - this is a joke yeah??
Agger - Don't think so, but close
Koscielny - Nope
Vermaelen - Nope
Shawcross - Nope - possibly a stronger defender, but Evans pisses on him in the other aspects of his game.

So that puts him comfortably in the top 5 in the country which is great for a lad still at the beginning of his first team career.

So there are two who are definitely better than him, one who might be depending on the next few months, one who you've ignore because he's playing at full back (even though he isn't), and two who are close to him, yet he's comfortably in the top 5 in the country? I think you're being a bit too kind to him even by your own methodology, if all that were accurate it'd still be debateable whether he's there.

He's been at United for a long time now and has played plenty of time and even took part of that clean sheet run.He's steadily improved as a player as he has been maturing, Evans is comfortably better than the average PL defender.
If he was as bad as you were saying kieto, I honestly don't think SAF wouldn't have bought a senior CB a couple of seasons back (when the duo Rio-Vida was starting to break up for injury reasons mainly).
I don't need medias, pundits or fecking journos to tell me when I see a quality player and when I don't.

I'm not saying he's a bad player, at all, I think he's a pretty good one, but he's never going to be at the level of Ferdinand or Vidic at their best. I imagine Ferguson hasn't bought a senior CB because he's already got Ferdinand and Vidic and he's counting on Jones and Smalling to be the future of the club. Evans is a sort of stop gap, he has improved though.
Just seen he has put David Luiz ahead of him. Well done.
Inaccurate.
 
A childhood United fan.
Moved country for a shot at United.
Made it through the ranks after successful loans spells.
Went on to be a part of defence that held the record for consecutive cleansheets after just making the break through.
Showed excellent determination and mental strength to come back from a poor run of form and getting so much stick from fans.
Fantastic attitude and ability to read the game. One of the best defenders to play the ball out from back.
Continuously improves himself. Notice the Vidic like threat that he provides in attacking set pieces these days ? Has cut down the silly fouls that he used to give away during that bad run. His concentration is improving. He has even started to run like a sprinter !

All this with best of his footballing years still in front of him.

His ability to marshal the defence will start to show as he becomes a main stay in defence. I can still remember his ability to marshal that defence of Nosworthy, Simpson and Ward won him a lot of praise from Sunderland fans. If you ask me it's quite unfair to expect him to show that authority to probably two of best defenders in the world but with time that will come through.

What he doesn't have though is a fancy name.
 
Tooni, someone was critisiing him in this very thread for showing leadership and having a go at DDG after a mistake. That's the level of stupidity we're seeing here.
 
A childhood United fan.
Moved country for a shot at United.
Made it through the ranks after successful loans spells.
Went on to be a part of defence that held the record for consecutive cleansheets after just making the break through.
Showed excellent determination and mental strength to come back from a poor run of form and getting so much stick from fans.
Fantastic attitude and ability to read the game. One of the best defenders to play the ball out from back.
Continuously improves himself. Notice the Vidic like threat that he provides in attacking set pieces these days ? Has cut down the silly fouls that he used to give away during that bad run. His concentration is improving. He has even started to run like a sprinter !

All this with best of his footballing years still in front of him.

His ability to marshal the defence will start to show as he becomes a main stay in defence. I can still remember his ability to marshal that defence of Nosworthy, Simpson and Ward won him a lot of praise from Sunderland fans. If you ask me it's quite unfair to expect him to show that authority to probably two of best defenders in the world but with time that will come through.

What he doesn't have though is a fancy name.

You're right, I'm all about fancy names like Shawcross, Terry, Cahill and Smalling. :wenger:
 
You're right, I'm all about fancy names like Shawcross, Terry, Cahill and Smalling. :wenger:

Wait, are you saying those 4 are better defenders than Evans ?

Cahill is the only debatable one there. I am a big fan of Smalling's potential but that's what it is for now. If Chelsea play Terry and we play Hernandez I'll show you what a cricket score looks like. Shawcross ? :lol: This surely is a joke.
 
I got some flak when I suggested Evans would be a starter for most clubs around the world a month or two back. I still hold the same opinion, his performance this season so far is as good as any other defender in the world right now.
 
I got some flak when I suggested Evans would be a starter for most clubs around the world a month or two back. I still hold the same opinion, his performance this season so far is as good as any other defender in the world right now.

Of course he'd be a starter for most clubs in the world, he's in the Manchester United squad.
 
I got some flak when I suggested Evans would be a starter for most clubs around the world a month or two back. I still hold the same opinion, his performance this season so far is as good as any other defender in the world right now.

:eek:

really......My god he isnt not that good.
 
Of course he'd be a starter for most clubs in the world, he's in the Manchester United squad.

and that means feck all by the way, there are and has been plenty of players in the United squad that wouldnt get a game at "most clubs" as you lads put it.

Just becasue you are at United doesnt make you a shoe in at other clubs....especially bigger clubs.
 
and that means feck all by the way, there are and has been plenty of players in the United squad that wouldnt get a game at "most clubs" as you lads put it.

Just becasue you are at United doesnt make you a shoe in at other clubs....especially bigger clubs.


Of course it does, most clubs in the world play in lower divisions in countries far inferior to England in footballing terms. Unless it's qualified with something like "Most CL Clubs" or "Most clubs in the world's top Leagues" then it's completely meaningless praise.
 
Of course it does, most clubs in the world play in lower divisions in countries far inferior to England in footballing terms. Unless it's qualified with something like "Most CL Clubs" or "Most clubs in the world's top Leagues" then it's completely meaningless praise.

yep!