Minimalist
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2013
- Messages
- 15,091
No.Liverpool should go for him. Serious upgrade on Mignolet
They.Have.Klopp.
He.Bought.Karius.
No.Liverpool should go for him. Serious upgrade on Mignolet
Hart.Wasnt.Available.Then.No.
They.Have.Klopp.
He.Bought.Karius.
Why do Everton want him? Stekelenberg is decent...
The English media have hardly bothered with the Bastian stories after the initial hysteria.Does anyone else think the amount of bad media attention we've received over schwein vs Hart is unfair?
You've got a top brass at city coming out with statements saying it's best he leaves, as well as pep. We've kept our mouth shut yet seem to be coming out worse than city.
He was though, it's been a pretty open secret that Hart was out the door for most of 2016.Hart.Wasnt.Available.Then.
Both managers are winners. You need to be decisive at the top level.I think the Hart situation is similar to the Schweinsteiger at United. Now I don't think that Hart is a top keeper but he is better than Caballero who was absolute garbage on the ball yesterday for City. Pep isn't even giving Hart a shot to prove himself and Soriano has basically told him to leave the club. It is the same with Schweinsteiger at United, told to leave without even being given a chance. I'm sure BS could do a job for us in the Euro and League Cup this season and his personality could be good for the dressing room. It is seems to me that both Pep and Mou are making power plays and establishing their authority on their new clubs. Not that I think Hart or Schweinsteiger have a future at either club but they could both be given a chance to fail at least.
Thats true I guess. It's more you had a number of papers bashing out stories, Bayern chief getting his nose stuck in and in all the papers shouting about how players won't want to come to United if they treat players like this, then city do the same and I see no article from the same journos saying the same about city.The English media have hardly bothered with the Bastian stories after the initial hysteria.
Hart is pictured countless times in every City game frowning.Don't think it's been that bad.
The simple truth is that United are simply a bigger attraction for journalists.Thats true I guess. It's more you had a number of papers bashing out stories, Bayern chief getting his nose stuck in and in all the papers shouting about how players won't want to come to United if they treat players like this, then city do the same and I see no article from the same journos saying the same about city.
Not sure if I'd say De Gea is better than him to be honest.biteHe is kind of done as a top keeper in a CL team - Every other team has a keeper thats better or as good as him. Damn, that must be hard to take for him...
are you comparing Joe Hart vs ddg and saying you're not sure if ddg is better than joe? If so, I'd call 999 now mate as you've obviously knocked yourself out bad somehowNot sure if I'd say De Gea is better than him to be honest.bite
White text should be banned!!!!Not sure if I'd say De Gea is better than him to be honest.bite
He is kind of done as a top keeper in a CL team - Every other team has a keeper thats better or as good as him. Damn, that must be hard to take for him...
Bravo is a decent at best keeper. Other than his ball playing he isn't better than hart at all.
Apart from winning two Copa Americas, a pair of La Liga's, a CL, a bunch of other domestic and international cups, what has Bravo got on Joe?
You missed the white text, you've been hadare you comparing Joe Hart vs ddg and saying you're not sure if ddg is better than joe? If so, I'd call 999 now mate as you've obviously knocked yourself out bad somehow
Ha ha h aYou missed the white text, you've been had
I've always thought he was below the top level of keepers, gets too easy a go from the media and he makes too many mistakes, but he's being weirdly underrated now, due to nothing more than Pep not fancying him due to his very specific criteria of what a goalkeeper should be. Plus he'll likely improve his decision making as he gets older. If Everton, for example, could buy him at a half decent price they could get a real bargain.
I've always thought he was below the top level of keepers, gets too easy a go from the media and he makes too many mistakes, but he's being weirdly underrated now, due to nothing more than Pep not fancying him due to his very specific criteria of what a goalkeeper should be. Plus he'll likely improve his decision making as he gets older. If Everton, for example, could buy him at a half decent price they could get a real bargain.
White text should be banned!!!!
He was never a good keeper. He reminds me of a poor man's Sebastiano Rossi who rode over the success of others (or OShea/Phil Neville)
He's only 29 so he'll make the move back up in a couple of years. Courtois, de Gea, Cech and Lloris are all better but Cech's going to retire and at least one of the others will move. Wouldn't be surprised to see him go abroad to a CL team because I can't see him accepting West Ham as his level and nowhere else is suitable. He's certainly better than a number of CL keepers.
Bingo.Never rated him. Another england player who's built a career on his public image rather than his performances.
There is not really a number of homegrown players that are required - they cannot have more than 17 overseas players in their 25 man squad. There was a Chelsea squad a few years back that only had 5 / 6 homegrown players and it meant that there was only 22 / 23 players in their squad.I'm surprised city are getting rid
Not much in the way of homegrown players in their squad
Gunn (3rd keeper)
Stones
Delph
Stirling
Ihenecho (not sure he qualifies yet?)
Does de bruyne count?
And shouldn't they have eight?
http://www.epfl-europeanleagues.com/quota_for_Premier_League.htm
Yeah he is better than de gea by that logic
Disagree. He's the new Paul Robinson but with a better PR team and hair products.I think the general theme of this thread is because we're United fans and he plays for City. He's a very good goalkeeper. He's made a few mistakes in 10 fecking years, but he's also had several ridiculous one-man barricade performances.
Bravo may be a better #10 than him, but I'd be surprised if he was much better at keeping the ball out of the net, unless we're working on the premise that he himself will not make any mistakes during his City career.
Disagree. He's the new Paul Robinson but with a better PR team and hair products.