Some strange responses in here. People who don’t rate Jesse are using arguments based on his lack of consistency, poor output stats, the fact that he has had many many opportunities and failed to take them and the fact that we have other players that should be given opportunities before him. All reasonable and cognisant grounds on which to base arguement. If nothing else, these are valid points that must come into any discussion about Jesse Lingard. If they didn’t, it’s not really a discussion is it?...it’s a celebration of Jesse Lingard...is that what this thread is? Surely not...surely we are allowed have a reasoned discussion on genuine concerns that almost every fan of Man Utd must have had at some point in his career. The revisionism here is mental!
I remember everyone bar no one on this site being outraged a few years back by him getting game time and consistently losing the ball, being unable to control it in tight spaces or pass 5 yards and his complete lack of goals or assists - the universal barometer for any attacking player. Also, the endless jokes about him being considered a “young” player that needed time to mature...Lingard has been given much more consideration and time than any other player in the squad...poor Dan James was shafted as soon as he stopped scoring for doing exactly what everyone knew Dan James- a Championship player would do and was capable of doing! did I really read an earlier post comparing Lingard to Ji Sung Park? Sweet Jesus! And even worse saying that Lingards best traits were his intricate passing and movement against low blocks???? There is no use being intelligent and making intelligent runs when you don’t have the ability to recieve the ball in tight spaces and use it (Newcastle goal was a nice finish but I’m talking about him as a player generally)despite his movement he never had any end product, never beat his man, never played that killer pass as evidenced again by his assists stats or even the pass before the assist. He was not so much a bad player for Utd as he was completely anonymous and ineffective. His position was seen as being a number 10 and just look at what happened when we bought a proper one of those! Did I also read someone argue that he was effective against a low block - by scoring two goals....against Andorra??? Fuking Andorra? We are supposed to be one of the top 10 Clubs in the world...I should bloody hope one of our first team players could perform well against Andorra. It’s preposterous! Stop taking criticism of the lad personally and engage with the arguements being made.
For example....Why was he so much better for West Ham? My argument...It’s a team that plays completely and utterly different to Utd. his lack of creativity and technical ability in tight spaces is exposed for 75% of Utds season where they come up against low blocks. At West Ham, they play on the break...Jesus....look at his goals and assists for them...fast counter attacks. He is quick thinking and somewhat pacey and can finish...so with time and space he delivers. When his G/A dried up, it was at the end of the season when teams stopped simply allowing him the space he was being given previously. Also, as he revealed himself, he has struggled mentally lately and so it could be argued pretty reasonably that the pressure at a club like Utd to perform consistently is too much for him...hence his better performances for a team with much lesser expectations and spotlight. So I say, kick Lingard and give is minutes to Amad or DVB or Mata...and let’s get some imagination and intricacy into our attacking when the bus has been parked. That’s not me having an agenda...that’s a fairly reasonable conclusion to draw
I don’t mind Lingard...good on him for battling through his issues....and being loyal And loving the club...but on a purely football basis, I get why some people might see him as a bench option but don’t get why those same people take reasoned arguement against him being a bench option as slander and having an agenda.