- Joined
- Apr 21, 2013
- Messages
- 650
Feck him, he can go and pop his beans somewhere else and stink out the place.
It’s genuinely odd. With all the news being released, you’d think that prime Ronaldo was leaving not some overpaid benchwarmer.The amount of press coverage this is getting is so weird. I don't understand why his PR team are working so hard. It's actually hurting his image if anything.
Sad the way cnuts on this site have turned on him, not the ones that were always against him, the others that have just gone along with the current narrative. I'm so close to just dropping this site...
Bye Afro. Beans beans beansSad the way cnuts on this site have turned on him, not the ones that were always against him, the others that have just gone along with the current narrative. I'm so close to just dropping this site...
Incredibly unfair to lump those players in together. Some have FAR more serious issues than others.
It happens everywhere, we just focus on it because it happens at our favorite club.
Young players get a million Instagram followers before their first official game, girls throwing themselves at them, earning shitload of money and are adored by millions. You have to be a well-balanced guy to not let that get to you. They live in a bubble, in a fairy tale world, very far from reality.
Lingard is a good player.
How his situation was handled is a reflection of how things have been done at the club.
He was given false promises.
Two windows and he was not sold.
I wish him well.
The less stroppy adolescents we have in this squad the better.
He's been doing this sort of shit for years.
I remember when he was on that run of over a year without a goal or assist and playing like utter dogshit. Then we beat Spurs and City one after the other and Lingard played ok in both games, he wasn't great and he didn't score or assist anything but he was at least competent in both games.
First thing he did was go out and do a big PR tour giving interviews about how he'd had personal issues but he was over them now and he was back to "the old Jesse" and he was ready to go on a great run of form and blah blah blah.
Next game was against Everton I believe and he was absolutely fecking atrocious, and it ended up taking him I think another 4 or 5 months to score or assist.
So all this is only a reflection on the club but not him?
Its funny how you say false promises, but this is Manutd, no player is guaranteed certain amount of playing time. If you play well, more chance you play, its that simple.
Also, its very naive of you and Lingard to talk about false promises, in his time at the club, he has never nailed down a starting spot, he went 1 year without a goal and assist whilst being played. All of a sudden Ole told him he will get game time, he thinks what he will be a starter? On what basis.
West Ham offered a crappy sum and signed a player for £25m in Vlasic, so clearly they didn't want him that badly.
He then also chose to stay because okay he got false promises but that was not the only reason, West Ham not being able to offer him the salary, Ronaldo coming back and he wanted to play with him and Sancho at the club, for Lingard it was vibes.
Come January window, the club said they won't sell him to West Ham because they are fighting top 4 with United, he didnt want to go to Newcastle on a permanent because they were in a relegation battle, he wanted a loan.
Why would a club send a player on loan with 6 months left? when they loaned Martial and Greenwood moved mad.
Then he twerks for West Ham on his Insta whilst playing for Manutd, his brother says he is imprisonment at United whilst he is on a 5 star holiday in Dubai.
When he was given chances this season, he took none of them.
But yeah the club treated him badly. What about the disrespect he has?
Then his brother decides to talk about the Glazers and the board? Where was he when we were protesting?
I know banking his 100k a week wage.
He did well at West Ham.
Why not sell a player we did not want, for whatever they offered in the summer?
The key is we had an idiot manager who did not know what he was doing.
Rightly.We get one last chance in Jan to flog him for some cash to Newcastle…..we reject it
Shrewd move by the club..Rightly.
He would only accept a loan, the club wanted to sell him outright.
I mean he could have gone to West Ham and said you need to up the bid, players do this when they want to leave.
Its all well and good blaming Ole but if West Ham are going to offer £8m and you say £15m, then its their loss if they dont want him.
I mean the manager you call "idiot" got us 2nd place so clearly he wasnt as clueless as you make it out.
Just underlines how shockingly bad the decisions at the top have been.
After his spell at West Ham his stock was sky high. Could've easily have gotten £20m-£40m. But no, we decided to see out his contact, costing £xm, and then allow him to leave for free.
They've done the exact same thing with Pogba.
It's bizarre. I mean, I understand that the people making the decisions aren't football people, but this was purely a business decision. Do these people have a brain?
West Ham wanted him and he would have gone. The final amount is all a matter of negotiation.
As to Ole being give a 3 year contract for finishing 2nd is the idiocy of Woodward.
How we went out of the CL and lost the UEFA Final were red flags.
The way the new season unraveled confirmed how unprepared Ole was. Without going into his moral bankruptcy of not resigning after been humiliated 5-0 by our bitter rivals.
. Best that he's leaving anyway because I have heard that ETH doesn't give youth players much of a chance.Bet Ten Hag is fecking gutted Lingard won’t take his calls…
He needs to cash in on the leaks he provides them.He’s had about 10 different British journalists doing PR for him over the last couple of weeks.
The less stroppy adolescents we have in this squad the better.
none of them is fit to play with United and these are the finest of the lot.
Clearly West Ham didn't think he was worth the money. They spend £25m on Vlasic but couldn't spend £15m on Lingard, also they couldn't afford his wages, which is why when he was on loan we paid part of the wages.
When a club wants a player, they pay the money, Liverpool with VVD, United with numerous players, Chelsea, the list goes on and on.
Anyway, he is not a very professional player with no respect anyway.
Yes, Ole must have given himself a 3 year deal.
That was Woodward's philosophy right. Social media engagement numbers dictated player buys and salaries.If social media PR bullshit was what we paid players for
Clearly West Ham didn't think he was worth the money. They spend £25m on Vlasic but couldn't spend £15m on Lingard, also they couldn't afford his wages, which is why when he was on loan we paid part of the wages.
When a club wants a player, they pay the money, Liverpool with VVD, United with numerous players, Chelsea, the list goes on and on.
Anyway, he is not a very professional player with no respect anyway.
Yes, Ole must have given himself a 3 year deal.
I think most posters are doing the same. Just not spelling it out here. People just want Lingard gone and not wishing that his career gets trashed.Maybe I'm sentimental but I always wish a player luck when they leave UTD
Why do you say things that arent true?
West Ham pursued a purchase of Lingard but were rebuffed by Manchester United who put out a £30m valuation. West Ham never put in an official bid as the asking price was too high. If you are about to say that £15m would get the job done, that is a fan guess and not something real that actually happened.
West Ham is a small club. For them to fork out Uniteds asking price for a player with 1 year left on his contract is just not going to happen. Jesse is 29 and West Ham have ever only signed 3 players above £30m, with the highest transfer fee ever being Sébastien Haller in 19/20 for £45m, who immediately bombed and was sold to Ajax at a 40% loss. All high price signings were around 25-26, most other in their early 20s and only when you get down to £16m you will find a 29 year old Chicarito that was signed 5 years ago.
Jesses contract term, age and buyer profile of West Ham makes it abundantly clear that they were never going to pay £30m for him, so why the feck is that being used against him?
Not directed at OP: I cant stand how absolute toxic and eager to revise history into something its not a lot of you have become. This season has made you all bitter and frankly, shit. You should all be significantly better people than this but it appears too much to ask.
Why do you say things that arent true?
West Ham pursued a purchase of Lingard but were rebuffed by Manchester United who put out a £30m valuation. West Ham never put in an official bid as the asking price was too high. If you are about to say that £15m would get the job done, that is a fan guess and not something real that actually happened.
West Ham is a small club. For them to fork out Uniteds asking price for a player with 1 year left on his contract is just not going to happen. Jesse is 29 and West Ham have ever only signed 3 players above £30m, with the highest transfer fee ever being Sébastien Haller in 19/20 for £45m, who immediately bombed and was sold to Ajax at a 40% loss. All high price signings were around 25-26, most other in their early 20s and only when you get down to £16m you will find a 29 year old Chicarito that was signed 5 years ago.
Jesses contract term, age and buyer profile of West Ham makes it abundantly clear that they were never going to pay £30m for him, so why the feck is that being used against him?
Not directed at OP: I cant stand how absolute toxic and eager to revise history into something its not a lot of you have become. This season has made you all bitter and frankly, shit. You should all be significantly better people than this but it appears too much to ask.
What are you on about?
We have established Lingard was not wanted. It was a matter of negotiation to get rid of an unwanted player. But Ole saw what he did at West Ham and persuaded him to stay.
I did not blame Ole for the contract. That is Woodward's doing.
But Ole should have resigned after us being humiliated At Home by Liverpool, if he actually loved the club as he claimed.
The severance could have been negotiated.
Instead we had to wait until being humiliated at Watford who are now relegated.
The fact is the club should have fired him after that Liverpool defeat even if he had not resigned.
Well here we are.
Right. I do recall Fergie resigning after losing 6-1 to Man City.
I recall Ralf resigning after losing 4-0 and 4-1 to Liverpool and City.