stevoc
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2011
- Messages
- 22,689
Do you mean while dribbling? Because again, he turns the ball over less than one time per 90 minutes via dribbling.
Or do you mean in the air? Because if you mean in the air, then I agree, this is a huge weakness. He is arguably the worst player in our regular squad in the air.
If neither, could you please clarify?
Not necessarily while dribbling mate no, yes quote a lot in the air. But just in general when i watch him if we're on the counter or building an attack whenever the ball is played to Lingard he quite often gets beaten to it by the fullback and/or just gets tackled and loses possession as soon he does receive it.
This ties into my opinion that he's not really suited to playing on the wing.
Is the way we are measuring productivity solely based on goals and assists? Because, from an attacking midfield wing, I think there is a lot more they are asked to do. If we are talking about a wing in the 433, then I agree, Lingard is a very poor fit. But he is good in a 4231, excels in a 352, and I'd imagine he'd be solid in a 442.
Also, I do desire a more creative wing player that will improve our attack. Further, I'd imagine that player would cut into Lingard's minutes pretty heavily. That's totally fine by me. I'm not some blind Lingard supporter. I just think that, outside of maybe Rashford and Mata, there is an argument to play him in front of our other options. Not always, but in many situations, he is the best bet for what Jose wants to do each match.
At a club like Manchester United basically yes, Lingard has good attributes that are useful to any team. His infamous off the ball movement, his workrate tracking back etc. But those are things that should be the default bare minimum expected of a winger at United. But on top of that they have to be chipping in with goals themselves or creating goals for others at a decent rate. I just don't see how a team that has problems scoring goals and wants to be challenging for league titles can afford to have a player in a prominent attacking position who rarely scores or assists. 8 goals and assists combined just isn't enough to warrant starting around half of our games as he did last season.
The WhoScored rating is a statistical regression based on aspects of team performance with how the player played on the pitch, and how the same team looked with a replacement-level player in their place. It's pretty solid, imo. Not a perfect analysis, of course, but it does point to general production. The problem is that you do not see exactly what causes that performance. So it is important to take with a grain of salt.
So what happens when someone like me, who also has watched a lot of football (albeit not in person, just saw my first live ManUtd match on Wednesday!), comes along with a different analysis from the eye test? How do we evaluate? I am not saying stats are the ultimate measuring stick, as I hope it is clear, I have been using stats to substantiate what I see with my own eyes. But, I also do not think we should shun stats completely, as they seem to be a fairly impartial measuring tool when used correctly.
It's a simple difference of opinion mate. Stats are stats sometimes they are useful, sometimes they are not. For instance if a player like Lingard is not able to take possession of a ball that is played to him theres really no stat for that. Lots of stats are useless, others are misinterpreted or taken out of context.
Thats why i always form my opinion of players on what i actually see. If we sign a new player like Depay his stats were great but i reserved judgement on him until i had seen him play over a season. I've now watched Lingard over a number of years first in the reserves and now in the first team over the last 2-3 years and what i see is a player who is not a winger and certainly not on the right. In the youth and reserve teams Lingard always looked better playing in the centre or from the left. Thats was where he played the majority of his games, before Van Gaal's 2nd season Lingard had only ever player 5-10 games on the right.