Glad he didn't go to Chelsea but what a sideways step for him.
His main motivation is money.There is nothing attractive about playing for PSG other than the money right now (and possibly living in the great Paris).
He could played at a better level if he stayed or joined other clubs but he chose the easiest way in terms of being guaranteed first team football and earning lots of money.That and the fact Palermo also wanted him to sign for PSG who were more willing than Chelsea to pay what was required.
French league football is underrated and will only get better.
Yeah, it definitely seems that way.
I'm a bit saddened by the downfall of the Serie A. They look like they could be on their way of becoming the fifth best league in Europe from being the bar none best league in the world just 10 years ago.
Sideways? He's moved from a team who finished 8th to a team who finished 4th, from a team who are in nothing to a team in the Europa league, and from a selling club to a club that are potential league winners.
I'm baffled that people find this move strange.
PSG is a club with great history, newly found wealth, situated in Paris and plays in the 5th strongest league in the world. According to UEFA they are more close to Italy in strength than Italy is to Germany.
He's going to be their main man. He left a particulary small club sided in mob center and will get better wages. What's not to get? Did he turn down offers from any other clubs? No because no else bidded as far as we know, at least didn't get one accepted.
I really don't think that is the case, and neither is Serie A as poor as has been suggested in this thread so far. I'd be interested to know how much Italian football some on here actually watch. Roma, Napoli, Juventus and a couple of other clubs are re-emerging and have shown some real ambition in this transfer window while teams like Udinese, Fiorentina etc have also shown themselves to be challengers for the top 4. The two Milan clubs are very strong ofcourse.
There's a lot to be excited about in this coming Serie A season, so I don't understand the negativity. Calciopoli was always going to have a severe adverse effect on Italian football so it understandably has taken time for Serie A to recover.
A great history? The club is only 40 years old ffs. Your goalie last season was the same age as them!
Real Madrid, Barcelona, Liverpool, Manchester United. Those clubs have a great history. PSG are a very young team who have won their domestic league only twice. They are certainly going places but come on!
I watch a fair amount of Italian football on ESPN, or to be honest as much as I can handle without turning over.
I used to love Italian football in the glory days of Gullit, Rijkard, Van Basten and the great Milan side which dominated. Boban and Savecevic were particular favourites - and then Veron, Nedved, Crespo, Vieri and Salas.
Now, to be perfectly frank, most games I see are fairly boring.
Most of the worlds best players played in Serie A at some point in the 80's and 90's but thats no longer the case, the PL and La Liga being (for me) streets ahead in terms of entertainment.
The standard appears lower - performances in the CL highlighting this, with Jose's miracle at Inter the obvious exception. The Italian national side also no longer has teh lustre it once did - half the players I've never heard of.
Clubs over there seem to be trying to drag themsleves back into contention but I often find transfers strange - buying unknown players from various clubs for often huge sums in complex co-ownership or loan deals - all just seems a bit fishy to me. Never mind the bubbling under current of corruption which never seems to die.
Won the cup 8 times. So their average is better than all those teams mentioned.
They were founded by two merged teams, went as fast up to the top as you can and have never been relegated. Was voted the team of the year in 94 and have had many of the greatest players who have played in France play for them in the past decade.
By your definition of great history there are only a few teams and no one else to be considered to have a great one.
Does Notts County have a great history?
Glad he didn't go to Chelsea but what a sideways step for him.
Well, yes. I do think only a few teams can claim to have a great history.
Christ, it's thrown in my face here enough that Chelsea have "no history" and we have won more than PSG and have been around for a hell of a lot longer.
And I would not say Notts county have a great history no. They have a long history, not a great one.
Disagree with almost all of that, also feel there is a strong sense of contradiction in saying that you watch 'a fair amount' and yet you haven't heard of 'half the players' in the national side. But it is down to opinions what someone finds boring and what someone doesn't.
Fair enough.
In terms of not having heard of players, perhaps I should clarify - the point I was making was that in the past they had stand out players in most positions - some of the worlds best and that's no longer the case.
I guess it just doesn't compare to what I used to watch years ago - but you're right, its down to personal opinion.
I really don't think that is the case, and neither is Serie A as poor as has been suggested in this thread so far. I'd be interested to know how much Italian football some on here actually watch. Roma, Napoli, Juventus and a couple of other clubs are re-emerging and have shown some real ambition in this transfer window while teams like Udinese, Fiorentina etc have also shown themselves to be challengers for the top 4. The two Milan clubs are very strong ofcourse.
There's a lot to be excited about in this coming Serie A season, so I don't understand the negativity. Calciopoli was always going to have a severe adverse effect on Italian football so it understandably has taken time for Serie A to recover.