KM
I’m afraid I just blue myself
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2008
- Messages
- 49,917
According to SkySports Italia, going to PSG for 45 Mil Euros. What the feck?
If true then, no Modric and no Pastore.Sky Italia saying he's going to PSG.
What a maroon.
If true then, no Modric and no Pastore.
So onwards to Plan C for Chel$ki ... Taarabt perhaps?
It might as well be, because Chelsea's hopes for Modric were dead in the water right from the off.Why no Modric?
It's not September yet, is it?
If true then, no Modric and no Pastore.
So onwards to Plan C for Chel$ki ... Taarabt perhaps?
It might as well be, because Chelsea's hopes for Modric were dead in the water right from the off.
I imagine that even you may be starting to realise this now. There have been zero indications that Levy will change his stance, Modric has meekly knuckled down for pre-season and it's all been rather quiet on the Chelsea-Modric front for some time now.
Besides, would Chelsea have switched to pursuing Pastore if they hadn't more or less given up?
feck.
So Chelsea are looking to sign Pastore instead of Modric?
No reason to think they arent in for both. Spoke about signing at least 2 players
Zamparini has told Italian Media that Chelsea has upped their bid and Pastore's agent is coming to london tomorrow.
I highly doubt they are going to spend around £75-80 million again six months after they spent £75m. They will be keeping an eye on the UEFA FFP.
I dont know if they'll get both Pastore or Modric, but I do think they'll be spending those kinds of numbers again
I highly doubt they are going to spend around £75-80 million again six months after they spent £75m. They will be keeping an eye on the UEFA FFP.
Ugh, City get Aguero and now Chelsea could get Pastore? This saddens me
I highly doubt they are going to spend around £75-80 million again six months after they spent £75m. They will be keeping an eye on the UEFA FFP.
Why?
Abramomivich will spend what he thinks he needs to regardless of anything else.
City seem to have circumvented the FFP regs so Chelsea wont be far behind, besides, I recent realised something which I'd seemingly ignored in the vain hope that the regs would bring Chelsea and City into line - the basic fact that UEFA will not throw out Chelsea, City or any other side with world class players - they're exactly why the CL is of such a high standard.
I have no real opinion on how this will work as yet, so i am neither agreeing or disagreeing with your claim at this time.
But if (hypothetically of course) UEFA will not as you suggest, throw out the likes of Chelsea and City on the basis of potentially breaching FFP regulations. That would then surely exempt any other 'elite' club from receiving punishment.
If we then speculate that the most likely contenders to breach FFP regulations would have to be considered to be the 'elite' clubs, who exactly are the FFP regulations supposed to regulate?
As a sidenote, UEFA rarely take the action of expulsion in anything other than extremely serious offences such as match fixing etc. The most likely scenario would be offending clubs will receive a hefty fine and a warning to come more into line with the new regulations asap.
Boosting UEFA's coffers without potentially damaging the CL would seem the most satisfactory, least controversial and legally uncomplicated stance for the powers that be to take. Whether that proves to be the case or not, only time will tell.
"Pastore's transfer is imminent. It's a matter of minutes," Micciche told Radio Kiss Kiss.
"We want to close the deal, but it must be both sides who sign the contract.
"There are no doubts PSG are interested in Pastore. People from the club's ownership have intervened and they want to take a top player to Paris."
Il Corriere dello Sport claims Pastore has agreed to sign a contract with the French side worth around £3.9 million (€4.5m) per annum. The transfer fee is said to be around €42m (£36.7m).
I have no real opinion on how this will work as yet, so i am neither agreeing or disagreeing with your claim at this time.
But if (hypothetically of course) UEFA will not as you suggest, throw out the likes of Chelsea and City on the basis of potentially breaching FFP regulations. That would then surely exempt any other 'elite' club from receiving punishment.
If we then speculate that the most likely contenders to breach FFP regulations would have to be considered to be the 'elite' clubs, who exactly are the FFP regulations supposed to regulate?
As a sidenote, UEFA rarely take the action of expulsion in anything other than extremely serious offences such as match fixing etc. The most likely scenario would be offending clubs will receive a hefty fine and a warning to come more into line with the new regulations asap.
Boosting UEFA's coffers without potentially damaging the CL would seem the most satisfactory, least controversial and legally uncomplicated stance for the powers that be to take. Whether that proves to be the case or not, only time will tell.
Why?
Abramomivich will spend what he thinks he needs to regardless of anything else.
City seem to have circumvented the FFP regs so Chelsea wont be far behind, besides, I recent realised something which I'd seemingly ignored in the vain hope that the regs would bring Chelsea and City into line - the basic fact that UEFA will not throw out Chelsea, City or any other side with world class players - they're exactly why the CL is of such a high standard.