peterstorey
Still not banned
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2002
- Messages
- 37,291
It's a pretty dim argument, Phil Neville got more trophies than Bryan RobsonRVP:
Honours: 2001 - UEFA CUP, 2005 - FA Cup
That was my point Compare that with Fillipo.
It's a pretty dim argument, Phil Neville got more trophies than Bryan RobsonRVP:
Honours: 2001 - UEFA CUP, 2005 - FA Cup
That was my point Compare that with Fillipo.
I'm not torn, the amount of points, especially away from home that Hernandez wins us means he's first choice, and rightly so, goals win football matches and Hernandez is full of them.
Wellbeck has only had a couple of games with this brilliant all round play you speak of, and it usually comes after scoring a goal to raise his confidence, he's also had a good few games where his touch is off and he offers nothing (Sunderland at home for example), when Hernandez touch is off he still offers you that threat.
I don't think it's quite the no brainer you think it is and the managers selections so far this season would suggest this also. Welbecks pretty much started when fit this season.
It's a pretty dim argument, Phil Neville got more trophies than Bryan Robson
Well, that's another poor argument, Inzaghi's Serie A record for Milan is only about 1 in 3 while being a passenger (or impediment with his offsides) if he didn't score.This wasn't really the argument though, the argument was, goals are invaluable and Arsenal really would have won more trophies a few years back with a player like Inzaghi.
Well, that's another poor argument, Inzaghi's record for Milan is only about 1 in 3 while being a passenger (or impediment with his offsides) if he didn't score.
Arsenal have never had a problem scoring goals (not that that's got anything to do with the merits of the players under discussion like the 'trophy' argument and your other red herrings).
Well that's incorrect isn't it, Wellbeck started the season because Hernandez was injured.
What about the Liverpool and City match. He wasn't injured then when Welbeck started ahead of him.
Well that's because he was in decent form, obviously. He had the chance to get into good form because of Hernadez injury.
That was only after Welbeck had returned from being a month out
Arsenal never had any problems with scoring goals. Before Van Persie, Adebayor, Arshavin, Fabregas etc all shared the scoring burden effectively. It's their goalkeeper and defence which has been the problem besides I'm not sure if a player like Hernandez will fit in Arsenal's style of play.
You need to check the goals scored column for the last 10 league seasons rather than get carried away by listening to Chris Waddle. As I was saying this isn't anything to do with Arsenal...
I must have imaged all those games where every single viewer, commentator, pundit watched Arsenal create chance after chance and dominate without putting the ball in the net. That cost you plenty of points.
When discussing Arsenal you really aren't worthwhile storey.
It doesn't change my point.
You need to check the goals scored column for the last 10 league seasons rather than get carried away by listening to Chris Waddle. As I was saying this isn't anything to do with Arsenal...
First things first- i do love Hernandez. I was amazed with what did last season. But the more i watch him the more he frustrates me. I see that he is -in fact- a limted player. He is a lethal poacher, but goes invisble in many games. His link-up play, passing, first touch is ok but nothing more. He doesnt dribble past his markers, he doesnt shoot from distance and yet he scores and provides points. I never been a fan of Welbeck until this season. Imo he offers more to our build up than Hernandez, tries to beat his man in many ways thus is less predictable than our lovely Mexican. I do hope that both learn from each other-as combining them intoone player would give us a top top player. The way i see it - Danny boy should start games to tire the defense and then we should unleash Hernadez who could use his pace ans killer instinct.
First things first- i do love Hernandez. I was amazed with what did last season. But the more i watch him the more he frustrates me. I see that he is -in fact- a limted player. He is a lethal poacher, but goes invisble in many games. His link-up play, passing, first touch is ok but nothing more. He doesnt dribble past his markers, he doesnt shoot from distance and yet he scores and provides points. I never been a fan of Welbeck until this season. Imo he offers more to our build up than Hernandez, tries to beat his man in many ways thus is less predictable than our lovely Mexican. I do hope that both learn from each other-as combining them intoone player would give us a top top player. The way i see it - Danny boy should start games to tire the defense and then we should unleash Hernadez who could use his pace ans killer instinct.
Arsenal never had any problems with scoring goals. Before Van Persie, Adebayor, Arshavin, Fabregas etc all shared the scoring burden effectively. It's their goalkeeper and defence which has been the problem besides I'm not sure if a player like Hernandez will fit in Arsenal's style of play.
Well why appeal to this sort of idiot for justification? Whatever your perception of games the facts are we score plenty of goals. Of course, this has nothing to do with Hernandez.Nothing to do with Chris Waddle or John Hartson, it's to do with me watching games, especially home games and thinking, feck me these feckers play great stuff but don't put the ball in the back of the net. This led to many a dropped point. If you can't remember this problem yourself you're bonkers.
Well why appeal to this sort of idiot for justification? Whatever your perception of games the facts are we score plenty of goals. Of course, this has nothing to do with Hernandez.
Well that's incorrect isn't it, Wellbeck started the season because Hernandez was injured.
Sounds a bit like a horse-faced player I used to hate (who just so happened to be an absolutely incredible striker)...
Yesterday's performance certainly won't have.
Horse faced? How Ruud of you! ()
I think Chicharito's limits as a player are overstated. Admittedly I like him but I am not blind to his fault. He is not O Fenomeno Ronaldo or the kind of striker who seems to be able to do it all but by the same token he is not some kind of goal poaching carthorse either.
I think his play with his back to goal is actually quite good for a little man and he seems to win a fair percentage of aerial balls against big defenders. I've seen him win more than a few knock downs to Rooney since he became a first XI striker. Plus, the ball does stick to him more than it used to and he wins us a fair amount of free kicks as a result e.g. vs Galati away. Every so often he pulls a great pass out of the bag e.g. vs Everton away to Welbeck which shows the player he might be with time and more confidence.
He's a young guy still getting used to the Premier League after 2 years ago coming close to quitting football cos he couldn't get into the Chivas team. Lets give the guy a break, eh? His development from that point has already been exponential. I've no doubt he'll get even better.
The point is that playing with a front five + a passenger means you don't create many chances - see Man Utd yesterday.J ... it doesn't change the fact that before RVP turned superhuman an Inzaghi would've done a cracking job for you.
The point is that playing with a front five + a passenger means you don't create many chances - see Man Utd yesterday.
Horse faced? How Ruud of you! ()
I think Chicharito's limits as a player are overstated. Admittedly I like him but I am not blind to his fault. He is not O Fenomeno Ronaldo or the kind of striker who seems to be able to do it all but by the same token he is not some kind of goal poaching carthorse either.
I think his play with his back to goal is actually quite good for a little man and he seems to win a fair percentage of aerial balls against big defenders. I've seen him win more than a few knock downs to Rooney since he became a first XI striker. Plus, the ball does stick to him more than it used to and he wins us a fair amount of free kicks as a result e.g. vs Galati away. Every so often he pulls a great pass out of the bag e.g. vs Everton away to Welbeck which shows the player he might be with time and more confidence.
He's a young guy still getting used to the Premier League after 2 years ago coming close to quitting football cos he couldn't get into the Chivas team. Lets give the guy a break, eh? His development from that point has already been exponential. I've no doubt he'll get even better.
It didn't help that a few times when we did actually play some good stuff, it broke down as soon as Hernandez got the ball.Hernandez wasn't the problem yesterday, our wingers were. (our attacking mid Giggs also had a very off game, the only time he did something decent, Hernandez was there to win the game.)
Well why appeal to this sort of idiot for justification? Whatever your perception of games the facts are we score plenty of goals. Of course, this has nothing to do with Hernandez.
Actually RvP scores a lot of goals. He's scored 13 goals in the league, your other 3 strikers / forwards have scored 4 in total (Walcott with 2, and Mopheads got 2 as well).
So, basically Arsenal is chugging along because RvP hasn't broken down yet and he's having the streak of his life. I expect it to end soon though. Everyone knows once winter sets in Arsenal start to fade. The gloves come out and your lot shrivel up to the challenge.
He's scored 13 of our 18 PL goals away from home since he's joined and that has resulted in 8 wins, a draw and a loss. I don't care how limited he is if he continues to win us so many matches.
What the feck
What do people expect.