I think we're watching a brain entirely bred on twitter and the interweb in action here.
I think we're watching a brain entirely bred on twitter and the interweb in action here.
I think we're watching a brain entirely bred on twitter and the interweb in action here.
YOUR WIFE FOUND MY DICK HARSH TOO HAHAHAThat joke is a little harsh, but if it's ok with you, then so be it.
That joke is a little harsh, but if it's ok with you, then so be it.
Cringe monster. Saying Kate Abdo isn’t loyal to her fiancé on live tv. Look at Richard’s reaction.
Is he trying to reference the "flirting" with Henry or is he literally just saying she's cheated on her partner?
It comes across terribly either way.
Is he not suggesting her partner supports another club?
The most charitable interpretation I've come across is that he means "Not to Malik?" as a question rather than "Not to Malik!" as a definitive statement. Like he questions her putting her loyalty to a club over loyalty to her boyfiend. It would still be weird, but not quite as bad. But I don't think that's what it sounds like.
Come on. We are not talking about illegal stuff here.What? That's an absolute insane line of thinking?
So if Carragher thinks a racist joke is okay then so be it? We all have to go along with it?
Not exactly that. But they have been joking about a lot other things.I'm not sure how much of them you have been watching but this has never been part of the banter.
Come on. We are not talking about illegal stuff here.
I just googled and her partner appears to be an American boxer, so I'm going out on a limb and saying he likely doesn't have any strong loyalty to any Premier League club.
But we are talking about things that are disciplinary worthy. Potentially even sackable. It’s not just a bit of banter, he has straight up accused his coworker of infidelity live on television. You don’t see the problem with this?Come on. We are not talking about illegal stuff here.
Agree. I have no idea why people would be upset with what Carragher said when this kind of conversation and language are used pretty much all the time by them.
That is how they have been talking to eachother pretty much all the time. Give and take. I would say Richards have been the one who have been on recieving side most. Who are we to tell where red line is for what is ok or not if you consider how they have been talking to eachother?
That is not for us to decide. If they talk to eachother like that in the studio why should we decide. She was surprised by that comment from Carragher but we know they have been joking a lot in their show.
She did react very surprised. Just laugh it off and go on and say something back. Like they have been doing previously.
Maybe it is for Carragher. People react differently to different things and have different humour.
That is up to her. Just answer with some funny comment back. What is inappropriate for someone don't need to be for another. If Carragher thinks it is ok with those jokes so be it. Like I said, they have been joking around every time they were on tv. For example Richards have been taking it and laughing it off every time they were at him.
Is this satire / a character you’re playing or are these serious posts?Come on. We are not talking about illegal stuff here.
Not exactly that. But they have been joking about a lot other things.
Emblematic of your mediocrity during that period that Carragher lasted as long as he did in the Liverpool team. Should've been booted out years before.He's too used to people around him lifting him up as a footballing oracle. Loved his tenacity and attitude on the pitch, I thought he was very underrated at the time. Since then, I think that he's an absolute prat and can imagine that a lot of his teammates probably wanted to knock seven bells out of him.
These posts are brought to you by the same chap who considers McTominay to be as good as/better than Declan Rice.Is this satire / a character you’re playing or are these serious posts?
Jose nails it.
It is not nonsens saying that he made a joke. Something they've been doing previously.Who knows since you're posting absolute nonsense.
We don't know that. It is those in charge who makes them calls. As I said, they have been joking with eachother every time on that show. Wheather he went over line or not is their channel to decide. I don't see this as a big deal.But we are talking about things that are disciplinary worthy. Potentially even sackable. It’s not just a bit of banter, he has straight up accused his coworker of infidelity live on television. You don’t see the problem with this?
There are milions of thing worse than someone making a joke and banter.Is this satire / a character you’re playing or are these serious posts?
Time to close this website then.
Carragher was a better defender than any of us and yet we talk about how to win the league. Jamie Carragher was also a better player than Mourinho was.
How good someone was at football doesnt mean anything about how much that person knows about football. Paul Scholes comes to mind as an example for that. World class player, worst pundit.
That joke is a little harsh, but if it's ok with you, then so be it.
So by this logic you can never be offended?Maybe it is for Carragher. People react differently to different things and have different humour.
That is up to her. Just answer with some funny comment back. What is inappropriate for someone don't need to be for another. If Carragher thinks it is ok with those jokes so be it. Like I said, they have been joking around every time they were on tv. For example Richards have been taking it and laughing it off every time they were at him.
He should be exiledNeeds to be made an example of
Name them.There are milions of thing worse than someone making a joke and banter.
When you go for a wee and you put your knob away and then a little bit of wee drips out onto your underwearName them.
Name them.
Jose nails it.
Banter isn't unilateral, you get this yes?Maybe it is for Carragher. People react differently to different things and have different humour.
I'm sorry what?He's an idiot, I'd imagine some truth in it and may involve one of his co pundits, you just don't do that though. I wouldn't be surprised if other pundits told their bosses they aren't happy with him, there is a banter line and he's gone pretty much as far as you can over it.
Kind of besides the point, the analogy with the forum is a silly one. No one is being paid or is doing this as their job. It's fine to call someone out who is actually being remunerated for this (even though that quote seems dubious)Time to close this website then.
Carragher was a better defender than any of us and yet we talk about how to win the league. Jamie Carragher was also a better player than Mourinho was.
How good someone was at football doesnt mean anything about how much that person knows about football. Paul Scholes comes to mind as an example for that. World class player, worst pundit.