CallyRed
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2009
- Messages
- 12,419
Top bants
Happy if you could share one example of this level of idiocy.Agree. I have no idea why people would be upset with what Carragher said when this kind of conversation and language are used pretty much all the time by them.
Doubt it. They say stupid things all the time.Going to get fired for that and no-one will miss that odious twat.
Of course not. Just Carragher thinking he's funny.Is Kate cheating on her man? Why would Carragher say that otherwise? Very disappointing from her. She seemed cool.
Not convinced that's racist to be fair.Going to get fired for that and no-one will miss that odious twat.
It's obviously made a co-worker VERY uncomfortable and is pushing past the boundaries of workplace 'banter'. They say and do silly stuff all the time but this is straight up zero filter stupidity from Carragher. Off with his head.Not convinced that's racist to be fair.
Bit weird you go straight to blaming her before realising Carragher was thinking he was a top lad and would get more laughs then had an awkward panic when he noticed he didn't. He's the type of bloke to call someone gay in the pub for wearing a pink shirt then gets grumpy when nobody laughs.Is Kate cheating on her man? Why would Carragher say that otherwise? Very disappointing from her. She seemed cool.
Of course not. Just Carragher thinking he's funny.
Agree. I have no idea why people would be upset with what Carragher said when this kind of conversation and language are used pretty much all the time by them.
There's banter and then there's calling someone an adulterer on live tv as a joke. If you can't see the line there's a problem.Agree. I have no idea why people would be upset with what Carragher said when this kind of conversation and language are used pretty much all the time by them.
Happy if you could share one example of this level of idiocy.
That is how they have been talking to eachother pretty much all the time. Give and take. I would say Richards have been the one who have been on recieving side most. Who are we to tell where red line is for what is ok or not if you consider how they have been talking to eachother?He basically insinuated she cheated on her fiance. That isn’t the normal banter and you can tell that from their expressions.
Agree. I have no idea why people would be upset with what Carragher said when this kind of conversation and language are used pretty much all the time by them.
That is how they have been talking to eachother pretty much all the time. Give and take. I would say Richards have been the one who have been on recieving side most. Who are we to tell where red line is for what is ok or not if you consider how they have been talking to eachother?
No it isn't. Do you not understand what Charrager said? That is not normal banter.That is how they have been talking to eachother pretty much all the time. Give and take. I would say Richards have been the one who have been on recieving side most. Who are we to tell where red line is for what is ok or not if you consider how they have been talking to eachother?
There's banter and then there's calling someone an adulterer on live tv as a joke. If you can't see the line there's a problem.
That is not for us to decide. If they talk to eachother like that in the studio why should we decide. She was surprised by that comment from Carragher but we know they have been joking a lot in their show.He crossed the line, you don’t say something like that on live TV.
Bizarre take. You don’t insinuate someone else is cheating on live TV, while having a football discussion. Just look at their reactions.
No it isn't. Do you not understand what Charrager said? That is not normal banter.
She reacted quite pissed off, Richards and Henry were visibly shocked and silenced by that line. It's clearly not banter.That is not for us to decide. If they talk to eachother like that in the studio why should we decide. She was surprised by that comment from Carragher but we know they have been joking a lot in their show.
She did react very surprised. Just laugh it off and go on and say something back. Like they have been doing previously.
She did react very surprised. Just laugh it off and go on and say something back. Like they have been doing previously.
Spot on. Richards’ reaction is telling. Even though this was on a US network it should also be a massive wake up call for Sky who fired Gray and Keys for derogatory comments about a female staff member that were leaked not on live coverage.He crossed the line, you don’t say something like that on live TV.
The hell you on about?She did react very surprised. Just laugh it off and go on and say something back. Like they have been doing previously.
Yeah, possibly to create as little fuss as possible about the whole thing. I imagine he's going to start getting sidelined pretty quickly now.Also it should go without saying but 'banter' isn't an excuse for inappropriate work place behaviour. He won't get sacked but sure he'll get a bollocking.
Seems to think cheating jokes on your colleague live on tv are fair game.The hell you on about?
Maybe it is for Carragher. People react differently to different things and have different humour.She reacted quite pissed off, Richards and Henry were visibly shocked and silenced by that line. It's clearly not banter.
Saying "that's not for us to decide" is a ridiculously daft argument. We are the audience, the product is for us. If we clip on to something that's deemed a red flag then they get in trouble. They can have all the banter with no lines behind the camera all they like, but in front of the camera there's certain things you just don't say
Besides, the video very clearly shows no one took that as banter.
That is up to her. Just answer with some funny comment back. What is inappropriate for someone don't need to be for another. If Carragher thinks it is ok with those jokes so be it. Like I said, they have been joking around every time they were on tv. For example Richards have been taking it and laughing it off every time they were at him.What should she reply back with? "Why don't you go spit on a child?" or "Well you also cheat on your missus, so there!".
It was an extremely inappropriate comment for Carragher to make. Don't see how anyone can disagree with that.
Maybe it is for Carragher. People react differently to different things and have different humour.
That is up to her. Just answer with some funny comment back. What is inappropriate for someone don't need to be for another. If Carragher thinks it is ok with those jokes so be it. Like I said, they have been joking around every time they were on tv. For example Richards have been taking it and laughing it off every time they were at him.
That is how they have been talking to eachother pretty much all the time. Give and take. I would say Richards have been the one who have been on recieving side most. Who are we to tell where red line is for what is ok or not if you consider how they have been talking to eachother?
Maybe it is for Carragher. People react differently to different things and have different humour.
That is up to her. Just answer with some funny comment back. What is inappropriate for someone don't need to be for another. If Carragher thinks it is ok with those jokes so be it. Like I said, they have been joking around every time they were on tv. For example Richards have been taking it and laughing it off every time they were at him.
I think we're watching a brain entirely bred on twitter and the interweb in action here.Maybe it is for Carragher. People react differently to different things and have different humour.
That is up to her. Just answer with some funny comment back. What is inappropriate for someone don't need to be for another. If Carragher thinks it is ok with those jokes so be it. Like I said, they have been joking around every time they were on tv. For example Richards have been taking it and laughing it off every time they were at him.