Cooksen
The Millennium Falcao
So we are getting another mata really.
I hope he can blog.
I hope he can blog.
Players that would want to prove they can play for Bayern, Real, Barca?Honestly, I dont think we should be going for Barca, Munich or Madrid players unless theyve said its their dream to play for us. I know they have good/great players, but if those clubs dont want them, there must be a reason.
We should be going for hungry players who could use the platform we can provide to turn them into better players who will defo improve our first 11 (players like Martial tbh).
You mean Couti-I keep trying ridiculous amount of long shots until I score one then suddenly I'm a world class player-nho?I prefer Coutinho.
Do you also think James is better than Iniesta?You mean Couti-I keep trying ridiculous amount of long shots until I score one then suddenly I'm a world class player-nho?
By the way,
No idea why people here all thinks that Isco is the better player when it's obviously the other way round.
- Isco 14/15: 53 Chances created | 4 Goals | 9 Assists
- Isco 15/present: 39 Chances created | 2 Goals | 7 Assists
- James 14/15: 77 Chances created | 13 Goals | 13 Assists
- James 15/present: 45 Chances created | 5 Goals | 6 Assists
Yes, James had a pretty mediocre season thus far, but he is still a very, very good player and easily better than any options that we have in our squad here. People seem to have short-term memories here, whenever a player is in a bad patch of form suddenly his performances (no matter how good) prior to that are completely forgotten.
Exactly.He's been demonized in the press in Madrid. I don't know how much of it to believe. Madrid do that sort of thing when they're about to sell a big player.
Teams could always use some guile.I'd rather we moved towards pacey, athletic players.
I'd rather we moved towards pacey, athletic players.
For the wide areas and at striker, yes, but to get the best out of a player like Rodriguez you play him through the middle. The added advantage is that he is stronger on the ball than Mata but the deal should be cut-price which I doubt Woodward would be able to seal.I'd rather we moved towards pacey, athletic players.
For the wide areas and at striker, yes, but to get the best out of a player like Rodriguez you play him through the middle. The added advantage is that he is stronger on the ball than Mata but the deal should be cut-price which I doubt Woodward would be able to seal.
For the wide areas and at striker, yes, but to get the best out of a player like Rodriguez you play him through the middle. The added advantage is that he is stronger on the ball than Mata but the deal should be cut-price which I doubt Woodward would be able to seal.
2016s di maria.
Just sign greizmann. Stop dicking about with real madrid rejects. Its boring.
To the stats: in how many games?You mean Couti-I keep trying ridiculous amount of long shots until I score one then suddenly I'm a world class player-nho?
By the way,
No idea why people here all thinks that Isco is the better player when it's obviously the other way round.
- Isco 14/15: 53 Chances created | 4 Goals | 9 Assists
- Isco 15/present: 39 Chances created | 2 Goals | 7 Assists
- James 14/15: 77 Chances created | 13 Goals | 13 Assists
- James 15/present: 45 Chances created | 5 Goals | 6 Assists
Yes, James had a pretty mediocre season thus far, but he is still a very, very good player and easily better than any options that we have in our squad here. People seem to have short-term memories here, whenever a player is in a bad patch of form suddenly his performances (no matter how good) prior to that are completely forgotten.
Sometimes you need to judge by what you can see not what the stats say. Isco is the more dynamic and technical player and plays a deeper role than James. James playes higher up and is more likely to deliver the final ballYou mean Couti-I keep trying ridiculous amount of long shots until I score one then suddenly I'm a world class player-nho?
By the way,
No idea why people here all thinks that Isco is the better player when it's obviously the other way round.
- Isco 14/15: 53 Chances created | 4 Goals | 9 Assists
- Isco 15/present: 39 Chances created | 2 Goals | 7 Assists
- James 14/15: 77 Chances created | 13 Goals | 13 Assists
- James 15/present: 45 Chances created | 5 Goals | 6 Assists
Yes, James had a pretty mediocre season thus far, but he is still a very, very good player and easily better than any options that we have in our squad here. People seem to have short-term memories here, whenever a player is in a bad patch of form suddenly his performances (no matter how good) prior to that are completely forgotten.
Different team, different tactics, different positions, not comparable at all.Do you also think James is better than Iniesta?
Isco:To the stats: in how many games?
I watch quite a bit of Real Madrid games and IMO Isco is the more consistent player while James is more capable of coming up with magical moments. Both had been playing well below their standards this season though, but I personally think that we need more match winners, someone that can pull something miraculous out of nothing.Sometimes you need to judge by what you can see not what the stats say. Isco is the more dynamic and technical player and plays a deeper role than James. James playes higher up and is more likely to deliver the final ball
IMO Isco is the more creative player. I'm sure James stats in terms of chances created, goals and assists are better than someone like Iniesta but we all would agree iniesta is the more creative player.
You mean Couti-I keep trying ridiculous amount of long shots until I score one then suddenly I'm a world class player-nho?
By the way,
No idea why people here all thinks that Isco is the better player when it's obviously the other way round.
- Isco 14/15: 53 Chances created | 4 Goals | 9 Assists
- Isco 15/present: 39 Chances created | 2 Goals | 7 Assists
- James 14/15: 77 Chances created | 13 Goals | 13 Assists
- James 15/present: 45 Chances created | 5 Goals | 6 Assists
Yes, James had a pretty mediocre season thus far, but he is still a very, very good player and easily better than any options that we have in our squad here. People seem to have short-term memories here, whenever a player is in a bad patch of form suddenly his performances (no matter how good) prior to that are completely forgotten.
People need to stop trying to compare him to Di Maria in this thread.
Di Maria is a much better player than James Rodgriguez.
Comes across as a grounded fella. I wouldn't put that on him.I think the golden boot at the WC and hype massively went to his head and thought he made it. I would much prefer Isco.
We already have Juan.Overrated in my opinion. Scores some nice long shots every once in a while but we require more in our team. We need someone who works hard and can get up and down the pitch. James is the luxury overpaid player we do not need.
At least Di Maria has just won the Champions League and was MOTM in that game. Rodriguez has just plain flopped.
Ross Barkley would be the better buy IMO. He has been very productive in the Premier League this year and we know that he can cope with the physical demands, can James? Ross is Scouse so won't even have to move house if he doesn't want to, no chance of him not settling.
Both go missing too often but come up with special moments. It is worth noting that Barkley has a couple more years of improvement on James, however.
Comes across as a grounded fella. I wouldn't put that on him.
We already have Juan.
Brilliant player but recouping the full 80M?
Errrrr no thanks.