amolbhatia50k
Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
I've seen too many people use Liverpool as a reference point. Their back 4 is excellent on the ball as is their front three with Firmino being better in the buildup than most CFs. So they get away with their midfield creativity due to the composition of their team, as well as Klopps tactics which is designed to create lots of chances.I don't think its a necessity, I hate to say this but look at Liverpool they don't have a genuine passer in midfield but have somehow fashioned an all conquering team with TAA being their best passer but playing RB. A midfield of McT, Mcginn and Maddison has more offensive threat than any midfield combination Liverpool could fashion from their options. I think with Maguire and Tuanzebe (I don't see Lindelof as a viable long term starter) we have two good passers from deep so they could compensate for not have a Carrick like figure whilst McT and Fred/McGinn would give us the energy and bite to impose our will on teams.
I don't see recreating this composition of team (our fullbacks are very different) not Klopp's tactics. So we have to use a more traditional team composition as a reference point. See City - mechanical fullbacks and extremely creative fullbacks.
As an example, put Liverpool's CMs in our team and I don't see them having all that big an impact. Put City's there and it would be transformative.