Jadon Sancho| Staying at Dortmund for now

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bastards probably wont to pocket the entire money, hence the delaying tactics. They can then tell their fans "big bad United didn't give us enough time to find a replacement!"

Prior to Aug,10 there were links to Depay. Also we had Favre bickering in german media about his squad being not big enough for the tasks ahead. They'd want at least another if not 2 signings if Sancho were to leave. They'd still be left with a nice amount even if they did that.
 
if we don't get him it's a PR disaster for the club
I'm not so worried about it being a PR disaster, however Ed won't like that, I agree in that sense.

I'm more concerned with having this hanging over us for pundits and papers to use as a stick to bash us with whenever we have a poor result.

On top of the existing problems we've had with the squad in this short off-season it will be just another negative issue to start the season with. Plus the most important thing is that, on the field, we feckin' need him.
 
if we don't get him it's a PR disaster for the club

How? He's going to be a club and British transfer record if he does leave and Dortmund clearly don't want to sell him.

It won't be the first time we don't get our main transfer target. It's happened dozens of times through the post Fergie era and during the Fergie era as well. It's happens a lot in fact.
 
How? He's going to be a club and British transfer record if he does leave and Dortmund clearly don't want to sell him.

It won't be the first time we don't get our main transfer target. It's happened dozens of times through the post Fergie era and during the Fergie era as well. It's happens a lot in fact.
I can't remember a time we didn't get a player who wanted to come to us, but we didn't want to pay the fee which is suited to his talent.

Probably Hazard, but that's it. Every other target we missed is down to the player not wanting to come to us.
 
I can't remember a time we didn't get a player who wanted to come to us, but we didn't want to pay the fee which is suited to his talent.

Probably Hazard, but that's it. Every other target we missed is down to the player not wanting to come to us.

Can you remember any of these years where the club had lost over £100m out of interest?
 
Can you remember any of these years where the club had lost over £100m out of interest?
Other clubs like Newcastle(with MIKE ASHLEY) and Everton are spending way more than their level dictates and they`ve lost money too. Zero excuses for a club that makes double if not triple the revenue of most mid table clubs not to get a Sancho level player no excuses
 
Still believe it will happen by this Friday. Also the fact that the club has not look on alternatives to him makes me more confident. Brooks is also likely heading to Leicester in the twitter thread
 
I can't remember a time we didn't get a player who wanted to come to us, but we didn't want to pay the fee which is suited to his talent.

Probably Hazard, but that's it. Every other target we missed is down to the player not wanting to come to us.
Hazard? Weren't we actively in for him and willing to pay up until he made that ridiculous twitter decision. I remember a bunch of us watched his final game too, for his previous club, as we thought he'd make the announcement there. The only thing he did was receive some kind of dog trophy.
 
Other clubs like Newcastle(with MIKE ASHLEY) and Everton are spending way more than their level dictates and they`ve lost money too. Zero excuses for a club that makes double if not triple the revenue of most mid table clubs not to get a Sancho level player no excuses

That will be why there's been an abundance of huge mega money transfers this window so far then.......wait there's barely been any has there? Maybe because your logic is totally flawed.
 
Hazard? Weren't we actively in for him and willing to pay up until he made that ridiculous twitter decision. I remember a bunch of us watched his final game too, for his previous club, as we thought he'd make the announcement there. The only thing he did was receive some kind of dog trophy.

It was his agent fees that was the stumbling block. Fergie didn't want to pay the 6M. Was an extremely poor decision on hindsight. Also don't think we will allow him to announce his transfer on his twittee if we had gotten him
 
Can you remember any of these years where the club had lost over £100m out of interest?
We made a financial loss of £100m? That's interesting - I thought our financial losses were £3m as of May.
 
How? He's going to be a club and British transfer record if he does leave and Dortmund clearly don't want to sell him.

It won't be the first time we don't get our main transfer target. It's happened dozens of times through the post Fergie era and during the Fergie era as well. It's happens a lot in fact.

They do though, they named their price
 
That will be why there's been an abundance of huge mega money transfers this window so far then.......wait there's barely been any has there? Maybe because your logic is totally flawed.
So lemme get this straight. You are happy for smaller clubs with vastly superior resources to us showing more intent in the transfer market than Manchester United who are one of the most valuable sport franchises in the world? Especially when it is very clear our team needs work? Our starting 11 has not yet been addressed the one player we`ve signed is a depth signing our weaknesses at LB, CB, DM and RW are still crystal clear for everyone to see. There`s clubs like Everton signing James Rodriguez but Utd shouldn`t be addressing the RW with one of the most talented youngsters in world football who IS AFFORDABLE for a club our size??!
 
I'm not so worried about it being a PR disaster, however Ed won't like that, I agree in that sense.

I'm more concerned with having this hanging over us for pundits and papers to use as a stick to bash us with whenever we have a poor result.

On top of the existing problems we've had with the squad in this short off-season it will be just another negative issue to start the season with. Plus the most important thing is that, on the field, we feckin' need him.
What you describe is a PR problem :lol:
 
Other clubs like Newcastle(with MIKE ASHLEY) and Everton are spending way more than their level dictates and they`ve lost money too. Zero excuses for a club that makes double if not triple the revenue of most mid table clubs not to get a Sancho level player no excuses
That will be why there's been an abundance of huge mega money transfers this window so far then.......wait there's barely been any has there? Maybe because your logic is totally flawed.

Looking at the figures so far, we still have 1 month of the transfer window to go and the net spend for the premier league clubs so far is £450m. Last summer it was around £650m. (Maguire and AWB was £130m of that)

Considering we still have a month left I’d imagine the net spend to not be far off last summer without covid.

I would say the market has certainly been a lot more active than most anticipated.
 
What you describe is a PR problem :lol:
Yeah what I said was I’m not worried about it being a PR problem, more in a sense of it having a negative impact on the team itself.

But, as mentioned, I’m sure Ed won’t like any negative press and he loves making a big signing.
 
Other clubs like Newcastle(with MIKE ASHLEY) and Everton are spending way more than their level dictates and they`ve lost money too. Zero excuses for a club that makes double if not triple the revenue of most mid table clubs not to get a Sancho level player no excuses
I mean saying there are zero excuses not to spend 120 million pounds on a player, what would be the biggest fee ever paid by a premier league club in the midst of massive financial uncertainty just because other teams are prepared to lose money in the midst of a global economic meltdown isn't the most convincing argument I've ever heard
 
Both Chelsea and City could have bought him if they felt it was value for money. City walked away from the Pogba, Alexis and Maguire deal when they felt the price wasn't worth it. We have to learn the same and not overpay every time we want a player. Look at the kind of team red-bull as well as Bayern have assembled without ever over-paying.
 
Both Chelsea and City could have bought him if they felt it was value for money. City walked away from the Pogba, Alexis and Maguire deal when they felt the price wasn't worth it. We have to learn the same and not overpay every time we want a player. Look at the kind of team red-bull as well as Bayern have assembled without ever over-paying.

Bayern paid 80 million for Lucas Hernandez last summer.
 
Could be possible that we thought we would have offloaded more players from the team by now and raised enough for Sancho but having not happened and looking only like Smalling leaving I wouldn't be against the idea of using some of the Sancho money to strength other areas like LB and CB.
 
Both Chelsea and City could have bought him if they felt it was value for money. City walked away from the Pogba, Alexis and Maguire deal when they felt the price wasn't worth it. We have to learn the same and not overpay every time we want a player. Look at the kind of team red-bull as well as Bayern have assembled without ever over-paying.
We don't have the luxury of every German wanting to suckle at our teet, to the point they run down their contracts, like Bayern do.
 
Ahh after getting Sancho, I would want Utd to do everything they can to get Haaland. He has shown enough to suggest he’ll be a superstar and potentially the best striker in the world at one point.
I just think its a position that we should be the least worried for now, much more pressing matters for the next couple of transfer windows. Buut, i respect your opinion :).
 
He has a release clause of £60m ishh, which means other clubs will be in for him. I am not sure you can trust United doing this deal. They would bid £40m and it would become a saga. Someone like a Real, Juve will just pay the release clause and give the agent more money.

Yeah because our history is full of us being outbid by other clubs :rolleyes:

Say what you want about the way we conduct business and negotiate transfers, but one thing we can't accuse this lot of is scrimping on signings.
 
Yeah because our history is full of us being outbid by other clubs :rolleyes:

Say what you want about the way we conduct business and negotiate transfers, but one thing we can't accuse this lot of is scrimping on signings.

Our recent history says we would pay above the release clause
 
Gary knows nothing. How are we when we are trying our best to negotiate to the best of our benefits look desperate? He used to be a manager and should know better than anyone else here that is how transfers especially big money ones are usually conducted
 
Status
Not open for further replies.