Glorio
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2020
- Messages
- 5,613
It's Ok, didn't expect you to be able toI can't read them for you sorry dude
It's Ok, didn't expect you to be able toI can't read them for you sorry dude
I'm 100% sure that they would have made an offer if Terzic had stayed as their manager. But that's obviously just my personal theory.He was so good for Dortmund in his second spell there that they didn’t make us an offer to sign him permanently, even though he was available for a low fee.
It's Redcafe. In other threads, Rasmus is getting lauded as the second coming of the Brazilian Ronaldo after a couple of goals at home to Boba Gump.
I think a large part of what is helping as you've implied also is we/Maresca is basically using him more adequately, ala horses for courses/coq in the machine.He was so good for Dortmund in his second spell there that they didn’t make us an offer to sign him permanently, even though he was available for a low fee. That’s about it, not sure why people want to re-write the past.
Always been insanely talented, if Chelsea manage to get him to consistently play at a high level then kudos. Maybe it suits him better to be in a club where the atmosphere is a bit more relaxed and he can be rotated a bit more, less overall pressure and less media focus. No doubt that he has a problematic mindset which makes him difficult to handle.
He is looking gud in a Chelsea shirt atm.
Shows the difference in standards from fans.
If Sancho had the same performances in a red shirt no one would be saying he is looking good.
Him playing a few okay games for Chelsea and suddenly he is looking good.
I was checking a few player ratings on live score sites and he seems to be the worst rated chelsea player alongside Lavia with an average of ~6.6 - in a winning side. They won 3:0 and he didnt get on the score sheet and didn't assist a goal. How could he have been great?
Obviously I can't have a strong opionion on this as i didn't watch the game but surely he could'nt have been that good. Seems like one of those performances at united when he has been ok and not shite.
It's absolutely not. His attitude was dogshit.
That's simply not true. Dortmund had someone who would go wake him up ffs. If that's not an attitude issue, I don't know what it.That's never been a problem elsewhere.
Unsure why the back and forth here.
He wouldn’t be playing over Amad currently who looks sensational and the better player.
United don’t miss or need him. Let him go in peace.
He’s been a big disappointment so understand somewhat but I’ve not seen anything so far to suggest moving him to you guys was a bad move or will be in the future.The thread is being kept active by United fans tbf. I agree with you though, I personally don’t think he’s playing well enough or bad enough to warrant a perpetually active thread but here we are.
I'd say he looks pretty good in a Chelsea shirt for a 25m acquisition.Shows the difference in standards from fans.
If Sancho had the same performances in a red shirt no one would be saying he is looking good.
Him playing a few okay games for Chelsea and suddenly he is looking good.
£25m and apprantly £100k'ish wages and I will agree he is probably a decent squad player option.I'd say he looks pretty good in a Chelsea shirt for a 25m acquisition.
I'd say he looks pretty good in a Chelsea shirt for a 25m acquisition.
He agreed to cut his wages to the base $100k and bonuses to join permanently.£25m and 300k yeah!
Is the £100k per wages confirmed by a proper source? Seems mental to take a £200k pay cut just to rely on bonuses.He agreed to cut his wages to the base $100k and bonuses to join permanently.
I have read here that Man United are paying partial wages during the loan, but have not seen a journalist write that.
I think the only thing that Orny said was Sancho agreed to a significant wage reduction.Is the £100k per wages confirmed by a proper source? Seems mental to take a £200k pay cut just to rely on bonuses.
So is this thread going to be bumped everytime he does something remotely noteworthy. Chelsea fans love to gloat as if they've robbed United blind. He's the definition of a fair-weather player - will look okay at times dependent on how how the team does but that's essentially it.
So is this thread going to be bumped everytime he does something remotely noteworthy. Chelsea fans love to gloat as if they've robbed United blind. He's the definition of a fair-weather player - will look okay at times dependent on how how the team does but that's essentially it.
I appreciate that playing Arsenal / modern Stoke is frustrating but yes of course? Especially as it was being bumped for far less noteworthy news items such as "being ill" and "picking up a knock in training".So is this thread going to be bumped everytime he does something remotely noteworthy. Chelsea fans love to gloat as if they've robbed United blind. He's the definition of a fair-weather player - will look okay at times dependent on how how the team does but that's essentially it.
O sweet summer childHe’s perfect for this Maresca team. Brilliant at receiving and maintaining the ball, is great in tight spaces in the final third, and is fantastic at aggressively running at defenders in 1v1’s. Can beat one and even two defenders with ease at times.
Think he’s going to get better and better with more starts.
What’s you gut feeling on him? Long term contributor to the team? Chelsea are going places now, so curious to know if he will be good enough for them.I appreciate that playing Arsenal / modern Stoke is frustrating but yes of course? Especially as it was being bumped for far less noteworthy news items such as "being ill" and "picking up a knock in training".
I think he's still our best option on the wings against teams who will sit deep and not stretch the game too much. His ball retention and final third passing are miles ahead of our other attackers minus Palmer - and he's exactly the sort of player who can help elevate Palmer by playing off him creatively.What’s you gut feeling on him? Long term contributor to the team? Chelsea are going places now, so curious to know if he will be good enough for them.
I've watched every minute of his appearances so far and that is a gross exaggeration. He needs to do a little more in 1v1s to be in that conversation, but like Hazard he can do so much centrally that it's not a necessity like it is for Madueke. Still very happy with his overall play and he's improved since he arrived. Certain starter right now for me.He’s perfect for this Maresca team. Brilliant at receiving and maintaining the ball, is great in tight spaces in the final third, and is fantastic at aggressively running at defenders in 1v1’s. Can beat one and even two defenders with ease at times.
Think he’s going to get better and better with more starts.
Don’t see why not? Plus, Sancho isn’t here to be a savior or main man. If his form dips we have a fantastic group of wide attackers to rotate with him.O sweet summer child
Clarification is needed I think - I agree that he's not great at 1v1s in space, but when running at a defender in or around the penalty box he's very dangerous - especially when he has a passing option nearby he can either use or feint a ball to.I've watched every minute of his appearances so far and that is a gross exaggeration. He needs to do a little more in 1v1s to be in that conversation, but like Hazard he can do so much centrally that it's not a necessity like it is for Madueke. Still very happy with his overall play and he's improved since he arrived. Certain starter right now for me.
I reckon it will all depend on whether your coach can keep him stimulated in the long term. Theres clearly a talent in there.I think he's still our best option on the wings against teams who will sit deep and not stretch the game too much. His ball retention and final third passing are miles ahead of our other attackers minus Palmer - and he's exactly the sort of player who can help elevate Palmer by playing off him creatively.
Based on what we've seen from Maresca he wants to tailor his approach to the opposition - so Sancho should always be someone who is useful in specific matchups. I doubt he'll be a world class player who walks into the best XI like Palmer or Caicedo at this point - but I do think he can be a very useful squad player who is especially handy when chasing a late goal.
I've watched every minute of his appearances so far and that is a gross exaggeration. He needs to do a little more in 1v1s to be in that conversation, but like Hazard he can do so much centrally that it's not a necessity like it is for Madueke. Still very happy with his overall play and he's improved since he arrived. Certain starter right now for me.
Yep agreed. It's been positive thus far but as competition for places gets harder next year we'll see how sustainable it is.I reckon it will all depend on whether your coach can keep him stimulated in the long term. Theres clearly a talent in there.
What’s you gut feeling on him? Long term contributor to the team? Chelsea are going places now, so curious to know if he will be good enough for them.