AttackingFlair
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 9,654
Would love him at United.
Both of them seems to be running all over the place as box to box players, but the comparistion is simple, because they have two get playing time to deliver, and there are always two spots. Playing time for one would mean less for the other and that would make the developing part less likely. In many of the games Cleverley will get to start, a defensive midfielder wont be needed.
The last thing we need is a defensive minded midfielder, we have Fletcher for many years to come. Spending a fortune at him right now does not seem like a great deal to me. Anderson are rather talented defensivly as well.
Fergie, Scholes, and Rooney speeding out of Carrington on the way to Liverpool.
The thing why most of the Caf are rating Rodwell is that he has youth on his side, I see a lot more in Rodwell than a 20 year old Fletch and look at what Fletch turned out to be with the guidance of SAF.
Rodwell has it all in his tank to become our very own Viera ( Possibly we also have Pogba ) but actually he has more pace and he just has that sense of calmness in MF...
Looks a lot more matured than anyone I've seen playing MF and he's just 20 FFS.
With Carrick in his late 20's and Hargreaves possibly back in 3 weeks, I think going for Rodwell would only benefit us.
didn't see fabregas 17-20 did you?
Ozil mark 2, nothing will come of this mark my words lol
Ozil mark 2, nothing will come of this mark my words lol
Although they don't exactly play the same position or are any way similar players, but I rate Rodwell higher then Wilshire.
I would love this to be true
same here, but its blatently bs
It be truely remarkable if we managed to sign rodwell. everton have no need to sell.
It be truely remarkable if we managed to sign rodwell. everton have no need to sell.
mind you 10m + carrick is very good offer. if i were them i would be tempted.
OK rodwell is a very promising player but he s not the finished article yet.
if we did that deal, we would need Anderson to cop on to himself and start producing, as we would be losing the only real passing CM apart from Scholes in the squad.
if we did that deal, we would need Anderson to cop on to himself and start producing, as we would be losing the only real passing CM apart from Scholes in the squad.
Indeed, Carrick when on form keeps the team ticking. I guess Ferguson would know if he thinks Carrick has peaked. I think he'll still be at a the club on September 1st mind you.
So this thread as now been chosen as a last hope for transfer junkies.
If I really had to, I'd rather give them Anderson and Gibson and £10M than Carrick and £10.
For me, nothing much. But my point wasn't that we should get him, but that I'd rather part with Anderson and Gibson both than Carrick if it were up to me and we really, really, had to buy him.
Same here but at times i get the feeling that fergie 's not entirely happy with Carrick ...but maybe its just my impression and nothing else
I'm not impressed,
what is the big deal with this lad?
I'm not impressed,
what is the big deal with this lad?
There's a good post from Brwned in here that sums up why so many rate Rodwell so highly, his composure in midfield for a lad of 19 combined with his physical gifts are the main reasons, plus being English he's seen as less likely to sod off to Spain once we make him great.