RedRover
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2007
- Messages
- 9,081
This is where we differ completely. I do not believe that you are a product of where you live but of your family. Denying someone the right to represent the nation they feel most connected to (for personal or family reasons) is not a price worth paying to stop "abuse".
As for your second point, in the cases you describe, it is likely the individual in question would have passports for both nations. Tony Cascarino had an Irish passport.
He actually didn't - because he was refused one. He went on to continue to play for Ireland for years after. It's all in his book.
He's an example of a player who played for Ireland because he didn't think he'd get picked for England. Did he have a burning desire to play for Ireland? Only he knows that but I wouldn't be surprised if he didn't. It was a chance to play international football and he took it - fair play to him. It's a joke though because he isn't Irish.
As I said, it's complex and in my opinion too complex. I can see that your opinion and argument has merit. If you apply it to genuine cases of young lads with a burning desire to play for the country their grandfather was from it looks much fairer to let them have a choice.
For the most part though players seem to make a decision based on career prospects. You then get Diego Costa - a Brazilian international, playing for Spain. Possibly because he thought he'd have more chance of starting.